Contemporary Patterns of End-of-Life Care Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Advanced Cancer.

IF 11.3 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JAMA Health Forum Pub Date : 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.5436
Youngmin Kwon, Xin Hu, Kewei Sylvia Shi, Jingxuan Zhao, Changchuan Jiang, Qinjin Fan, Xuesong Han, Zhiyuan Zheng, Joan L Warren, K Robin Yabroff
{"title":"Contemporary Patterns of End-of-Life Care Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Advanced Cancer.","authors":"Youngmin Kwon, Xin Hu, Kewei Sylvia Shi, Jingxuan Zhao, Changchuan Jiang, Qinjin Fan, Xuesong Han, Zhiyuan Zheng, Joan L Warren, K Robin Yabroff","doi":"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.5436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Considerable efforts have been dedicated to improving the quality of end-of-life care among patients with advanced cancer in the past decade. Whether the quality has shifted in response to these efforts remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine contemporary patterns of end-of-life care among patients with advanced cancer.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This retrospective cohort study used a recent linkage of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results and Medicare data to characterize patterns of end-of-life care. The cohort included fee-for-service Medicare decedents aged 66 years or older who were originally diagnosed with distant-stage breast, prostate, pancreatic, or lung cancers and died between 2014 and 2019. Analyses were conducted between June 1, 2023, and July 31, 2024.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Outcomes included monthly use of acute care, systemic therapy, and supportive care (ie, palliative and hospice care and advanced care planning) in the last 6 months of life. Additionally, a claims-based indicator was evaluated of potentially aggressive care in the last 30 days of life, defined as experiencing more than 1 acute care visit, in-hospital mortality, late receipt of systemic therapy, or hospice entry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 33 744 Medicare decedents with advanced cancer (mean [SD] age, 75.7 [6.9] years; 52.1% male). From 6 months before death to month of death, there was an increase in the mean (SE) number of acute care visits (from 14.0 [0.5] to 46.2 [0.5] per 100 person-months), hospice use (from 6.6 [0.4] to 73.5 [0.5] per 100 person-months), palliative care (from 2.6 [0.2] to 26.1 [0.6] per 100 person-months), and advanced care planning (from 1.7 [0.6] to 12.8 [1.1] per 100 person-months). Overall, 45.0% of decedents experienced any indicator of potentially aggressive care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This study found persistent patterns of potentially aggressive care, but low uptake of supportive care, among Medicare decedents with advanced cancer. A multifaceted approach targeting patient-, physician-, and system-level factors associated with potentially aggressive care is imperative for improving quality of care at the end of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":53180,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Health Forum","volume":"6 2","pages":"e245436"},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11846012/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Health Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.5436","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Considerable efforts have been dedicated to improving the quality of end-of-life care among patients with advanced cancer in the past decade. Whether the quality has shifted in response to these efforts remains unknown.

Objective: To examine contemporary patterns of end-of-life care among patients with advanced cancer.

Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective cohort study used a recent linkage of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results and Medicare data to characterize patterns of end-of-life care. The cohort included fee-for-service Medicare decedents aged 66 years or older who were originally diagnosed with distant-stage breast, prostate, pancreatic, or lung cancers and died between 2014 and 2019. Analyses were conducted between June 1, 2023, and July 31, 2024.

Main outcomes and measures: Outcomes included monthly use of acute care, systemic therapy, and supportive care (ie, palliative and hospice care and advanced care planning) in the last 6 months of life. Additionally, a claims-based indicator was evaluated of potentially aggressive care in the last 30 days of life, defined as experiencing more than 1 acute care visit, in-hospital mortality, late receipt of systemic therapy, or hospice entry.

Results: The study included 33 744 Medicare decedents with advanced cancer (mean [SD] age, 75.7 [6.9] years; 52.1% male). From 6 months before death to month of death, there was an increase in the mean (SE) number of acute care visits (from 14.0 [0.5] to 46.2 [0.5] per 100 person-months), hospice use (from 6.6 [0.4] to 73.5 [0.5] per 100 person-months), palliative care (from 2.6 [0.2] to 26.1 [0.6] per 100 person-months), and advanced care planning (from 1.7 [0.6] to 12.8 [1.1] per 100 person-months). Overall, 45.0% of decedents experienced any indicator of potentially aggressive care.

Conclusions and relevance: This study found persistent patterns of potentially aggressive care, but low uptake of supportive care, among Medicare decedents with advanced cancer. A multifaceted approach targeting patient-, physician-, and system-level factors associated with potentially aggressive care is imperative for improving quality of care at the end of life.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
晚期癌症医保受益人的临终关怀当代模式。
重要性:在过去的十年里,人们已经做出了相当大的努力来提高晚期癌症患者的临终关怀质量。质量是否因这些努力而有所改变仍不得而知。目的:探讨当代晚期癌症患者临终关怀模式。设计、环境和参与者:这项回顾性队列研究使用了最近的监测、流行病学、最终结果和医疗保险数据的联系来描述临终关怀的模式。该队列包括66岁或以上的按服务收费的医疗保险死者,他们最初被诊断患有晚期乳腺癌、前列腺癌、胰腺癌或肺癌,并在2014年至2019年期间死亡。分析时间为2023年6月1日至2024年7月31日。主要结局和措施:结局包括在生命的最后6个月内每月使用急性护理、全身治疗和支持性护理(即姑息治疗和临终关怀以及高级护理计划)。此外,对生命最后30天内潜在的积极治疗进行了基于索赔的指标评估,定义为经历1次以上的急性护理就诊、住院死亡率、延迟接受全身治疗或进入临终关怀。结果:该研究纳入33 744例晚期癌症的医疗保险死者(平均[SD]年龄,75.7[6.9]岁;52.1%的男性)。从死亡前6个月到死亡月份,急性护理就诊的平均(SE)次数(从每100人月14.0次[0.5]到46.2次[0.5])、安宁疗护的使用(从每100人月6.6次[0.4]到73.5次[0.5])、缓和疗护(从每100人月2.6次[0.2]到26.1次[0.6])和高级疗护计划(从每100人月1.7次[0.6]到12.8次[1.1])均有所增加。总体而言,45.0%的死者经历了任何潜在的侵略性护理指标。结论和相关性:本研究发现,在晚期癌症的医疗保险死者中,潜在的积极治疗持续存在,但支持性治疗的接受程度较低。针对与潜在积极治疗相关的患者、医生和系统层面因素的多方面方法对于提高生命末期的护理质量至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JAMA Health Forum is an international, peer-reviewed, online, open access journal that addresses health policy and strategies affecting medicine, health, and health care. The journal publishes original research, evidence-based reports, and opinion about national and global health policy. It covers innovative approaches to health care delivery and health care economics, access, quality, safety, equity, and reform. In addition to publishing articles, JAMA Health Forum also features commentary from health policy leaders on the JAMA Forum. It covers news briefs on major reports released by government agencies, foundations, health policy think tanks, and other policy-focused organizations. JAMA Health Forum is a member of the JAMA Network, which is a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. The journal presents curated health policy content from across the JAMA Network, including journals such as JAMA and JAMA Internal Medicine.
期刊最新文献
Trump-Era Health Coverage Changes-What Will We Know and When? Racial Disparities in Food Insecurity for High- and Low-Income Households. State Prior Authorization Prohibitions and Buprenorphine Retention Among Privately Insured Patients. A Novel Approach to Overseeing the Clinical Application of Generative AI. JAMA Health Forum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1