Bennett Andrassy, Junaid Mukhdomi, Nidhi Bhaskar, Marcus Harris, Taif Mukhdomi
{"title":"Unrestricted insurance coverage of buprenorphine formulations remains sparse in comparison to conventional opioids.","authors":"Bennett Andrassy, Junaid Mukhdomi, Nidhi Bhaskar, Marcus Harris, Taif Mukhdomi","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-106306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Buprenorphine is an atypical opioid with analgesic efficacy and a more favorable safety profile than conventional opioids or tramadol. In 2019, access to on-label buprenorphine formulations was limited in comparison to conventional opioids, despite evidence supporting buprenorphine's first-line analgesic use. Considering recent policy changes increasing buprenorphine accessibility, we determined differences in unrestricted insurance coverage between buprenorphine, conventional opioids, and other atypical opioids.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from Managed Market Insights and Technology's Coverage Search and Kaiser Family Foundation to generate estimates on percentages of US-covered lives with unrestricted access to oxycodone, morphine, tramadol, tapentadol, generic and on-label transdermal buprenorphine, on-label buccal buprenorphine, and on-label sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone in 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>79.7% of commercial and 99.1% of Medicare lives had unrestricted oxycodone access. Morphine access was unrestricted for 45.7% of commercial and 62.8% of Medicare lives. Unrestricted access to tramadol was available for 88.2% of commercial and 96.3% of Medicare lives. 37.3% of commercial and 10.1% of Medicare lives had unrestricted tapentadol access. Unrestricted access to on-label transdermal buprenorphine was available for 21.0% of commercial and 2.59% of Medicare lives. Generic transdermal buprenorphine was available for 52.1% of commercial and 30.0% of Medicare lives. Buccal buprenorphine was available without restriction for 52.7% of commercial and 19.8% of Medicare lives. Sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone had unrestricted coverage for 34.6% of commercial and 32.7% of Medicare lives.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Access to buprenorphine formulations was limited in comparison to other opioids. This study emphasizes a need for commercial and Medicare health insurance plans to broaden buprenorphine coverage.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-106306","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Buprenorphine is an atypical opioid with analgesic efficacy and a more favorable safety profile than conventional opioids or tramadol. In 2019, access to on-label buprenorphine formulations was limited in comparison to conventional opioids, despite evidence supporting buprenorphine's first-line analgesic use. Considering recent policy changes increasing buprenorphine accessibility, we determined differences in unrestricted insurance coverage between buprenorphine, conventional opioids, and other atypical opioids.
Methods: We used data from Managed Market Insights and Technology's Coverage Search and Kaiser Family Foundation to generate estimates on percentages of US-covered lives with unrestricted access to oxycodone, morphine, tramadol, tapentadol, generic and on-label transdermal buprenorphine, on-label buccal buprenorphine, and on-label sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone in 2024.
Results: 79.7% of commercial and 99.1% of Medicare lives had unrestricted oxycodone access. Morphine access was unrestricted for 45.7% of commercial and 62.8% of Medicare lives. Unrestricted access to tramadol was available for 88.2% of commercial and 96.3% of Medicare lives. 37.3% of commercial and 10.1% of Medicare lives had unrestricted tapentadol access. Unrestricted access to on-label transdermal buprenorphine was available for 21.0% of commercial and 2.59% of Medicare lives. Generic transdermal buprenorphine was available for 52.1% of commercial and 30.0% of Medicare lives. Buccal buprenorphine was available without restriction for 52.7% of commercial and 19.8% of Medicare lives. Sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone had unrestricted coverage for 34.6% of commercial and 32.7% of Medicare lives.
Conclusions: Access to buprenorphine formulations was limited in comparison to other opioids. This study emphasizes a need for commercial and Medicare health insurance plans to broaden buprenorphine coverage.
目的:丁丙诺啡是一种非典型阿片类药物,与传统阿片类药物或曲马多相比,丁丙诺啡具有较好的镇痛效果和安全性。2019年,与传统阿片类药物相比,丁丙诺啡标签制剂的可及性受到限制,尽管有证据支持丁丙诺啡是一线镇痛药。考虑到最近的政策变化增加了丁丙诺啡的可及性,我们确定了丁丙诺啡、传统阿片类药物和其他非典型阿片类药物在无限制保险覆盖率方面的差异。方法:我们使用来自Managed Market Insights and Technology的覆盖范围搜索和Kaiser Family Foundation的数据,对2024年无限制获得羟考酮、吗啡、曲马多、他他多、通用和标签上的透皮丁丙诺啡、标签上的口腔丁丙诺啡和标签上的舌下丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮的美国覆盖生命的百分比进行估计。结果:79.7%的商业生活和99.1%的医疗保险生活无限制地获得羟考酮。45.7%的商业生命和62.8%的医疗保险生命获得吗啡是不受限制的。88.2%的商业生命和96.3%的医疗保险生命可以无限制地获得曲马多。37.3%的商业生命和10.1%的医疗保险生命无限制地使用他他多。21.0%的商业生命和2.59%的医疗保险生命可以无限制地获得标签上的透皮丁丙诺啡。普通透皮丁丙诺啡可用于52.1%的商业生活和30.0%的医疗保险生活。52.7%的商业生命和19.8%的医疗保险生命可以无限制地使用丁丙诺啡。舌下丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮对34.6%的商业生命和32.7%的医疗保险生命具有无限制的覆盖。结论:与其他阿片类药物相比,丁丙诺啡制剂的可及性有限。这项研究强调了商业和医疗保险计划扩大丁丙诺啡覆盖范围的必要性。
期刊介绍:
Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications.
Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).