Outcomes of tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte therapy in solid tumours – A systematic review and meta analysis

IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Critical reviews in oncology/hematology Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.104671
Ullas Mony , Vishnu Priya Veeraraghavan
{"title":"Outcomes of tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte therapy in solid tumours – A systematic review and meta analysis","authors":"Ullas Mony ,&nbsp;Vishnu Priya Veeraraghavan","doi":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.104671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) treatment is an individualized method of treating different types of solid tumors by using the immune system of the body to target and destroy cancer cells. Although its usefulness has been shown in certain diseases, such as ovarian cancer and melanoma, research is still being done to see whether it is also beneficial against a wider variety of solid tumors.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To methodically assess the safety, effectiveness, and clinical results of TIL therapy for various solid tumors.</div></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><div>A thorough search in various databases produced 218 papers on TIL treatment for various solid tumors (2018–2024). Nine of the ten papers that satisfied the requirements for inclusion in the quantitative analysis were also included in the systematic review. Two reviewers separately extracted the data and evaluated it. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool were used to evaluate the quality of the studies, and the I2 statistic in the meta-analysis was used to measure heterogeneity.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Numerous studies that looked at the effectiveness of TIL treatment in different types of cancer showed different results. In NSCLC and melanoma, higher CD8+/CD4+ TIL ratios were associated with improved outcomes; in advanced melanoma, TIL therapy was superior to ipilimumab. Response rates differed, with NSCLC showing up at 23.1 % and melanoma up to 53.3 %. Most studies were of good quality and is confirmed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, while some had problems with follow-up. The results' dependability was confirmed by the ROBINS-I and ROB2 tools, which showed low to moderate bias risk.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>According to the study's findings, TIL therapy is effective in treating solid tumors, especially melanoma, but its results vary according to the kind of cancer as well as tumour microenvironments. Therefore more research is needed to determine the best course of action.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11358,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 104671"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040842825000599","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) treatment is an individualized method of treating different types of solid tumors by using the immune system of the body to target and destroy cancer cells. Although its usefulness has been shown in certain diseases, such as ovarian cancer and melanoma, research is still being done to see whether it is also beneficial against a wider variety of solid tumors.

Aim

To methodically assess the safety, effectiveness, and clinical results of TIL therapy for various solid tumors.

Methodology

A thorough search in various databases produced 218 papers on TIL treatment for various solid tumors (2018–2024). Nine of the ten papers that satisfied the requirements for inclusion in the quantitative analysis were also included in the systematic review. Two reviewers separately extracted the data and evaluated it. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool were used to evaluate the quality of the studies, and the I2 statistic in the meta-analysis was used to measure heterogeneity.

Results

Numerous studies that looked at the effectiveness of TIL treatment in different types of cancer showed different results. In NSCLC and melanoma, higher CD8+/CD4+ TIL ratios were associated with improved outcomes; in advanced melanoma, TIL therapy was superior to ipilimumab. Response rates differed, with NSCLC showing up at 23.1 % and melanoma up to 53.3 %. Most studies were of good quality and is confirmed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, while some had problems with follow-up. The results' dependability was confirmed by the ROBINS-I and ROB2 tools, which showed low to moderate bias risk.

Conclusion

According to the study's findings, TIL therapy is effective in treating solid tumors, especially melanoma, but its results vary according to the kind of cancer as well as tumour microenvironments. Therefore more research is needed to determine the best course of action.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肿瘤浸润性淋巴细胞治疗实体瘤的疗效:系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞(tumor -浸润lymphocyte, TIL)治疗是一种利用机体免疫系统靶向并摧毁肿瘤细胞来治疗不同类型实体肿瘤的个体化治疗方法。虽然它对某些疾病的疗效已经得到证实,比如卵巢癌和黑色素瘤,但研究仍在进行中,以确定它是否对更广泛的实体瘤也有益。目的:系统评价TIL治疗多种实体瘤的安全性、有效性及临床效果。方法:在各种数据库中进行全面检索,得出218篇关于TIL治疗各种实体肿瘤的论文(2018-2024)。10篇满足纳入定量分析要求的论文中有9篇也被纳入系统评价。两位审稿人分别提取数据并对其进行评估。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表和Cochrane偏倚风险工具评价研究质量,meta分析中采用I2统计量衡量异质性。结果:许多关于TIL治疗不同类型癌症的有效性的研究显示了不同的结果。在非小细胞肺癌和黑色素瘤中,较高的CD8+/CD4+ TIL比率与改善的预后相关;在晚期黑色素瘤中,TIL治疗优于伊匹单抗。缓解率不同,非小细胞肺癌为23.1%,黑色素瘤为53.3%。大多数研究质量良好,并得到了纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表的证实,但有些研究在随访方面存在问题。ROBINS-I和ROB2工具证实了结果的可靠性,显示出低至中等偏倚风险。结论:根据本研究结果,TIL治疗实体瘤,特别是黑色素瘤是有效的,但其效果因癌症种类和肿瘤微环境而异。因此,需要更多的研究来确定最佳的行动方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
3.20%
发文量
213
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology publishes scholarly, critical reviews in all fields of oncology and hematology written by experts from around the world. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology is the Official Journal of the European School of Oncology (ESO) and the International Society of Liquid Biopsy.
期刊最新文献
“Targeting platelets in breast cancer: Insights into pathophysiology and therapeutic strategies” Chemotherapy in dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma: From neoadjuvant to palliative treatment options Tumor evolution in an ecological context: How genetic and microenvironmental factors shape the pathogenesis of pancreatic cancer Pulmonary microbiota is a hidden link between lung cancer Development and microenvironment: Potential for future immune therapeutic strategies Immunotherapy advancements in high-grade serous ovarian cancer: From promise to practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1