Editorial: Association of Antibiotic Exposure With Microscopic Colitis

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics Pub Date : 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1111/apt.70043
June Tome, Darrell S. Pardi
{"title":"Editorial: Association of Antibiotic Exposure With Microscopic Colitis","authors":"June Tome, Darrell S. Pardi","doi":"10.1111/apt.70043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Soon after microscopic colitis (MC) was first described, reports emerged of cases that appeared to be due to the use of certain medications. As case reports accumulated, the topic gained further attention. At one point, a sophisticated imputation score was created in an attempt to assess the likelihood of causality of a particular drug or drug class as a cause of MC with the conclusion that eight drugs or drug classes had a high likelihood of inducing MC and seven had an intermediate risk [<span>1</span>]. Combinations of these drugs, such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) together with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), may exacerbate the risk [<span>2-4</span>]. In addition to drug-induced MC scoring systems, various other clinical predictive models have been proposed to identify patients unlikely to have MC and in whom colon biopsies can potentially be avoided. More recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors used in oncology have also been associated with the development of MC [<span>5</span>].</p>\n<p>A meta-analysis of 12 case–control studies demonstrated modest odds ratios suggesting that exposure to NSAIDs, PPIs, SSRIs and aspirin was associated with the incidence of MC [<span>6</span>]. However, several studies evaluating this association demonstrated that the risk was significantly mitigated when controls with diarrhoea—rather than healthy subjects—were used for comparison [<span>7, 8</span>] indicating that the association with some of these medications was not causative but, rather, due to the medications exacerbating diarrhoea and thereby bringing milder cases to medical attention.</p>\n<p>Szilcz and colleagues have reported a modest association with antibiotic use and the development of MC in a large national case–control study of older adults in Sweden [<span>9</span>]. To control for detection bias, they also performed an analysis of the association between antibiotic use and normal colon biopsies. In this control group, the association with antibiotic exposure was even stronger indicating that the observed association with MC was probably due to detection bias. Similar to the studies discussed above, these results reinforce the need to consider the control group when studying associations between drug exposure and the development of MC.</p>\n<p>Therefore, accumulating evidence linking medication use to the development of MC indicates that the association for many drugs may be more confounded than causal [<span>10</span>]. This observation has important implications for understanding the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms underpinning the development of MC. However, the implications for clinicians caring for these patients are less clear. Specifically, if a patient is being evaluated for diarrhoea, whether they have biopsy-proven MC or not, a careful review of their medication list, including over-the-counter medications, is essential. If any drug might be temporally associated with the onset of diarrhoea, consideration should be given to stopping it and, if necessary, switching to another medication with similar effects but ideally from a different drug family. In many patients, diarrhoea will resolve or at least improve to be easier to manage with anti-diarrhoeal therapy rather than corticosteroids or immunomodulatory medications.</p>","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70043","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soon after microscopic colitis (MC) was first described, reports emerged of cases that appeared to be due to the use of certain medications. As case reports accumulated, the topic gained further attention. At one point, a sophisticated imputation score was created in an attempt to assess the likelihood of causality of a particular drug or drug class as a cause of MC with the conclusion that eight drugs or drug classes had a high likelihood of inducing MC and seven had an intermediate risk [1]. Combinations of these drugs, such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) together with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), may exacerbate the risk [2-4]. In addition to drug-induced MC scoring systems, various other clinical predictive models have been proposed to identify patients unlikely to have MC and in whom colon biopsies can potentially be avoided. More recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors used in oncology have also been associated with the development of MC [5].

A meta-analysis of 12 case–control studies demonstrated modest odds ratios suggesting that exposure to NSAIDs, PPIs, SSRIs and aspirin was associated with the incidence of MC [6]. However, several studies evaluating this association demonstrated that the risk was significantly mitigated when controls with diarrhoea—rather than healthy subjects—were used for comparison [7, 8] indicating that the association with some of these medications was not causative but, rather, due to the medications exacerbating diarrhoea and thereby bringing milder cases to medical attention.

Szilcz and colleagues have reported a modest association with antibiotic use and the development of MC in a large national case–control study of older adults in Sweden [9]. To control for detection bias, they also performed an analysis of the association between antibiotic use and normal colon biopsies. In this control group, the association with antibiotic exposure was even stronger indicating that the observed association with MC was probably due to detection bias. Similar to the studies discussed above, these results reinforce the need to consider the control group when studying associations between drug exposure and the development of MC.

Therefore, accumulating evidence linking medication use to the development of MC indicates that the association for many drugs may be more confounded than causal [10]. This observation has important implications for understanding the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms underpinning the development of MC. However, the implications for clinicians caring for these patients are less clear. Specifically, if a patient is being evaluated for diarrhoea, whether they have biopsy-proven MC or not, a careful review of their medication list, including over-the-counter medications, is essential. If any drug might be temporally associated with the onset of diarrhoea, consideration should be given to stopping it and, if necessary, switching to another medication with similar effects but ideally from a different drug family. In many patients, diarrhoea will resolve or at least improve to be easier to manage with anti-diarrhoeal therapy rather than corticosteroids or immunomodulatory medications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在显微镜下结肠炎(MC)首次被描述出来后不久,就出现了一些似乎是由于使用某些药物而引起的病例报告。随着病例报告的不断积累,这一话题得到了进一步关注。有一次,人们创建了一个复杂的估算分数,试图评估特定药物或药物类别作为 MC 病因的因果关系的可能性,结论是八种药物或药物类别诱发 MC 的可能性很高,七种药物或药物类别诱发 MC 的风险处于中等水平[1]。这些药物的组合,如非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)与质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)的组合,可能会加剧MC的风险[2-4]。除了药物诱导的 MC 评分系统外,还提出了其他各种临床预测模型,以确定不太可能患有 MC 的患者,并避免对这些患者进行结肠活检。最近,肿瘤学中使用的免疫检查点抑制剂也与 MC 的发生有关[5]。一项对 12 项病例对照研究进行的荟萃分析显示,接触非甾体抗炎药、PPI、SSRI 和阿司匹林与 MC 的发生率有一定的相关性[6]。然而,对这种关联性进行评估的几项研究表明,如果使用腹泻对照组而非健康受试者进行比较,则风险会明显降低[7, 8],这表明与某些药物的关联性并非是致病性的,而是由于这些药物会加重腹泻,从而使病情较轻的患者得到医疗关注。为了控制检测偏倚,他们还对使用抗生素与正常结肠活检之间的关系进行了分析。在这一对照组中,与抗生素暴露的相关性更强,这表明观察到的与 MC 的相关性可能是由于检测偏差造成的。与上述研究类似,这些结果进一步说明,在研究药物暴露与 MC 发病之间的关联时,需要考虑对照组。这一观察结果对了解 MC 发生的潜在病理生理机制具有重要意义。然而,这对护理这些患者的临床医生的影响却不太明确。具体来说,如果患者因腹泻接受评估,无论其是否经活检证实患有 MC,都必须仔细查看其用药清单,包括非处方药。如果任何药物可能与腹泻的发生有时间上的关联,则应考虑停药,必要时换用另一种具有类似作用的药物,但最好是不同药物家族的药物。许多患者的腹泻会通过止泻治疗而不是皮质类固醇或免疫调节药物得到缓解或至少得到改善,从而更容易控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
7.90%
发文量
527
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics is a global pharmacology journal focused on the impact of drugs on the human gastrointestinal and hepato-biliary systems. It covers a diverse range of topics, often with immediate clinical relevance to its readership.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Effects of a 12-Week Mediterranean-Type Time-Restricted Feeding Protocol in Patients With Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: A Randomised Controlled Trial—The ‘CHRONO-NAFLD Project’ Letter: Iron Metabolism in SLD—A Complex Puzzle That Requires Further Evaluation Editorial: Beyond Clinical Trials—Real-World Data Suggest Usefulness of GLP-1 RAs in MASLD Treatment. Authors' Reply Editorial: Beyond Clinical Trials—Real-World Data Suggest Usefulness of GLP-1 RAs in MASLD Treatment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1