Mental health clinicians’ practices and perspectives of eating disorder apps

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Psychiatry Research Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2025.116412
Claudia Liu, Jake Linardon
{"title":"Mental health clinicians’ practices and perspectives of eating disorder apps","authors":"Claudia Liu,&nbsp;Jake Linardon","doi":"10.1016/j.psychres.2025.116412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Smartphone apps have the potential to play an integral role in the management of eating disorders. However, despite evidence of efficacy, apps have yet to be widely adopted and integrated into clinical practice. This study sought to understand mental health clinicians’ practices and perspectives of eating disorder apps. One-hundred-eighteen mental health clinicians (67 % Psychologists, 10 % Psychiatrists, 10 % Counsellors, 6 % Psychiatric Nurses; 7 % other) responded to a survey assessing current practices, knowledge, and attitudes related to apps in practice. Nearly two-thirds of clinicians (63 %) had used/discussed apps with clients; the most common reasons were that apps complement their services (80 % endorsed) and are efficient methods for monitoring symptoms and progress (89 % endorsed). The most common reason for clinicians who had not used/discussed apps with clients was not knowing which apps were appropriate to recommend (82 % endorsed). Nearly 50 % of clinicians reported little to no knowledge of current eating disorder apps, as well as limited confidence in using them effectively in practice. However, 8 in 10 clinicians were open to incorporating apps in treatment, and most agreed that apps can be beneficial for psychoeducation, skill utilization, relapse prevention, and offering support when access to other help options is limited. Overall, findings show that clinicians are enthusiastic about the potential of apps to assist in the management of eating disorders, but clear barriers to their adoption and integration in practice remain. We outline actionable strategies aimed at addressing these barriers and facilitating the broader integration of eating disorder apps into practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20819,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry Research","volume":"347 ","pages":"Article 116412"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165178125000617","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Smartphone apps have the potential to play an integral role in the management of eating disorders. However, despite evidence of efficacy, apps have yet to be widely adopted and integrated into clinical practice. This study sought to understand mental health clinicians’ practices and perspectives of eating disorder apps. One-hundred-eighteen mental health clinicians (67 % Psychologists, 10 % Psychiatrists, 10 % Counsellors, 6 % Psychiatric Nurses; 7 % other) responded to a survey assessing current practices, knowledge, and attitudes related to apps in practice. Nearly two-thirds of clinicians (63 %) had used/discussed apps with clients; the most common reasons were that apps complement their services (80 % endorsed) and are efficient methods for monitoring symptoms and progress (89 % endorsed). The most common reason for clinicians who had not used/discussed apps with clients was not knowing which apps were appropriate to recommend (82 % endorsed). Nearly 50 % of clinicians reported little to no knowledge of current eating disorder apps, as well as limited confidence in using them effectively in practice. However, 8 in 10 clinicians were open to incorporating apps in treatment, and most agreed that apps can be beneficial for psychoeducation, skill utilization, relapse prevention, and offering support when access to other help options is limited. Overall, findings show that clinicians are enthusiastic about the potential of apps to assist in the management of eating disorders, but clear barriers to their adoption and integration in practice remain. We outline actionable strategies aimed at addressing these barriers and facilitating the broader integration of eating disorder apps into practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatry Research
Psychiatry Research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
1.80%
发文量
527
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Psychiatry Research offers swift publication of comprehensive research reports and reviews within the field of psychiatry. The scope of the journal encompasses: Biochemical, physiological, neuroanatomic, genetic, neurocognitive, and psychosocial determinants of psychiatric disorders. Diagnostic assessments of psychiatric disorders. Evaluations that pursue hypotheses about the cause or causes of psychiatric diseases. Evaluations of pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic psychiatric treatments. Basic neuroscience studies related to animal or neurochemical models for psychiatric disorders. Methodological advances, such as instrumentation, clinical scales, and assays directly applicable to psychiatric research.
期刊最新文献
Exploring cognitive symptoms in patients with unipolar and bipolar major depression: A comparative evaluation of subjective and objective performance Editorial Board Absence of nonfatal suicidal behavior preceding suicide death reveals differences in clinical risks A systematic review of the etiology and neurobiology of intermittent explosive disorder Mental health clinicians’ practices and perspectives of eating disorder apps
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1