Expert-level policy style measurement via knowledge distillation with large language model collaboration

IF 7.4 1区 管理学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Information Processing & Management Pub Date : 2025-02-22 DOI:10.1016/j.ipm.2025.104090
Yujie Zhang , Biao Huang , Weikang Yuan , Zhuoren Jiang , Longsheng Peng , Shuai Chen , Jie-Sheng Tan-Soo
{"title":"Expert-level policy style measurement via knowledge distillation with large language model collaboration","authors":"Yujie Zhang ,&nbsp;Biao Huang ,&nbsp;Weikang Yuan ,&nbsp;Zhuoren Jiang ,&nbsp;Longsheng Peng ,&nbsp;Shuai Chen ,&nbsp;Jie-Sheng Tan-Soo","doi":"10.1016/j.ipm.2025.104090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Policy style is a crucial concept in policy science that reflects persistent patterns in the policy process across different governance settings. Despite its importance, policy style measurement faces issues of complexity, subjectivity, data sparseness, and computational cost. To overcome these obstacles, we propose <strong>KOALA</strong>, a novel <strong><u>K</u></strong>n<strong><u>O</u></strong>wledge distillation framework based on large l<strong><u>A</u></strong>nguage mode<strong><u>L</u></strong> coll<strong><u>A</u></strong>boration. It transforms the weak scoring abilities of LLMs into a pairwise ranking problem, employs a small set of expert-annotated samples for non-parametric learning, and utilizes knowledge distillation to transfer insights from LLMs to a smaller, more efficient model. The framework incorporates multiple LLM-based agents (Prompter, Ranker, and Analyst) collaborating to comprehend complex measurement standards and self-explain policy style definitions. We validate KOALA on 4,572 Chinese government work reports (1954–2019) from central, provincial, and municipal levels, with a focus on the imposition dimension of policy style. Extensive experiments demonstrate KOALA’s effectiveness in measuring the intensity of policy style, highlighting its superiority over state-of-the-art methods. While GPT-4 achieves only 66% accuracy in pairwise ranking of policy styles, KOALA, despite being based on GPT-3.5, achieves a remarkable 85% accuracy, highlighting significant performance improvement. This framework offers a transferable approach for quantifying complex social science concepts in textual data, bridging computational techniques with social science research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50365,"journal":{"name":"Information Processing & Management","volume":"62 4","pages":"Article 104090"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Processing & Management","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306457325000329","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Policy style is a crucial concept in policy science that reflects persistent patterns in the policy process across different governance settings. Despite its importance, policy style measurement faces issues of complexity, subjectivity, data sparseness, and computational cost. To overcome these obstacles, we propose KOALA, a novel KnOwledge distillation framework based on large lAnguage modeL collAboration. It transforms the weak scoring abilities of LLMs into a pairwise ranking problem, employs a small set of expert-annotated samples for non-parametric learning, and utilizes knowledge distillation to transfer insights from LLMs to a smaller, more efficient model. The framework incorporates multiple LLM-based agents (Prompter, Ranker, and Analyst) collaborating to comprehend complex measurement standards and self-explain policy style definitions. We validate KOALA on 4,572 Chinese government work reports (1954–2019) from central, provincial, and municipal levels, with a focus on the imposition dimension of policy style. Extensive experiments demonstrate KOALA’s effectiveness in measuring the intensity of policy style, highlighting its superiority over state-of-the-art methods. While GPT-4 achieves only 66% accuracy in pairwise ranking of policy styles, KOALA, despite being based on GPT-3.5, achieves a remarkable 85% accuracy, highlighting significant performance improvement. This framework offers a transferable approach for quantifying complex social science concepts in textual data, bridging computational techniques with social science research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Information Processing & Management
Information Processing & Management 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
11.60%
发文量
276
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Information Processing and Management is dedicated to publishing cutting-edge original research at the convergence of computing and information science. Our scope encompasses theory, methods, and applications across various domains, including advertising, business, health, information science, information technology marketing, and social computing. We aim to cater to the interests of both primary researchers and practitioners by offering an effective platform for the timely dissemination of advanced and topical issues in this interdisciplinary field. The journal places particular emphasis on original research articles, research survey articles, research method articles, and articles addressing critical applications of research. Join us in advancing knowledge and innovation at the intersection of computing and information science.
期刊最新文献
Expert-level policy style measurement via knowledge distillation with large language model collaboration Beyond boundaries: Exploring the interaction between science and technology in fusion knowledge communities GNN-transformer contrastive learning explores homophily Temporal-spatial hierarchical contrastive learning for misinformation detection: A public-behavior perspective A robust rank aggregation framework for collusive disturbance based on community detection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1