Development of soil organic carbon quantification model and comparison based on CHN analyser, Loss on Ignition, and Walkley-Black methods for mangrove soils in Madagascar

IF 2.6 3区 地球科学 Q1 MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1016/j.ecss.2025.109182
Ismael Ratefinjanahary , Richard MacKenzie , Sahadev Sharma , Herintsitohaina Razakamanarivo , Voahirana Razafintsalama , Kevin Ravelosamiariniriana , Adam Welti , Nandrianina Ramifehiarivo
{"title":"Development of soil organic carbon quantification model and comparison based on CHN analyser, Loss on Ignition, and Walkley-Black methods for mangrove soils in Madagascar","authors":"Ismael Ratefinjanahary ,&nbsp;Richard MacKenzie ,&nbsp;Sahadev Sharma ,&nbsp;Herintsitohaina Razakamanarivo ,&nbsp;Voahirana Razafintsalama ,&nbsp;Kevin Ravelosamiariniriana ,&nbsp;Adam Welti ,&nbsp;Nandrianina Ramifehiarivo","doi":"10.1016/j.ecss.2025.109182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mangrove ecosystems have a high capacity to sequester and store atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) compared to other tropical forests. Most of this CO<sub>2</sub> is stored as organic carbon in the mangrove soils (50–90%). While quantifying carbon stocks in mangrove trees is generally a straightforward process, quantifying carbon stocks in mangrove soils can be difficult and expensive due to the lack of analytical equipment or the high costs associated with soil organic carbon (SOC) analysers, respectively. The large number of samples coupled with repeated soil sampling required to quantify soil carbon sequestration/burial rates can further inflate these costs. The development of SOC models to quantify carbon content can help resolve these issues and increase the ease of quantifying soil carbon stocks or sequestration rates. We compared different methods to quantify SOC stocks from multiple locations in Madagascar mangroves. A total of 1327 soil samples from 66 plots sampled from the west coast of Madagascar were consecutively analysed with the Walkley-Black (WB), Loss on Ignition (LOI<sub>400</sub>, LOI<sub>550</sub>) and CHN analyser methods. These four available methods resulted in significant differences (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) of SOC values, varying from 1.93 ± 0.04% with CHN, 4.49 ± 0.08% with LOI<sub>400,</sub> 4.54 ± 0.09% with WB, and 7.33 ± 0.11% with LOI<sub>550</sub>. As the CHN method is widely regarded as the most accurate method thus, CHN values were used to calibrate and estimate LOI<sub>400,</sub> LOI<sub>550</sub> and WB results with linear regression functions. After calibration, the coefficient of regressions resulted in conversion factors of 0.415 for WB, 0.253 for LOI<sub>400</sub> and 0.157 for LOI<sub>550</sub>. This study demonstrated the reliability of locally available methods for SOC analysis for mangroves and developed calibration coefficients that can be used to increase the accuracy of SOC methods when CHN analyzers are not available for blue carbon stock assessment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50497,"journal":{"name":"Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science","volume":"317 ","pages":"Article 109182"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272771425000605","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mangrove ecosystems have a high capacity to sequester and store atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) compared to other tropical forests. Most of this CO2 is stored as organic carbon in the mangrove soils (50–90%). While quantifying carbon stocks in mangrove trees is generally a straightforward process, quantifying carbon stocks in mangrove soils can be difficult and expensive due to the lack of analytical equipment or the high costs associated with soil organic carbon (SOC) analysers, respectively. The large number of samples coupled with repeated soil sampling required to quantify soil carbon sequestration/burial rates can further inflate these costs. The development of SOC models to quantify carbon content can help resolve these issues and increase the ease of quantifying soil carbon stocks or sequestration rates. We compared different methods to quantify SOC stocks from multiple locations in Madagascar mangroves. A total of 1327 soil samples from 66 plots sampled from the west coast of Madagascar were consecutively analysed with the Walkley-Black (WB), Loss on Ignition (LOI400, LOI550) and CHN analyser methods. These four available methods resulted in significant differences (p < 0.001) of SOC values, varying from 1.93 ± 0.04% with CHN, 4.49 ± 0.08% with LOI400, 4.54 ± 0.09% with WB, and 7.33 ± 0.11% with LOI550. As the CHN method is widely regarded as the most accurate method thus, CHN values were used to calibrate and estimate LOI400, LOI550 and WB results with linear regression functions. After calibration, the coefficient of regressions resulted in conversion factors of 0.415 for WB, 0.253 for LOI400 and 0.157 for LOI550. This study demonstrated the reliability of locally available methods for SOC analysis for mangroves and developed calibration coefficients that can be used to increase the accuracy of SOC methods when CHN analyzers are not available for blue carbon stock assessment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马达加斯加红树林土壤有机碳定量模型的建立及基于CHN分析仪、燃失法和Walkley-Black法的比较
与其他热带森林相比,红树林生态系统具有较高的隔绝和储存大气二氧化碳的能力。大部分二氧化碳以有机碳的形式储存在红树林土壤中(50-90%)。虽然红树林碳储量的量化通常是一个简单的过程,但红树林土壤碳储量的量化可能是困难和昂贵的,原因分别是缺乏分析设备或与土壤有机碳(SOC)分析仪相关的高成本。大量的样品加上量化土壤碳固存/掩埋率所需的重复土壤采样,可能进一步增加这些成本。发展有机碳模型来量化碳含量可以帮助解决这些问题,并增加量化土壤碳储量或固碳率的便利性。我们比较了不同的方法来量化马达加斯加红树林多个地点的有机碳储量。采用Walkley-Black (WB)、LOI400、LOI550和CHN分析仪对马达加斯加西海岸66个样地1327份土壤样品进行了连续分析。这四种可用的方法导致显著差异(p <;其中,CHN为1.93±0.04%,LOI400为4.49±0.08%,WB为4.54±0.09%,LOI550为7.33±0.11%。由于CHN方法被广泛认为是最准确的方法,因此,使用CHN值对线性回归函数校准和估计LOI400, LOI550和WB结果。校正后的回归系数为:WB的转换系数为0.415,LOI400的转换系数为0.253,LOI550的转换系数为0.157。本研究证明了当地可用的红树林有机碳分析方法的可靠性,并开发了校准系数,可用于在CHN分析仪无法用于蓝碳储量评估时提高有机碳方法的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
374
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science is an international multidisciplinary journal devoted to the analysis of saline water phenomena ranging from the outer edge of the continental shelf to the upper limits of the tidal zone. The journal provides a unique forum, unifying the multidisciplinary approaches to the study of the oceanography of estuaries, coastal zones, and continental shelf seas. It features original research papers, review papers and short communications treating such disciplines as zoology, botany, geology, sedimentology, physical oceanography.
期刊最新文献
Microplastics and chemical contaminants of polymers in cage-cultured fish: A pioneering case study from Ashtamudi Ramsar Lake, India Factors driving chlorophyll a dynamics during the ice-melting period in a temperate coastal lake: Based on a causality analysis Microplastic distribution and occurrence in benthic species along river–sea continua: Implications for coastal aquaculture in the South Yellow Sea In-situ monitoring of sediment accumulation behind a dock using a self-potential method Coastal hydrodynamics and anthropogenic activities drive mineralogical-geochemical spatial patterns and foraminiferal assemblages in the northern Gulf of St. Lawrence (eastern Canada)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1