Creation of prediction tool to guide further workup of febrile children in the emergency department under consideration for Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in children

JEM reports Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1016/j.jemrpt.2025.100153
Lauren Chavanne , Arthur Chang , Shawnice Kraeber , Michelle Penque , Mark D. Hicar
{"title":"Creation of prediction tool to guide further workup of febrile children in the emergency department under consideration for Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in children","authors":"Lauren Chavanne ,&nbsp;Arthur Chang ,&nbsp;Shawnice Kraeber ,&nbsp;Michelle Penque ,&nbsp;Mark D. Hicar","doi":"10.1016/j.jemrpt.2025.100153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C) is a post-infectious complication of COVID-19 in children. Its workup often necessitates extensive laboratory investigations.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This project sought to provide pediatric acute care providers with a data-based tool to guide further decision-making during initial workups for children under consideration for MIS-C.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We compared documented physical findings and laboratory data (complete blood counts, inflammatory markers, and electrolytes) from MIS-C cases (n = 46) to control data extracted from a pre-pandemic database of febrile children (n = 70). Significant findings on Fisher's exact test and independent t-tests were used to develop a scoring model. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to assess this scoring system using two different cohorts of MIS-C.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From initial comparative analysis, a score (≥3) utilizing levels of CRP, lymphocytes, platelets, and total white blood cells was developed. ROC curve analysis demonstrated excellent parameters, with overall sensitivity of 97.83 %. In children &lt;9 years old, the score had a sensitivity of 96.15 % and in ≥9 years old, the score demonstrated a sensitivity of 100.00 %. We validated the score on a geographically disparate cohort by showing a sensitivity of 88.37 % of all children and 94.74 % in children ≥2 years of age.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Use of this scoring system based on readily available laboratory values can eliminate many febrile children from consideration of MIS-C allowing front-line providers to focus more extensive laboratory evaluations and extended observation on fewer children with a higher likelihood of having MIS-C.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73546,"journal":{"name":"JEM reports","volume":"4 2","pages":"Article 100153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JEM reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773232025000173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C) is a post-infectious complication of COVID-19 in children. Its workup often necessitates extensive laboratory investigations.

Objectives

This project sought to provide pediatric acute care providers with a data-based tool to guide further decision-making during initial workups for children under consideration for MIS-C.

Methods

We compared documented physical findings and laboratory data (complete blood counts, inflammatory markers, and electrolytes) from MIS-C cases (n = 46) to control data extracted from a pre-pandemic database of febrile children (n = 70). Significant findings on Fisher's exact test and independent t-tests were used to develop a scoring model. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to assess this scoring system using two different cohorts of MIS-C.

Results

From initial comparative analysis, a score (≥3) utilizing levels of CRP, lymphocytes, platelets, and total white blood cells was developed. ROC curve analysis demonstrated excellent parameters, with overall sensitivity of 97.83 %. In children <9 years old, the score had a sensitivity of 96.15 % and in ≥9 years old, the score demonstrated a sensitivity of 100.00 %. We validated the score on a geographically disparate cohort by showing a sensitivity of 88.37 % of all children and 94.74 % in children ≥2 years of age.

Conclusion

Use of this scoring system based on readily available laboratory values can eliminate many febrile children from consideration of MIS-C allowing front-line providers to focus more extensive laboratory evaluations and extended observation on fewer children with a higher likelihood of having MIS-C.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对儿童多系统炎症综合征建立预测工具,指导急诊科发热儿童进一步诊治
儿童多系统炎症综合征(MIS-C)是COVID-19儿童感染后并发症。它的诊断通常需要大量的实验室调查。目的:本项目旨在为儿科急症护理提供者提供一个基于数据的工具,以指导在考虑患有MIS-C的儿童的初步检查期间进一步做出决策。方法:我们将46例misc病例(n = 46)的物理检查和实验室数据(全血细胞计数、炎症标志物和电解质)与从流行病前发热儿童数据库(n = 70)中提取的对照数据进行比较。使用Fisher精确检验和独立t检验的显著发现来开发评分模型。采用两个不同的MIS-C队列进行受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析来评估该评分系统。结果通过初步比较分析,得出CRP、淋巴细胞、血小板和总白细胞水平评分(≥3)。ROC曲线分析结果显示参数优良,总灵敏度为97.83%。在9岁儿童中,该评分的敏感性为96.15%,在≥9岁儿童中,该评分的敏感性为100.00%。我们在地理上不同的队列中验证了评分,显示所有儿童的敏感性为88.37%,≥2岁儿童的敏感性为94.74%。结论使用这种基于现成的实验室值的评分系统可以消除许多发热儿童对MIS-C的考虑,使一线提供者能够将更广泛的实验室评估和扩展观察集中在更少的儿童身上,这些儿童患MIS-C的可能性更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JEM reports
JEM reports Emergency Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
54 days
期刊最新文献
Erratum regarding missing statements in previously published articles Erratum regarding missing statements in previously published articles Erratum regarding missing statements in previously published articles Erratum regarding missing statements in previously published articles The dose of iodinated contrast required for a CT scan is below the toxicological threshold of concern for nephrotoxicity: a toxicological perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1