Long-term clinical outcomes of posterior monolithic and porcelain-fused zirconia crowns: A retrospective cohort study.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry Pub Date : 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.01.033
Yu Takaesu, Yusuke Taniguchi, Naoyuki Kaga, Yuichiro Yamaguchi, Kae Kakura, Nao Suzuki, Takashi Matsuura
{"title":"Long-term clinical outcomes of posterior monolithic and porcelain-fused zirconia crowns: A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Yu Takaesu, Yusuke Taniguchi, Naoyuki Kaga, Yuichiro Yamaguchi, Kae Kakura, Nao Suzuki, Takashi Matsuura","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.01.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Statement of problem: </strong>Monolithic zirconia crowns and porcelain-fused zirconia crowns have been evaluated with in vitro studies, but clinical evidence of their longevity is limited.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to compare the long-term cumulative survival and success rates of posterior monolithic and porcelain-fused zirconia crowns and to investigate risk factors associated with complications.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study included 235 patients and 255 crowns (dropout rate:10.9%). Clinical data were analyzed for single posterior monolithic zirconia crowns and porcelain-fused zirconia crowns placed consecutively during a 10-year period and for subsequent events during follow-up. Survival curves for the monolithic zirconia crown and porcelain-fused zirconia crown groups were drawn using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Statistical differences between groups were tested using the log-rank test (α=.05). The Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to identify risk factors for crown and abutment tooth complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 10-year cumulative survival rates of the monolithic zirconia crown and porcelain-fused zirconia crown groups were 86.0% (95% CI, 72.8 to 99.1%) and 71.0% (95% CI, 54.6 to 87.9%), respectively. The monolithic zirconia crown group had a higher survival rate than the porcelain-fused zirconia crown group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P=.108). The 10-year cumulative success rate was higher in the monolithic zirconia crown group than in the porcelain-fused zirconia crown group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P=.071). Two risk factors were identified for crown complications alone: a molar rather than premolar crown (P=.014, hazard ratio [HR]=6.012) and a maxillary rather than a mandibular crown (P=.003, HR=9.487).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 2 different types of crowns exhibited application site dependency for crown complications but not for abutment tooth complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":16866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.01.033","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Statement of problem: Monolithic zirconia crowns and porcelain-fused zirconia crowns have been evaluated with in vitro studies, but clinical evidence of their longevity is limited.

Purpose: The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to compare the long-term cumulative survival and success rates of posterior monolithic and porcelain-fused zirconia crowns and to investigate risk factors associated with complications.

Material and methods: The study included 235 patients and 255 crowns (dropout rate:10.9%). Clinical data were analyzed for single posterior monolithic zirconia crowns and porcelain-fused zirconia crowns placed consecutively during a 10-year period and for subsequent events during follow-up. Survival curves for the monolithic zirconia crown and porcelain-fused zirconia crown groups were drawn using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Statistical differences between groups were tested using the log-rank test (α=.05). The Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to identify risk factors for crown and abutment tooth complications.

Results: The 10-year cumulative survival rates of the monolithic zirconia crown and porcelain-fused zirconia crown groups were 86.0% (95% CI, 72.8 to 99.1%) and 71.0% (95% CI, 54.6 to 87.9%), respectively. The monolithic zirconia crown group had a higher survival rate than the porcelain-fused zirconia crown group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P=.108). The 10-year cumulative success rate was higher in the monolithic zirconia crown group than in the porcelain-fused zirconia crown group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P=.071). Two risk factors were identified for crown complications alone: a molar rather than premolar crown (P=.014, hazard ratio [HR]=6.012) and a maxillary rather than a mandibular crown (P=.003, HR=9.487).

Conclusions: The 2 different types of crowns exhibited application site dependency for crown complications but not for abutment tooth complications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
后部整体氧化锆冠和熔瓷氧化锆冠的长期临床效果:回顾性队列研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
599
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is the leading professional journal devoted exclusively to prosthetic and restorative dentistry. The Journal is the official publication for 24 leading U.S. international prosthodontic organizations. The monthly publication features timely, original peer-reviewed articles on the newest techniques, dental materials, and research findings. The Journal serves prosthodontists and dentists in advanced practice, and features color photos that illustrate many step-by-step procedures. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is included in Index Medicus and CINAHL.
期刊最新文献
Diazonium chemistry for bonding between PEEK and resin cement. Palatal marking technique for accurate alignment of intraoral scans in an edentulous maxillary arch. Long-term clinical outcomes of posterior monolithic and porcelain-fused zirconia crowns: A retrospective cohort study. Management of a patient with ectodermal dysplasia with implant-assisted and implant-supported restorations: Sixteen years of clinical care. Physical properties, microbial adhesion, and biocompatibility of additively manufactured ceramic-reinforced resin: Effect of zwitterionic polymer content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1