Depth of response in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer treated with first-line chemotherapy: A supplementary analysis of JCOG1407.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pancreatology Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1016/j.pan.2025.02.005
Taro Shibuki, Masafumi Ikeda, Masayuki Yokoyama, Yusuke Sano, Junji Furuse, Satoshi Kobayashi, Akihiro Ohba, Akiko Todaka, Yoshiki Horie, Kazuhiko Shioji, Masashi Kanai, Tomohiro Nishina, Yusuke Kumamoto, Nao Fujimori, Akio Katanuma, Yukiko Takayama, Hidetaka Tsumura, Haruo Miwa, Masato Ozaka, Makoto Ueno
{"title":"Depth of response in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer treated with first-line chemotherapy: A supplementary analysis of JCOG1407.","authors":"Taro Shibuki, Masafumi Ikeda, Masayuki Yokoyama, Yusuke Sano, Junji Furuse, Satoshi Kobayashi, Akihiro Ohba, Akiko Todaka, Yoshiki Horie, Kazuhiko Shioji, Masashi Kanai, Tomohiro Nishina, Yusuke Kumamoto, Nao Fujimori, Akio Katanuma, Yukiko Takayama, Hidetaka Tsumura, Haruo Miwa, Masato Ozaka, Makoto Ueno","doi":"10.1016/j.pan.2025.02.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Depth of response (DpR; maximum % reduction from baseline in sum of the target lesion diameters) has demonstrated potential in predicting prognosis in several malignancies. However, its role in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is still unclear. In JCOG1407, modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) exhibited comparable efficacy for LAPC. In this exploratory analysis using the data of JCOG1407, we focused on the association between DpR and prognosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>DpR was classified into three groups at the tertile point and patients' backgrounds and survival were compared. The impact of DpR on survival outcomes was evaluated using the multivariable Cox proportional hazard model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 126 patients enrolled in JCOG1407, 109 patients were included, categorized into three DpR groups: T1 (<-37.2 %), T2 (-37.2 to -13.6 %), and T3 (>-13.6 %). The median DpR was significantly greater in the GnP arm than in the mFOLFIRINOX arm (-28.9 vs. -22.7 %, P = 0.041). Median duration of response tended to be shorter in the GnP arm than in the mFOLFIRINOX arm, although the difference was not significant (5.3 vs. 8.2 months, P = 0.132). Greater DpR (T1) had a significantly larger impact on better progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than T3, with the hazard ratio of 0.469 (95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.268-0.821, P = 0.008), and 0.398 (95 % CI 0.217-0.728, P = 0.003), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>mFOLFIRINOX and GnP had similar OS, it is noteworthy that the regimens exhibited differences in DpR, with GnP leading to greater DpR. Greater DpR are associated with improved survival in patients with LAPC.</p>","PeriodicalId":19976,"journal":{"name":"Pancreatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pancreatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2025.02.005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objectives: Depth of response (DpR; maximum % reduction from baseline in sum of the target lesion diameters) has demonstrated potential in predicting prognosis in several malignancies. However, its role in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is still unclear. In JCOG1407, modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) exhibited comparable efficacy for LAPC. In this exploratory analysis using the data of JCOG1407, we focused on the association between DpR and prognosis.

Methods: DpR was classified into three groups at the tertile point and patients' backgrounds and survival were compared. The impact of DpR on survival outcomes was evaluated using the multivariable Cox proportional hazard model.

Results: Of the 126 patients enrolled in JCOG1407, 109 patients were included, categorized into three DpR groups: T1 (<-37.2 %), T2 (-37.2 to -13.6 %), and T3 (>-13.6 %). The median DpR was significantly greater in the GnP arm than in the mFOLFIRINOX arm (-28.9 vs. -22.7 %, P = 0.041). Median duration of response tended to be shorter in the GnP arm than in the mFOLFIRINOX arm, although the difference was not significant (5.3 vs. 8.2 months, P = 0.132). Greater DpR (T1) had a significantly larger impact on better progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than T3, with the hazard ratio of 0.469 (95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.268-0.821, P = 0.008), and 0.398 (95 % CI 0.217-0.728, P = 0.003), respectively.

Conclusions: mFOLFIRINOX and GnP had similar OS, it is noteworthy that the regimens exhibited differences in DpR, with GnP leading to greater DpR. Greater DpR are associated with improved survival in patients with LAPC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pancreatology
Pancreatology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
194
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Pancreatology is the official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP), the European Pancreatic Club (EPC) and several national societies and study groups around the world. Dedicated to the understanding and treatment of exocrine as well as endocrine pancreatic disease, this multidisciplinary periodical publishes original basic, translational and clinical pancreatic research from a range of fields including gastroenterology, oncology, surgery, pharmacology, cellular and molecular biology as well as endocrinology, immunology and epidemiology. Readers can expect to gain new insights into pancreatic physiology and into the pathogenesis, diagnosis, therapeutic approaches and prognosis of pancreatic diseases. The journal features original articles, case reports, consensus guidelines and topical, cutting edge reviews, thus representing a source of valuable, novel information for clinical and basic researchers alike.
期刊最新文献
From Misdiagnosis to Management of Pancreatic Cystic Tumors Initially Identified as Pseudocysts and Treated with Cystogastrostomy: Experience from a Tertiary Care Center. Depth of response in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer treated with first-line chemotherapy: A supplementary analysis of JCOG1407. Albumin ratio-based indicator for predicting inpatient mortality in acute pancreatitis patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Why is the rectal route for NSAIDS favorable for preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis? Letter to the editor: Risk score to predict inpatient mortality of acute pancreatitis patients admitted to the intensive care unit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1