Scapular Stabilization Exercise on Pain and Functional Recovery in People with Shoulder Impingement Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Physician and Sportsmedicine Pub Date : 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1080/00913847.2025.2470115
Alecio Brasileiro, Camila Sousa, Ingara Schindler, Bruno Tanaca, Maycon Oliveira, Ramon Martins, Fabio Arcanjo, Mansueto Gomes Neto
{"title":"Scapular Stabilization Exercise on Pain and Functional Recovery in People with Shoulder Impingement Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Alecio Brasileiro, Camila Sousa, Ingara Schindler, Bruno Tanaca, Maycon Oliveira, Ramon Martins, Fabio Arcanjo, Mansueto Gomes Neto","doi":"10.1080/00913847.2025.2470115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effects of scapular stabilization exercise training on pain andfunctionalrecovery in peoplewith shoulder impingement syndrome.Design: Asystematic review protocol was registered with PROSPERO. We systematically searched different databases. A random-effects model was used to determinethe mean difference (MD) and 95% confidenceinterval (CI) for pain and functional recovery. Heterogeneity among studies wasexamined using the I<sup>2</sup> statistic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteenstudies (666 participants) were included in theanalysis. Addition of scapular stabilization-based exercise training to generalexercises reduce pain MD -0.8 cm (95% CI, -1.07 to - 0.4; I² = 0%) and improvethe functionalrecovery and shoulder abduction range of motion MD -13.27 (95% CI, -16.85 to-9.69; I² = 5%) and MD 2.74 degrees (95% CI, 0.3 to5.2; I² = 0%, respectively. However, the certainty of theevidence is low to very low. No significant differences in pain or functional recovery were found between participants in the scapularstabilization-based exercise training with the feedback group and those in the scapular stabilization-basedexercise training without the feedback group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings arepromising; however, higher quality RCT are needed to better establish thesuperiority of the rehabilitation programs that include scapular stabilizationexercises.</p>","PeriodicalId":51268,"journal":{"name":"Physician and Sportsmedicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physician and Sportsmedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00913847.2025.2470115","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effects of scapular stabilization exercise training on pain andfunctionalrecovery in peoplewith shoulder impingement syndrome.Design: Asystematic review protocol was registered with PROSPERO. We systematically searched different databases. A random-effects model was used to determinethe mean difference (MD) and 95% confidenceinterval (CI) for pain and functional recovery. Heterogeneity among studies wasexamined using the I2 statistic.

Results: Fourteenstudies (666 participants) were included in theanalysis. Addition of scapular stabilization-based exercise training to generalexercises reduce pain MD -0.8 cm (95% CI, -1.07 to - 0.4; I² = 0%) and improvethe functionalrecovery and shoulder abduction range of motion MD -13.27 (95% CI, -16.85 to-9.69; I² = 5%) and MD 2.74 degrees (95% CI, 0.3 to5.2; I² = 0%, respectively. However, the certainty of theevidence is low to very low. No significant differences in pain or functional recovery were found between participants in the scapularstabilization-based exercise training with the feedback group and those in the scapular stabilization-basedexercise training without the feedback group.

Conclusion: Our findings arepromising; however, higher quality RCT are needed to better establish thesuperiority of the rehabilitation programs that include scapular stabilizationexercises.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Physician and Sportsmedicine
Physician and Sportsmedicine PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-ORTHOPEDICS
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
4.30%
发文量
60
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Physician and Sportsmedicine is a peer-reviewed, clinically oriented publication for primary care physicians. We examine the latest drug discoveries to advance treatment and recovery, and take into account the medical aspects of exercise therapy for a given condition. We cover the latest primary care-focused treatments serving the needs of our active patient population, and assess the limits these treatments govern in stabilization and recovery. The Physician and Sportsmedicine is a peer-to-peer method of communicating the latest research to aid primary care physicians’ advancement in methods of care and treatment. We routinely cover such topics as: managing chronic disease, surgical techniques in preventing and managing injuries, the latest advancements in treatments for helping patients lose weight, and related exercise and nutrition topics that can impact the patient during recovery and modification.
期刊最新文献
The rise in electric biking (E-Bike) injuries: a 10-year age and sex-specific analysis of national injury data. Scapular Stabilization Exercise on Pain and Functional Recovery in People with Shoulder Impingement Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Concussion knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors: a comparison study of youth athletes and their parents. Non-modifiable and modifiable factors affecting anxiety and depressive symptoms in young athletes. Investigation of lower extremity injuries in men's ice hockey: a 10-year analysis across the COVID-19 era.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1