Effect of healthcare professionals' perceived occupational stigma on organizational citizenship behavior: a moral cleansing perspective.

IF 3.1 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS BMC Medical Ethics Pub Date : 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1186/s12910-025-01185-6
Ganli Liao, Jianfeng Liu, Yi Li, Hongyi Ye, Jiayi Liang
{"title":"Effect of healthcare professionals' perceived occupational stigma on organizational citizenship behavior: a moral cleansing perspective.","authors":"Ganli Liao, Jianfeng Liu, Yi Li, Hongyi Ye, Jiayi Liang","doi":"10.1186/s12910-025-01185-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Occupational stigmatization in Chinese healthcare institutions has intensified due to negative public events (e.g., kickbacks, bribes, and patient conflicts). While previous studies have mainly focused on the negative effects of stigma on practitioners' physiological and psychological states of practitioners with low prestige, little attention has been given to the moral psychological mechanisms involved or the potential positive outcomes. This study aims to explore the moral mechanisms of healthcare professionals' perceived occupational stigma on organizational citizenship behavior (OCB), with a specific focus on the potential effects of moral credibility loss, moral sensitivity, and occupational prestige.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study employed a hierarchical regression method to test the theoretical model, using data from 554 healthcare professionals (including 311 physicians and 243 nurses) from 7 hospitals in China. Confirmatory factor analysis, hierarchical regression, bootstrapping analysis (= 5000 times) and simple slope test using SPSS and AMOS were employed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The empirical results demonstrate that healthcare professionals' occupational stigma enhances OCB by increasing moral credibility loss, with moral sensitivity playing a moderating role. Additionally, this study categorizes healthcare professionals into two groups based on occupational prestige: physicians (high occupational prestige) and nurses (relatively lower occupational prestige). The findings indicate that occupational prestige not only moderates the positive relationship between occupational stigma and moral credibility loss but also moderates the relationship between moral credibility loss and OCB.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study comprehensively explores healthcare professionals' occupational stigma and reveals its positive moral effects, specifically in enhancing OCB through the moral cleansing perspective. These findings offer a novel understanding of occupational stigma, providing practical guidance for improving professional ethics and OCB.</p>","PeriodicalId":55348,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Ethics","volume":"26 1","pages":"28"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11844104/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-025-01185-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Occupational stigmatization in Chinese healthcare institutions has intensified due to negative public events (e.g., kickbacks, bribes, and patient conflicts). While previous studies have mainly focused on the negative effects of stigma on practitioners' physiological and psychological states of practitioners with low prestige, little attention has been given to the moral psychological mechanisms involved or the potential positive outcomes. This study aims to explore the moral mechanisms of healthcare professionals' perceived occupational stigma on organizational citizenship behavior (OCB), with a specific focus on the potential effects of moral credibility loss, moral sensitivity, and occupational prestige.

Methods: This study employed a hierarchical regression method to test the theoretical model, using data from 554 healthcare professionals (including 311 physicians and 243 nurses) from 7 hospitals in China. Confirmatory factor analysis, hierarchical regression, bootstrapping analysis (= 5000 times) and simple slope test using SPSS and AMOS were employed.

Results: The empirical results demonstrate that healthcare professionals' occupational stigma enhances OCB by increasing moral credibility loss, with moral sensitivity playing a moderating role. Additionally, this study categorizes healthcare professionals into two groups based on occupational prestige: physicians (high occupational prestige) and nurses (relatively lower occupational prestige). The findings indicate that occupational prestige not only moderates the positive relationship between occupational stigma and moral credibility loss but also moderates the relationship between moral credibility loss and OCB.

Conclusions: This study comprehensively explores healthcare professionals' occupational stigma and reveals its positive moral effects, specifically in enhancing OCB through the moral cleansing perspective. These findings offer a novel understanding of occupational stigma, providing practical guidance for improving professional ethics and OCB.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗专业人员职业污名感对组织公民行为的影响:一个道德净化的视角。
背景:由于负面的公共事件(如回扣、贿赂和患者冲突),中国医疗机构的职业污名化加剧。以往的研究主要集中在污名化对低声望从业者生理和心理状态的负面影响上,很少关注其中的道德心理机制或潜在的积极结果。本研究旨在探讨医疗保健专业人员职业污名感对组织公民行为的道德机制,特别关注道德信誉丧失、道德敏感性和职业声望的潜在影响。方法:本研究采用层次回归方法对理论模型进行检验,数据来自中国7家医院的554名医护人员(包括311名医生和243名护士)。采用验证性因子分析、层次回归、自举分析(= 5000次)及SPSS和AMOS简易斜率检验。结果:实证结果表明,医务人员的职业污名通过增加道德信誉损失来促进组织公民行为,其中道德敏感性起调节作用。此外,本研究根据职业声望将医疗保健专业人员分为两组:医生(职业声望高)和护士(职业声望相对较低)。研究结果表明,职业声望不仅可以调节职业耻辱与道德信誉丧失之间的正相关关系,还可以调节道德信誉丧失与组织行为之间的正相关关系。结论:本研究全面探讨了医护人员的职业污名,揭示了其积极的道德效应,特别是从道德净化的角度增强了组织公民行为。这些发现提供了对职业污名的全新理解,为提高职业道德和组织公民行为提供了实践指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Ethics
BMC Medical Ethics MEDICAL ETHICS-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.40%
发文量
108
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Ethics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the ethical aspects of biomedical research and clinical practice, including professional choices and conduct, medical technologies, healthcare systems and health policies.
期刊最新文献
Understanding what shapes patient and family experience of the open disclosure process in the Irish healthcare context: a qualitative study. Comparative legal and bioethical perspectives on euthanasia and assisted suicide: a systematic review of european frameworks. Incognito standardized patients for studying healthcare stigma: partial deception and other ethical challenges. Deciding whether to donate fetal tissue for research. Generative AI adoption and ethical perceptions: a comparative study of medical and non-medical researchers in Chinese universities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1