The Automated Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Screening in Patients With Leadless Pacemakers.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology Pub Date : 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1111/pace.15165
Maciej Dyrbuś, Joanna Machowicz, Anna Kurek, Mariusz Gąsior, Mateusz Tajstra
{"title":"The Automated Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Screening in Patients With Leadless Pacemakers.","authors":"Maciej Dyrbuś, Joanna Machowicz, Anna Kurek, Mariusz Gąsior, Mateusz Tajstra","doi":"10.1111/pace.15165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The number of leadless pacemakers (LPMs) implantations has seen a major growth in recent years. Indications for LPMs often overlap with indications for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (sICDs), as they are mostly recommended in patients in whom transvenous devices are deemed ineligible or contraindicated. Before sICD implantation, the patient should pass screening to verify the stability of QRS morphology in intrinsic and paced rhythms. The aim of this study was to evaluate the percentage of positive sICD screening in patients with a previously implanted LPM and evaluate the concordance between the vectors during the intrinsic and paced rhythm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-two patients who underwent implantation of the ventricular LPM from May to October 2024 were included in the present study. After the implantation, automated sICD screening was performed using the dedicated system, across 2-4 body positions, both during intrinsic and paced rhythms, in nominal, and emergency output.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients had the devices implanted in the interventricular septal location. Screening for QRS indicated that 94.1% of patients fulfilled the criterion for implantation of sICD in at least one vector during intrinsic rhythm, while only 23.8% and 28.5% passed screening during nominal and emergency pacing outputs, respectively. Positive screening concordance in at least one vector was observed in 23.5% of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite almost all patients having undergone successful screening during intrinsic rhythm, the low rates of positive QRS assessment were observed during pacing, what might raise potential concerns for an optimal coexistence of LPM and sICD in daily clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":54653,"journal":{"name":"Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.15165","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The number of leadless pacemakers (LPMs) implantations has seen a major growth in recent years. Indications for LPMs often overlap with indications for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (sICDs), as they are mostly recommended in patients in whom transvenous devices are deemed ineligible or contraindicated. Before sICD implantation, the patient should pass screening to verify the stability of QRS morphology in intrinsic and paced rhythms. The aim of this study was to evaluate the percentage of positive sICD screening in patients with a previously implanted LPM and evaluate the concordance between the vectors during the intrinsic and paced rhythm.

Methods: Twenty-two patients who underwent implantation of the ventricular LPM from May to October 2024 were included in the present study. After the implantation, automated sICD screening was performed using the dedicated system, across 2-4 body positions, both during intrinsic and paced rhythms, in nominal, and emergency output.

Results: All patients had the devices implanted in the interventricular septal location. Screening for QRS indicated that 94.1% of patients fulfilled the criterion for implantation of sICD in at least one vector during intrinsic rhythm, while only 23.8% and 28.5% passed screening during nominal and emergency pacing outputs, respectively. Positive screening concordance in at least one vector was observed in 23.5% of patients.

Conclusions: Despite almost all patients having undergone successful screening during intrinsic rhythm, the low rates of positive QRS assessment were observed during pacing, what might raise potential concerns for an optimal coexistence of LPM and sICD in daily clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
209
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology (PACE) is the foremost peer-reviewed journal in the field of pacing and implantable cardioversion defibrillation, publishing over 50% of all English language articles in its field, featuring original, review, and didactic papers, and case reports related to daily practice. Articles also include editorials, book reviews, Musings on humane topics relevant to medical practice, electrophysiology (EP) rounds, device rounds, and information concerning the quality of devices used in the practice of the specialty.
期刊最新文献
The Automated Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Screening in Patients With Leadless Pacemakers. Radiofrequency Versus Cryoballoon 180-Day Mortality Risk After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: An 8-Year Analysis. Exertional Intolerance After a Leadless Pacemaker Implant: What Is the Mechanism? Late Sustained Ventricular Arrhythmias After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: Outcomes and Predictors. Pacing Below the Programmed Rate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1