Impact of Smoking on Recurrence and Angiographic Outcomes After Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Sherief Ghozy, Seyed Behnam Jazayeri, Alireza Hasanzadeh, Julien Ognard, Hassan Kobeissi, Ali Ahmadzade, Ehsan Naseh, Mobina Motaghian Fard, Alzhraa S Abbas, Rachana R Borkar, David F Kallmes, Ramanathan Kadirvel
{"title":"Impact of Smoking on Recurrence and Angiographic Outcomes After Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Sherief Ghozy, Seyed Behnam Jazayeri, Alireza Hasanzadeh, Julien Ognard, Hassan Kobeissi, Ali Ahmadzade, Ehsan Naseh, Mobina Motaghian Fard, Alzhraa S Abbas, Rachana R Borkar, David F Kallmes, Ramanathan Kadirvel","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cerebral aneurysm recurrence serves as a significant endpoint for assessing the efficacy of various endovascular treatment strategies. The impact of smoking on outcomes such as aneurysm occlusion, recurrence, and recanalization remains unclear due to conflicting evidence.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To systematically evaluate the role of smoking in influencing angiographic outcomes following endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Comprehensive searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science STUDY SELECTION: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines to identify relevant studies assessing smoking's impact on intracranial aneurysms following endovascular treatment.</p><p><strong>Data analysis: </strong>Studies were screened, selected, and assessed for risk of bias using appropriate checklists. Data on complete and adequate aneurysm occlusion, and recurrence/recanalization rates were extracted. Random-effects meta-analyses calculated risk ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was measured using the I<sup>2</sup> statistic.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>A total of 26 studies, encompassing 6,031 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Smokers had higher rates of complete aneurysm occlusion (RR 1.12, 95% CI 1.06-1.19; p < 0.01). Subgroup analysis revealed that smokers undergoing flow diversion exhibited a higher rate of complete occlusion (RR 1.14, 95% CI 1.07-1.21; p < 0.01). However, for patients undergoing coiling, there was no significant difference in complete occlusion rates between smokers and non-smokers (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.83- 1.20; p = 0.46). Recurrence/recanalization rates were similar between smokers and non-smokers: RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.93-1.47; p = 0.20, and the rate of aneurysm retreatment did not differ between the smokers and non-smokers: RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.59-1.13; p =0.23.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Heterogeneity in definitions of smoking status, variations in follow-up durations, short follow up, retrospective nature of studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Smoking status does not significantly impact aneurysm recanalization or retreatment after endovascular repair. However, the impact of smoking on complete occlusion rate might differ based on the type of device used for treatment. Histological and molecular factors may contribute to varied outcomes, highlighting the necessity for further research to understand smoking's role in aneurysm healing. Clinically, patients should be advised about the risks of smoking, though current evidence suggests that smoking cessation may not consistently affect treatment efficacy.</p><p><strong>Abbreviations: </strong>sAH = subarachnoid hemorrhage; RROC = Raymond-Roy occlusion classification.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8712","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cerebral aneurysm recurrence serves as a significant endpoint for assessing the efficacy of various endovascular treatment strategies. The impact of smoking on outcomes such as aneurysm occlusion, recurrence, and recanalization remains unclear due to conflicting evidence.

Purpose: To systematically evaluate the role of smoking in influencing angiographic outcomes following endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms.

Data sources: Comprehensive searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science STUDY SELECTION: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines to identify relevant studies assessing smoking's impact on intracranial aneurysms following endovascular treatment.

Data analysis: Studies were screened, selected, and assessed for risk of bias using appropriate checklists. Data on complete and adequate aneurysm occlusion, and recurrence/recanalization rates were extracted. Random-effects meta-analyses calculated risk ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was measured using the I2 statistic.

Data synthesis: A total of 26 studies, encompassing 6,031 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Smokers had higher rates of complete aneurysm occlusion (RR 1.12, 95% CI 1.06-1.19; p < 0.01). Subgroup analysis revealed that smokers undergoing flow diversion exhibited a higher rate of complete occlusion (RR 1.14, 95% CI 1.07-1.21; p < 0.01). However, for patients undergoing coiling, there was no significant difference in complete occlusion rates between smokers and non-smokers (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.83- 1.20; p = 0.46). Recurrence/recanalization rates were similar between smokers and non-smokers: RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.93-1.47; p = 0.20, and the rate of aneurysm retreatment did not differ between the smokers and non-smokers: RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.59-1.13; p =0.23.

Limitations: Heterogeneity in definitions of smoking status, variations in follow-up durations, short follow up, retrospective nature of studies.

Conclusions: Smoking status does not significantly impact aneurysm recanalization or retreatment after endovascular repair. However, the impact of smoking on complete occlusion rate might differ based on the type of device used for treatment. Histological and molecular factors may contribute to varied outcomes, highlighting the necessity for further research to understand smoking's role in aneurysm healing. Clinically, patients should be advised about the risks of smoking, though current evidence suggests that smoking cessation may not consistently affect treatment efficacy.

Abbreviations: sAH = subarachnoid hemorrhage; RROC = Raymond-Roy occlusion classification.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The effect of diagnostic hypercapnic cerebrovascular reactivity imaging on vital signs and acute and follow-up ischemic adverse events in patients with flow-limiting intracranial arterial stenosis. Comparison of prophylactic endovascular treatments for threatened or impending internal/common carotid artery blowout syndrome. Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasound in Neck Node NIRADS Category 2. External Validation of a Winning AI-Algorithm from the RSNA 2022 Cervical Spine Fracture Detection Challenge. Impact of Smoking on Recurrence and Angiographic Outcomes After Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1