Patterns of health service use before and after diagnosis of endometriosis: a data linkage prospective cohort study

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Human reproduction Pub Date : 2025-02-23 DOI:10.1093/humrep/deaf026
Gita D Mishra, Dereje G Gete, Mohammad R Baneshi, Grant Montgomery, Jessica Taylor, Jenny Doust, Jason Abbott
{"title":"Patterns of health service use before and after diagnosis of endometriosis: a data linkage prospective cohort study","authors":"Gita D Mishra, Dereje G Gete, Mohammad R Baneshi, Grant Montgomery, Jessica Taylor, Jenny Doust, Jason Abbott","doi":"10.1093/humrep/deaf026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"STUDY QUESTION What are the patterns of health service use (HSU) before and after endometriosis diagnosis? SUMMARY ANSWER Women with endometriosis had higher rates of visits to general practitioners (GPs), specialists, and diagnostic imaging before and after diagnosis compared to those without the condition; however, after diagnosis, their visits to GPs and specialists other than obstetricians/gynaecologists decreased compared to before, while visits to obstetricians/gynaecologists and use of diagnostic imaging increased. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Women with endometriosis have higher rates of healthcare use compared to those without the condition; however, no longitudinal study has examined patterns of HSU over a prolonged period before and after diagnosis. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION The Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health linked to a national administrative health record. A total of 30 473 women, born in 1973–1978 and 1989–1995, from two cohorts with data collected from 1996 to 2021, as online or postal questionnaires. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Women with endometriosis were identified using the self-report surveys and their administrative health records. A control group of women without endometriosis was randomly selected and age-matched with women with endometriosis. The final sample included 9545 women from the 1973–1978 cohort (1909 cases, 7636 controls) and 7510 from the 1989–1995 cohort (1502 cases, 6008 controls). Women’s HSU was assessed using the Medicare Benefits Schedule database. A random intercept zero-inflated negative binomial model was used to compare outcomes between cases and controls, addressing skewed data, over-dispersion, and excess zeros. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE In both cohorts, women with endometriosis had a higher level of HSU, both before and after diagnosis, compared with those without the condition. For the 1973–1978 cohort, women with endometriosis had a higher rate of visits to GPs before and after diagnosis (adjusted incidence rate ratio: 1.19, 95% CI 1.14, 1.23 and 1.24, 95% CI 1.19, 1.30, respectively), specialists other than obstetricians/gynaecologists (1.50, 95% CI 1.40, 1.61, and 1.36, 95% CI 1.27, 1.46), and for diagnostic imaging (1.15, 95% CI 1.10, 1.21, and 1.20, 95% CI 1.15, 1.26). The average number of these visits remained consistent in the early years, peaked around 3 years before diagnosis, and then partly declined post-diagnosis, to later stabilize at a higher level than those without the condition. Following the diagnosis, women with endometriosis had a higher number of visits to obstetricians/gynaecologists (1.11, 95% CI 1.05, 1.17) than their matched controls, with a marked increase in the first 6 years post-diagnosis, but gradually returned to same levels as the control group. After diagnosis, women with endometriosis had a lower rate of visits to GPs (0.95, 95% CI 0.93, 0.98) and specialists other than obstetricians/gynaecologists (0.88, 95% CI 0.82, 0.93) compared to before their diagnosis, while they had a higher rate of visits to obstetricians/gynaecologists (1.09, 95% CI 1.01, 1.18) and diagnostic imaging (1.07, 95% CI 1.01, 1.14). Similar patterns of HSU were observed in the 1989–1995 cohort, regardless of whether surgically confirmed or clinically suspected cases of endometriosis were used, though the evidence for changes in specific HSU before and after diagnosis was weaker. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Approximately half of the women with endometriosis were clinically suspected cases without laparoscopic confirmation, which may result in an overestimation of prevalence and introduce the risk of misdiagnosis, potentially influencing clinical management and research findings. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The continued high level of HSU among women with endometriosis, even over a decade after diagnosis, suggests that they have substantially greater healthcare needs than other women. The distinct patterns of the use of healthcare in the years before and after endometriosis diagnosis can support efforts to improve diagnosis, management, and treatment outcomes for patients and to reduce healthcare costs. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) The Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health is funded by the Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care. G.D.M. and G.M. are Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Leadership Fellows (GNT2009577 and GNT1177194). D.G.G. was funded by MRFF EndoAIMM (RFEHP100126). Funding sources had no role in the study design, data analysis, interpretation, or manuscript writing. The authors have no conflict of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.","PeriodicalId":13003,"journal":{"name":"Human reproduction","volume":"774 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaf026","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION What are the patterns of health service use (HSU) before and after endometriosis diagnosis? SUMMARY ANSWER Women with endometriosis had higher rates of visits to general practitioners (GPs), specialists, and diagnostic imaging before and after diagnosis compared to those without the condition; however, after diagnosis, their visits to GPs and specialists other than obstetricians/gynaecologists decreased compared to before, while visits to obstetricians/gynaecologists and use of diagnostic imaging increased. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Women with endometriosis have higher rates of healthcare use compared to those without the condition; however, no longitudinal study has examined patterns of HSU over a prolonged period before and after diagnosis. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION The Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health linked to a national administrative health record. A total of 30 473 women, born in 1973–1978 and 1989–1995, from two cohorts with data collected from 1996 to 2021, as online or postal questionnaires. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Women with endometriosis were identified using the self-report surveys and their administrative health records. A control group of women without endometriosis was randomly selected and age-matched with women with endometriosis. The final sample included 9545 women from the 1973–1978 cohort (1909 cases, 7636 controls) and 7510 from the 1989–1995 cohort (1502 cases, 6008 controls). Women’s HSU was assessed using the Medicare Benefits Schedule database. A random intercept zero-inflated negative binomial model was used to compare outcomes between cases and controls, addressing skewed data, over-dispersion, and excess zeros. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE In both cohorts, women with endometriosis had a higher level of HSU, both before and after diagnosis, compared with those without the condition. For the 1973–1978 cohort, women with endometriosis had a higher rate of visits to GPs before and after diagnosis (adjusted incidence rate ratio: 1.19, 95% CI 1.14, 1.23 and 1.24, 95% CI 1.19, 1.30, respectively), specialists other than obstetricians/gynaecologists (1.50, 95% CI 1.40, 1.61, and 1.36, 95% CI 1.27, 1.46), and for diagnostic imaging (1.15, 95% CI 1.10, 1.21, and 1.20, 95% CI 1.15, 1.26). The average number of these visits remained consistent in the early years, peaked around 3 years before diagnosis, and then partly declined post-diagnosis, to later stabilize at a higher level than those without the condition. Following the diagnosis, women with endometriosis had a higher number of visits to obstetricians/gynaecologists (1.11, 95% CI 1.05, 1.17) than their matched controls, with a marked increase in the first 6 years post-diagnosis, but gradually returned to same levels as the control group. After diagnosis, women with endometriosis had a lower rate of visits to GPs (0.95, 95% CI 0.93, 0.98) and specialists other than obstetricians/gynaecologists (0.88, 95% CI 0.82, 0.93) compared to before their diagnosis, while they had a higher rate of visits to obstetricians/gynaecologists (1.09, 95% CI 1.01, 1.18) and diagnostic imaging (1.07, 95% CI 1.01, 1.14). Similar patterns of HSU were observed in the 1989–1995 cohort, regardless of whether surgically confirmed or clinically suspected cases of endometriosis were used, though the evidence for changes in specific HSU before and after diagnosis was weaker. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Approximately half of the women with endometriosis were clinically suspected cases without laparoscopic confirmation, which may result in an overestimation of prevalence and introduce the risk of misdiagnosis, potentially influencing clinical management and research findings. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The continued high level of HSU among women with endometriosis, even over a decade after diagnosis, suggests that they have substantially greater healthcare needs than other women. The distinct patterns of the use of healthcare in the years before and after endometriosis diagnosis can support efforts to improve diagnosis, management, and treatment outcomes for patients and to reduce healthcare costs. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) The Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health is funded by the Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care. G.D.M. and G.M. are Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Leadership Fellows (GNT2009577 and GNT1177194). D.G.G. was funded by MRFF EndoAIMM (RFEHP100126). Funding sources had no role in the study design, data analysis, interpretation, or manuscript writing. The authors have no conflict of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Human reproduction
Human reproduction 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.60%
发文量
1369
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Human Reproduction features full-length, peer-reviewed papers reporting original research, concise clinical case reports, as well as opinions and debates on topical issues. Papers published cover the clinical science and medical aspects of reproductive physiology, pathology and endocrinology; including andrology, gonad function, gametogenesis, fertilization, embryo development, implantation, early pregnancy, genetics, genetic diagnosis, oncology, infectious disease, surgery, contraception, infertility treatment, psychology, ethics and social issues.
期刊最新文献
Mapping the way to successful euploid frozen embryo transfer: a prospective pilot study of uterine elastography Real-time monitoring reveals the effects of low concentrations of volatile organic compounds in the embryology laboratory Effectiveness and safety of consecutive single embryo transfer compared to double embryo transfer: results from the UK HFEA registry. Burden of somatic morbidity associated with a surgically verified diagnosis of endometriosis at a young age: a register-based follow-up cohort study in Finland Patterns of health service use before and after diagnosis of endometriosis: a data linkage prospective cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1