Does metropolitan motorization reflect regional religious affiliations? A social reference consideration of car ownership

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q2 BUSINESS Research in Transportation Business and Management Pub Date : 2025-02-24 DOI:10.1016/j.rtbm.2025.101321
Gregory L. Newmark , Emma L. Rearick
{"title":"Does metropolitan motorization reflect regional religious affiliations? A social reference consideration of car ownership","authors":"Gregory L. Newmark ,&nbsp;Emma L. Rearick","doi":"10.1016/j.rtbm.2025.101321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Motorization rates, the number of private vehicles per thousand residents, are growing globally. Effective mitigation policy requires an understanding of the underlying drivers of auto ownership. Traditional statistical models of auto ownership have been criticized for excluding the social context within which major lifestyle decisions are made. This omission is seen as a contributor to the failure of policy to rein in motorization. This research addresses this concern by exploring the impact of one specific social group reference effect, religious affiliation, on countywide motorization in metropolitan regions in the continental United States. This research finds that religious affiliation rates are statistically significant predictors of motorization rates. This observation both suggests the importance of social reference group effects on auto ownership decisions and the potential value of tailoring sustainable transport policies to specific social groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47453,"journal":{"name":"Research in Transportation Business and Management","volume":"59 ","pages":"Article 101321"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Transportation Business and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210539525000367","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Motorization rates, the number of private vehicles per thousand residents, are growing globally. Effective mitigation policy requires an understanding of the underlying drivers of auto ownership. Traditional statistical models of auto ownership have been criticized for excluding the social context within which major lifestyle decisions are made. This omission is seen as a contributor to the failure of policy to rein in motorization. This research addresses this concern by exploring the impact of one specific social group reference effect, religious affiliation, on countywide motorization in metropolitan regions in the continental United States. This research finds that religious affiliation rates are statistically significant predictors of motorization rates. This observation both suggests the importance of social reference group effects on auto ownership decisions and the potential value of tailoring sustainable transport policies to specific social groups.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大都市的机动化是否反映了地区的宗教信仰?汽车所有权的社会参考考虑
机动化率,即每千名居民拥有私家车的数量,在全球范围内都在增长。有效的缓解政策需要了解汽车所有权的潜在驱动因素。传统的汽车拥有量统计模型因排除了主要生活方式决策的社会背景而受到批评。这一疏忽被视为控制机动化政策失败的一个原因。本研究通过探索一个特定的社会群体参考效应,即宗教信仰,对美国大陆大都市地区全县机动化的影响来解决这一问题。本研究发现,宗教归属率是机动车率的统计显著预测因子。这一观察结果既表明了社会参考群体对汽车所有权决策的重要性,也表明了为特定社会群体量身定制可持续交通政策的潜在价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
175
期刊介绍: Research in Transportation Business & Management (RTBM) will publish research on international aspects of transport management such as business strategy, communication, sustainability, finance, human resource management, law, logistics, marketing, franchising, privatisation and commercialisation. Research in Transportation Business & Management welcomes proposals for themed volumes from scholars in management, in relation to all modes of transport. Issues should be cross-disciplinary for one mode or single-disciplinary for all modes. We are keen to receive proposals that combine and integrate theories and concepts that are taken from or can be traced to origins in different disciplines or lessons learned from different modes and approaches to the topic. By facilitating the development of interdisciplinary or intermodal concepts, theories and ideas, and by synthesizing these for the journal''s audience, we seek to contribute to both scholarly advancement of knowledge and the state of managerial practice. Potential volume themes include: -Sustainability and Transportation Management- Transport Management and the Reduction of Transport''s Carbon Footprint- Marketing Transport/Branding Transportation- Benchmarking, Performance Measurement and Best Practices in Transport Operations- Franchising, Concessions and Alternate Governance Mechanisms for Transport Organisations- Logistics and the Integration of Transportation into Freight Supply Chains- Risk Management (or Asset Management or Transportation Finance or ...): Lessons from Multiple Modes- Engaging the Stakeholder in Transportation Governance- Reliability in the Freight Sector
期刊最新文献
Dry port development and hinterland air quality: Evidence from dry port developments in China Multi-scale spatiotemporal analysis of shared bike-metro interactions in Shanghai: Implications for sustainable urban mobility Commuting of teaching and administrative staff as a driver of sustainable transport policy at the university Does travel captivity affect the MaaS plan uptake? Flexible tickets and strategic revenue management in high-speed rail market competition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1