Bidding in day-ahead electricity markets: A dynamic programming framework

IF 4.3 2区 工程技术 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computers & Operations Research Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-22 DOI:10.1016/j.cor.2025.107024
Jérôme De Boeck , Bernard Fortz , Martine Labbé , Étienne Marcotte , Patrice Marcotte , Gilles Savard
{"title":"Bidding in day-ahead electricity markets: A dynamic programming framework","authors":"Jérôme De Boeck ,&nbsp;Bernard Fortz ,&nbsp;Martine Labbé ,&nbsp;Étienne Marcotte ,&nbsp;Patrice Marcotte ,&nbsp;Gilles Savard","doi":"10.1016/j.cor.2025.107024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Strategic bidding problems have gained a lot of attention with the introduction of deregulated electricity markets where producers and retailers trade electricity in a day-ahead market run by a Market Operator (MO). All actors propose bids composed of a unit production price and a quantity of electricity to the MO. Based on these bids, the MO selects the most interesting ones and defines the spot price of electricity at which all actors are paid. As the bids of all actors determine the price of electricity, a bidding Generation Company (GC) faces a high risk regarding its profit when placing bids as the bids of competitors are not known in advance. This paper proposes a novel dynamic programming framework for a GC’s Stochastic Bidding Problem (SBP) in the day-ahead market considering uncertainty over the competitor bids. We prove this problem is NP-hard and study two variants of this problem solved with the dynamic programming framework. Firstly, a relaxation provides an upper bound solved in polynomial time (SBP-R). Secondly, we consider a bidding problem using fixed bidding quantities (SBP-Q) that has previously been solved through heuristic methods. We prove that SBP-Q is NP-hard and solve it to optimality in pseudo-polynomial time. SBP-Q is solved on much larger instances than in previous studies. We show on realistic instances that its optimal value is typically under 1% of the optimal value of SBP by using the upper bound provided by SBP-R.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10542,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Operations Research","volume":"179 ","pages":"Article 107024"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Operations Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305054825000528","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Strategic bidding problems have gained a lot of attention with the introduction of deregulated electricity markets where producers and retailers trade electricity in a day-ahead market run by a Market Operator (MO). All actors propose bids composed of a unit production price and a quantity of electricity to the MO. Based on these bids, the MO selects the most interesting ones and defines the spot price of electricity at which all actors are paid. As the bids of all actors determine the price of electricity, a bidding Generation Company (GC) faces a high risk regarding its profit when placing bids as the bids of competitors are not known in advance. This paper proposes a novel dynamic programming framework for a GC’s Stochastic Bidding Problem (SBP) in the day-ahead market considering uncertainty over the competitor bids. We prove this problem is NP-hard and study two variants of this problem solved with the dynamic programming framework. Firstly, a relaxation provides an upper bound solved in polynomial time (SBP-R). Secondly, we consider a bidding problem using fixed bidding quantities (SBP-Q) that has previously been solved through heuristic methods. We prove that SBP-Q is NP-hard and solve it to optimality in pseudo-polynomial time. SBP-Q is solved on much larger instances than in previous studies. We show on realistic instances that its optimal value is typically under 1% of the optimal value of SBP by using the upper bound provided by SBP-R.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日前电力市场竞价:动态规划框架
随着放松管制的电力市场的引入,生产商和零售商在由市场运营商(MO)运营的提前一天市场上交易电力,战略投标问题得到了很多关注。所有参与者向MO提出由单位生产价格和电量组成的投标。基于这些投标,MO选择最有趣的投标,并定义所有参与者支付的电力现货价格。由于所有参与者的出价决定了电价,因此由于竞争对手的出价事先不知道,投标发电公司在投标时面临着较高的利润风险。本文提出了考虑竞争对手出价不确定性的日前市场GC随机竞价问题的动态规划框架。我们证明了这个问题是np困难的,并研究了用动态规划框架求解这个问题的两个变体。首先,松弛提供了在多项式时间内求解的上界(SBP-R)。其次,我们考虑了一个使用固定投标数量(SBP-Q)的投标问题,该问题先前已通过启发式方法解决。我们证明了SBP-Q是np困难的,并在伪多项式时间内求解到最优性。与以前的研究相比,SBP-Q在更大的实例上得到了解决。我们利用SBP- r给出的上界,在实际实例中证明了它的最优值通常小于SBP最优值的1%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Operations Research
Computers & Operations Research 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
8.70%
发文量
292
审稿时长
8.5 months
期刊介绍: Operations research and computers meet in a large number of scientific fields, many of which are of vital current concern to our troubled society. These include, among others, ecology, transportation, safety, reliability, urban planning, economics, inventory control, investment strategy and logistics (including reverse logistics). Computers & Operations Research provides an international forum for the application of computers and operations research techniques to problems in these and related fields.
期刊最新文献
Beware of the classical benchmark instances for the Traveling Salesman Problem with Time Windows A speed-up for Helsgaun’s TSP heuristic by relaxing the positive gain criterion A memory-enhanced Greedy Randomized Adaptive Search Procedure for the Multi-Pickup and Delivery Problem with Time Windows A neural-driven constructive heuristic for the flexible job shop scheduling problem: An efficient alternative to complex deep learning methods Constraint programming approaches for stochastic Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problem subject to disruptions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1