Deep learning calibration model for PurpleAir PM2.5 measurements: Comprehensive Investigation of the PurpleAir network

IF 3.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Atmospheric Environment Pub Date : 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2025.121118
Masoud Ghahremanloo , Yunsoo Choi , Mahmoudreza Momeni
{"title":"Deep learning calibration model for PurpleAir PM2.5 measurements: Comprehensive Investigation of the PurpleAir network","authors":"Masoud Ghahremanloo ,&nbsp;Yunsoo Choi ,&nbsp;Mahmoudreza Momeni","doi":"10.1016/j.atmosenv.2025.121118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The limited number of PM<sub>2.5</sub> monitoring stations from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) across the Contiguous United States (CONUS) restricts PM<sub>2.5</sub> monitoring and associated policymaking efforts. Low-cost PM<sub>2.5</sub> stations, such as those from the PurpleAir network, offer a vital alternative to expand coverage in regions not monitored by the EPA. However, the accuracy of PurpleAir measurements has been questioned. This study introduces a deep learning (DL) approach, specifically a deep convolutional neural network (DeepCNN), to align hourly PM<sub>2.5</sub> data from PurpleAir with EPA PM<sub>2.5</sub> observations across the CONUS for the year 2021. Utilizing over nine million samples from 1595 PurpleAir stations located within 5 km of EPA stations, the DeepCNN demonstrates significant improvements in the agreement between PurpleAir and EPA observations. It increases the correlation coefficient (R) with EPA observations from 0.58 to 0.85 and reduces the mean absolute bias (MAB) from 4.99 to 2.98 μg/m<sup>3</sup>, achieving a 40% reduction in bias. The state-wise cross-validation also underscores the model's generalizability, with an average 11% improvement in R values and a 13% reduction in bias between PurpleAir and EPA PM<sub>2.5</sub> measurements in various states. Comparative analysis reveals that the accuracy of our DL-enhanced PurpleAir PM<sub>2.5</sub> (PM-DL) data significantly surpasses that of five previously established PurpleAir correction models, which show low R values of 0.55–0.58 and MABs ranging from 4.21 to 6.43 μg/m<sup>3</sup> when validated against EPA data. This study underscores the need for more sophisticated models to better align PurpleAir PM<sub>2.5</sub> measurements to EPA standards. The PM-DL data can substantially mitigate the scarcity of reliable institutional PM<sub>2.5</sub> observations across the CONUS. By aligning PurpleAir PM<sub>2.5</sub> data with EPA observations, our model has the potential to augment the existing network with over ten thousand accurate monitoring stations, significantly expanding upon the nearly one thousand EPA stations currently in operation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":250,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Environment","volume":"348 ","pages":"Article 121118"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1352231025000937","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The limited number of PM2.5 monitoring stations from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) across the Contiguous United States (CONUS) restricts PM2.5 monitoring and associated policymaking efforts. Low-cost PM2.5 stations, such as those from the PurpleAir network, offer a vital alternative to expand coverage in regions not monitored by the EPA. However, the accuracy of PurpleAir measurements has been questioned. This study introduces a deep learning (DL) approach, specifically a deep convolutional neural network (DeepCNN), to align hourly PM2.5 data from PurpleAir with EPA PM2.5 observations across the CONUS for the year 2021. Utilizing over nine million samples from 1595 PurpleAir stations located within 5 km of EPA stations, the DeepCNN demonstrates significant improvements in the agreement between PurpleAir and EPA observations. It increases the correlation coefficient (R) with EPA observations from 0.58 to 0.85 and reduces the mean absolute bias (MAB) from 4.99 to 2.98 μg/m3, achieving a 40% reduction in bias. The state-wise cross-validation also underscores the model's generalizability, with an average 11% improvement in R values and a 13% reduction in bias between PurpleAir and EPA PM2.5 measurements in various states. Comparative analysis reveals that the accuracy of our DL-enhanced PurpleAir PM2.5 (PM-DL) data significantly surpasses that of five previously established PurpleAir correction models, which show low R values of 0.55–0.58 and MABs ranging from 4.21 to 6.43 μg/m3 when validated against EPA data. This study underscores the need for more sophisticated models to better align PurpleAir PM2.5 measurements to EPA standards. The PM-DL data can substantially mitigate the scarcity of reliable institutional PM2.5 observations across the CONUS. By aligning PurpleAir PM2.5 data with EPA observations, our model has the potential to augment the existing network with over ten thousand accurate monitoring stations, significantly expanding upon the nearly one thousand EPA stations currently in operation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PurpleAir PM2.5 测量的深度学习校准模型:对 PurpleAir 网络的全面调查
美国环境保护局(EPA)的PM2.5监测站数量有限,限制了PM2.5的监测和相关的政策制定工作。低成本的PM2.5监测站,比如来自PurpleAir网络的监测站,为扩大美国环保署未监测地区的覆盖范围提供了一个重要的选择。然而,PurpleAir测量的准确性受到了质疑。本研究引入了一种深度学习(DL)方法,特别是深度卷积神经网络(DeepCNN),将PurpleAir的每小时PM2.5数据与2021年美国各地的EPA PM2.5观测数据进行比对。DeepCNN利用位于EPA站5公里范围内的1595个PurpleAir站点的900多万个样本,在PurpleAir和EPA观测结果之间的一致性方面取得了显着改善。它将EPA观测值的相关系数(R)从0.58提高到0.85,将平均绝对偏差(MAB)从4.99降低到2.98 μg/m3,偏差降低了40%。各州交叉验证也强调了模型的普遍性,在各州,R值平均提高了11%,PurpleAir和EPA PM2.5测量值之间的偏差减少了13%。对比分析表明,我们的dl增强的PurpleAir PM2.5 (PM-DL)数据的精度显著优于先前建立的5种PurpleAir校正模型,在EPA数据验证时,R值为0.55 ~ 0.58,mab值为4.21 ~ 6.43 μg/m3。这项研究强调需要更复杂的模型来更好地将PurpleAir的PM2.5测量值与EPA标准保持一致。PM-DL数据可以大大缓解整个太平洋地区可靠的机构PM2.5观测的缺乏性。通过将PurpleAir的PM2.5数据与EPA的观测数据相结合,我们的模型有可能在目前运行的近1000个EPA监测站的基础上,扩大现有的超过1万个准确监测站的网络。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Atmospheric Environment
Atmospheric Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
8.00%
发文量
458
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Atmospheric Environment has an open access mirror journal Atmospheric Environment: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. Atmospheric Environment is the international journal for scientists in different disciplines related to atmospheric composition and its impacts. The journal publishes scientific articles with atmospheric relevance of emissions and depositions of gaseous and particulate compounds, chemical processes and physical effects in the atmosphere, as well as impacts of the changing atmospheric composition on human health, air quality, climate change, and ecosystems.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Ozone prediction using a hybrid model incorporating feature selection and extreme sample enhancement in North China Chlorine–mediated enhancement of coastal ozone pollution under long–range transport in eastern China Bioaccessibility and transformation of PM2.5 organics and microbiota in simulated lung fluids: Implications for fluid-specific respiratory risks Pollution characteristics of PM2.5 and PM1.0 at urban and background sites in South Korea: Focusing on health risks of PAHs and heavy metals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1