Estimating leaf and canopy nitrogen contents in major field crops across the growing season from hyperspectral images using nonparametric regression

IF 8.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Computers and Electronics in Agriculture Pub Date : 2025-02-24 DOI:10.1016/j.compag.2025.110147
Dong Wang , Paul C. Struik , Lei Liang , Xinyou Yin
{"title":"Estimating leaf and canopy nitrogen contents in major field crops across the growing season from hyperspectral images using nonparametric regression","authors":"Dong Wang ,&nbsp;Paul C. Struik ,&nbsp;Lei Liang ,&nbsp;Xinyou Yin","doi":"10.1016/j.compag.2025.110147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Estimating leaf nitrogen (N) status is crucial for site- and time-specific crop N management, and can be accomplished more routinely than ever before with the advent of hyperspectral imaging techniques. Yet, there is still a lack of information about how leaf and canopy N of major crops could be predicted from different regression methods, hyperspectral feature types, and prediction pathways. We conducted field experiments with different N supply for rice, wheat and maize, in China. Features of canopy reflectance (Ref), vegetation indices (VIs), and texture information (Tex) were extracted from acquired hyperspectral images. These features and crop developmental stage (DS) were applied to estimate crop N parameters, using five nonparametric regression algorithms: Partial Least Squares Regression (PLSR), Support Vector Regression (SVR), Random Forest Regression, Deep Neural Network, and Convolutional Neural Network. The performance of PLSR and SVR models was significantly better than that of the others when field samples were limited. Use of feature combination in leaf N prediction was identified necessary from the improved model performance after incorporating the features of Ref, Tex, and DS. The prediction of the mass-based leaf N trait, leaf N concentration, was better than that of the area-based trait, specific leaf N (SLN). Values of SLN and canopy leaf-N content were predicted comparably via themselves direct and indirect methods, although indirect procedures involved more steps requiring the prediction of two or more component traits. These results were discussed in view of making use of available regression-models, features and pathways for best predictabilities so as to improve crop N monitoring for sustainable field N management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50627,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture","volume":"233 ","pages":"Article 110147"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168169925002534","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Estimating leaf nitrogen (N) status is crucial for site- and time-specific crop N management, and can be accomplished more routinely than ever before with the advent of hyperspectral imaging techniques. Yet, there is still a lack of information about how leaf and canopy N of major crops could be predicted from different regression methods, hyperspectral feature types, and prediction pathways. We conducted field experiments with different N supply for rice, wheat and maize, in China. Features of canopy reflectance (Ref), vegetation indices (VIs), and texture information (Tex) were extracted from acquired hyperspectral images. These features and crop developmental stage (DS) were applied to estimate crop N parameters, using five nonparametric regression algorithms: Partial Least Squares Regression (PLSR), Support Vector Regression (SVR), Random Forest Regression, Deep Neural Network, and Convolutional Neural Network. The performance of PLSR and SVR models was significantly better than that of the others when field samples were limited. Use of feature combination in leaf N prediction was identified necessary from the improved model performance after incorporating the features of Ref, Tex, and DS. The prediction of the mass-based leaf N trait, leaf N concentration, was better than that of the area-based trait, specific leaf N (SLN). Values of SLN and canopy leaf-N content were predicted comparably via themselves direct and indirect methods, although indirect procedures involved more steps requiring the prediction of two or more component traits. These results were discussed in view of making use of available regression-models, features and pathways for best predictabilities so as to improve crop N monitoring for sustainable field N management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于非参数回归的高光谱图像估算主要大田作物生长季叶片和冠层氮含量
估算叶片氮(N)状态对于特定地点和特定时间的作物氮管理至关重要,随着高光谱成像技术的出现,可以比以往任何时候都更常规地完成。然而,如何通过不同的回归方法、高光谱特征类型和预测途径来预测主要作物的叶片和冠层氮,目前还缺乏相关信息。在中国对水稻、小麦和玉米进行了不同施氮量的田间试验。从获取的高光谱影像中提取冠层反射率(Ref)、植被指数(VIs)和纹理信息(Tex)等特征。利用5种非参数回归算法:偏最小二乘回归(PLSR)、支持向量回归(SVR)、随机森林回归(Random Forest regression)、深度神经网络(Deep Neural Network)和卷积神经网络(Convolutional Neural Network),利用这些特征和作物发育阶段(DS)来估计作物N参数。当现场样本有限时,PLSR和SVR模型的性能显著优于其他模型。结合Ref、Tex和DS的特征后,模型性能得到了改善,因此在叶片N预测中使用特征组合是必要的。以质量为基础的叶片氮含量性状比以面积为基础的比叶氮(SLN)的预测效果更好。直接法和间接法对土壤土壤氮含量和冠层叶氮含量的预测具有可比性,但间接法涉及更多的步骤,需要预测两个或多个组成性状。对这些结果进行了讨论,以期利用现有的回归模型、特征和途径获得最佳预测结果,从而改善作物氮素监测,实现农田氮素的可持续管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
15.30
自引率
14.50%
发文量
800
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Computers and Electronics in Agriculture provides international coverage of advancements in computer hardware, software, electronic instrumentation, and control systems applied to agricultural challenges. Encompassing agronomy, horticulture, forestry, aquaculture, and animal farming, the journal publishes original papers, reviews, and applications notes. It explores the use of computers and electronics in plant or animal agricultural production, covering topics like agricultural soils, water, pests, controlled environments, and waste. The scope extends to on-farm post-harvest operations and relevant technologies, including artificial intelligence, sensors, machine vision, robotics, networking, and simulation modeling. Its companion journal, Smart Agricultural Technology, continues the focus on smart applications in production agriculture.
期刊最新文献
Real-time and explainable non-destructive nut classification using spike-triggered acoustic sensing Precision mapping of soil salinity in reclaiming salt-induced wasteland with UAV multispectral images and machine learning Comparison of soil property predictions in Lithuanian croplands using UAV, satellite, EMI data and machine learning A new generation of embodied intelligent plant protection unmanned vehicle integrated with hydrostatic transmission and four-wheel drive technology: design, development and application Mathematical modeling of tomato ripening: Formulations, validation, and postharvest decision support — A review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1