Innovation in rare earths recycling: A quantitative and qualitative analysis of patent data

IF 10.2 2区 经济学 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Resources Policy Pub Date : 2025-02-24 DOI:10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105519
Riccardo Priore , Marco Compagnoni , Marinella Favot
{"title":"Innovation in rare earths recycling: A quantitative and qualitative analysis of patent data","authors":"Riccardo Priore ,&nbsp;Marco Compagnoni ,&nbsp;Marinella Favot","doi":"10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rare earth elements (REE) are currently essential enablers of the digital and decarbonization transition. However, their supply chain is highly concentrated and their extraction has a high environmental impact. Circular economy solutions could provide a double benefit, reducing supply risk for import-dependent countries and mitigating the impacts of REE mining.</div><div>This article focuses on REE recycling and provides a comprehensive global overview of innovation dynamics in this sector using patent data. We propose a two-step patent search methodology to identify REE recycling patents, based on the OECD ENV-TECH classification for green technologies and keyword occurrence. We then develop a set of quantitative and qualitative metrics to explore innovation dynamics at the country, applicant and technology type level.</div><div>China clearly emerges as the most attractive market for REE recycling patents and Chinese universities as the most active applicants worldwide. Conversely, patent applications in all other countries showed stagnating trends over the last decade. In particular, Europe has a lower number of both patent applications and patents developed compared to the US and Japan. However, patent quality indicators show a very different picture: US and Japanese applicants, who appear to be at the technological forefront, receive more citations and are more oriented towards protecting their inventions internationally. Our analysis therefore highlights the importance of considering both quantitative and qualitative patent metrics when examining innovation trends in REE recycling.</div><div>We discuss the determinants of these observed phenomena, draw policy implications - particularly for REE import-dependent countries - and propose avenues for future research at the intersection of CRM, the circular economy, and innovation studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20970,"journal":{"name":"Resources Policy","volume":"102 ","pages":"Article 105519"},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420725000613","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rare earth elements (REE) are currently essential enablers of the digital and decarbonization transition. However, their supply chain is highly concentrated and their extraction has a high environmental impact. Circular economy solutions could provide a double benefit, reducing supply risk for import-dependent countries and mitigating the impacts of REE mining.
This article focuses on REE recycling and provides a comprehensive global overview of innovation dynamics in this sector using patent data. We propose a two-step patent search methodology to identify REE recycling patents, based on the OECD ENV-TECH classification for green technologies and keyword occurrence. We then develop a set of quantitative and qualitative metrics to explore innovation dynamics at the country, applicant and technology type level.
China clearly emerges as the most attractive market for REE recycling patents and Chinese universities as the most active applicants worldwide. Conversely, patent applications in all other countries showed stagnating trends over the last decade. In particular, Europe has a lower number of both patent applications and patents developed compared to the US and Japan. However, patent quality indicators show a very different picture: US and Japanese applicants, who appear to be at the technological forefront, receive more citations and are more oriented towards protecting their inventions internationally. Our analysis therefore highlights the importance of considering both quantitative and qualitative patent metrics when examining innovation trends in REE recycling.
We discuss the determinants of these observed phenomena, draw policy implications - particularly for REE import-dependent countries - and propose avenues for future research at the intersection of CRM, the circular economy, and innovation studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
稀土回收的创新:专利数据的定量和定性分析
稀土元素(REE)目前是数字化和脱碳转型的重要推动者。然而,它们的供应链高度集中,开采对环境的影响很大。循环经济解决方案可以提供双重效益,既可以降低依赖进口的国家的供应风险,又可以减轻稀土开采的影响。本文重点关注稀土元素回收,并利用专利数据提供了该领域创新动态的全面全球概述。本文提出了一种基于OECD ENV-TECH绿色技术分类和关键词出现率的两步专利检索方法来识别稀土回收专利。然后,我们开发了一套定量和定性指标,以探索国家、申请人和技术类型层面的创新动态。中国显然是稀土元素回收专利最具吸引力的市场,中国大学是全球最活跃的申请者。相反,所有其他国家的专利申请在过去十年中呈现停滞趋势。特别是,与美国和日本相比,欧洲的专利申请和专利开发数量都较低。然而,专利质量指标显示出截然不同的情况:美国和日本的申请人似乎处于技术前沿,他们获得了更多的引用,并且更倾向于在国际上保护自己的发明。因此,我们的分析强调了在研究稀土元素回收的创新趋势时考虑定量和定性专利指标的重要性。我们讨论了这些观察到的现象的决定因素,得出了政策影响-特别是对依赖稀土进口的国家-并提出了未来研究CRM,循环经济和创新研究交叉的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Resources Policy
Resources Policy ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
23.50%
发文量
602
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Resources Policy is an international journal focused on the economics and policy aspects of mineral and fossil fuel extraction, production, and utilization. It targets individuals in academia, government, and industry. The journal seeks original research submissions analyzing public policy, economics, social science, geography, and finance in the fields of mining, non-fuel minerals, energy minerals, fossil fuels, and metals. Mineral economics topics covered include mineral market analysis, price analysis, project evaluation, mining and sustainable development, mineral resource rents, resource curse, mineral wealth and corruption, mineral taxation and regulation, strategic minerals and their supply, and the impact of mineral development on local communities and indigenous populations. The journal specifically excludes papers with agriculture, forestry, or fisheries as their primary focus.
期刊最新文献
Who owns the minerals in polluted mine water? Property rights and institutional barriers to rare earth elements recovery from acid mine drainage Temporalities of mining and displacement/resettlement in Mozambique's coal frontier Improving productivity in mine loading and hauling operations through OEE analysis A two-sector model of resource depletion in Peruvian mining districts: Bayesian Model Averaging calibration and 3D phase diagram analysis Quantifying operational uncertainties in mining machinery fleet productivity using a stochastic Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1