Risk factors and prognosis of acute ischemic stroke related restless legs syndrome

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Sleep medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1016/j.sleep.2025.02.030
Xi-Xi Wang , Ye Liu , Jia-Min Song , Yu-Lei Zhang , Yu Wang , Ondo G. William , Ya Feng , Yun-Cheng Wu
{"title":"Risk factors and prognosis of acute ischemic stroke related restless legs syndrome","authors":"Xi-Xi Wang ,&nbsp;Ye Liu ,&nbsp;Jia-Min Song ,&nbsp;Yu-Lei Zhang ,&nbsp;Yu Wang ,&nbsp;Ondo G. William ,&nbsp;Ya Feng ,&nbsp;Yun-Cheng Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.sleep.2025.02.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Recent studies suggest that stroke may be associated with an increased prevalence of restless legs syndrome (RLS) as a comorbidity or a risk factor. We aimed to explore the association between acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and RLS, and the possible pathogenesis of acute ischemic stroke related restless legs syndrome (AIS-RLS), for guiding its diagnosis and treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this single-center, prospective study, we identified consecutive AIS patients and segregated into AIS-RLS group and non-AIS-RLS group based on the diagnostic criteria of RLS. The differences in baseline data, clinical features, examination results, stroke etiology, stroke location, and clinical prognosis (functional disability, cognitive and mood disorders) of the two groups were analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the risk factors for RLS.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 201 AIS patients were included in our study, and 21 (10.45 %) demonstrated RLS. Compared with non-AIS-RLS group, AIS-RLS group patients had higher systolic blood pressure (SBP) at admission (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05), higher mean 24-h SBP (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01), higher mean 24-h diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01), higher mean daytime SBP (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01), higher mean daytime DBP (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01), higher mean nocturnal SBP (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01), higher mean nocturnal DBP (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05), smaller variation coefficient of 24-h SBP (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). The distribution of AIS-RLS and non-AIS-RLS was not different for each subtype according to the cortical and subcortical classification of lesion sites. The NIHSS score, GAD-7 score and PHQ-9 score were higher at 7 days (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05), and the modified Rankin scale (mRS) was higher at 3 months follow-up (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05) in the AIS-RLS group. In the logistic regression, the higher SBP at admission had a statistically significant effect on AIS-RLS(OR = 1.030,<em>P</em> = 0.016)even after adjusting for age and gender(OR = 1.030,<em>P</em> = 0.014).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Stroke anatomy did not differ between AIS-RLS and non-AIS-RLS groups. AIS-RLS group patients tend to experience higher blood pressure. Moreover, AIS-RLS patients had worse clinical prognosis (functional disability and mood disorders) compared with non-AIS-RLS patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21874,"journal":{"name":"Sleep medicine","volume":"129 ","pages":"Pages 75-81"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389945725000814","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Recent studies suggest that stroke may be associated with an increased prevalence of restless legs syndrome (RLS) as a comorbidity or a risk factor. We aimed to explore the association between acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and RLS, and the possible pathogenesis of acute ischemic stroke related restless legs syndrome (AIS-RLS), for guiding its diagnosis and treatment.

Methods

In this single-center, prospective study, we identified consecutive AIS patients and segregated into AIS-RLS group and non-AIS-RLS group based on the diagnostic criteria of RLS. The differences in baseline data, clinical features, examination results, stroke etiology, stroke location, and clinical prognosis (functional disability, cognitive and mood disorders) of the two groups were analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the risk factors for RLS.

Results

A total of 201 AIS patients were included in our study, and 21 (10.45 %) demonstrated RLS. Compared with non-AIS-RLS group, AIS-RLS group patients had higher systolic blood pressure (SBP) at admission (P < 0.05), higher mean 24-h SBP (P < 0.01), higher mean 24-h diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (P < 0.01), higher mean daytime SBP (P < 0.01), higher mean daytime DBP (P < 0.01), higher mean nocturnal SBP (P < 0.01), higher mean nocturnal DBP (P < 0.05), smaller variation coefficient of 24-h SBP (P < 0.05). The distribution of AIS-RLS and non-AIS-RLS was not different for each subtype according to the cortical and subcortical classification of lesion sites. The NIHSS score, GAD-7 score and PHQ-9 score were higher at 7 days (P < 0.05), and the modified Rankin scale (mRS) was higher at 3 months follow-up (P < 0.05) in the AIS-RLS group. In the logistic regression, the higher SBP at admission had a statistically significant effect on AIS-RLS(OR = 1.030,P = 0.016)even after adjusting for age and gender(OR = 1.030,P = 0.014).

Conclusion

Stroke anatomy did not differ between AIS-RLS and non-AIS-RLS groups. AIS-RLS group patients tend to experience higher blood pressure. Moreover, AIS-RLS patients had worse clinical prognosis (functional disability and mood disorders) compared with non-AIS-RLS patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性缺血性卒中相关不宁腿综合征的危险因素及预后
最近的研究表明,中风可能与不宁腿综合征(RLS)的患病率增加有关,作为一种合并症或一种危险因素。我们旨在探讨急性缺血性卒中(AIS)与不宁腿综合征(AIS-RLS)之间的关系,以及急性缺血性卒中相关不宁腿综合征(AIS-RLS)可能的发病机制,以指导其诊断和治疗。方法本研究为单中心前瞻性研究,选取连续AIS患者,根据RLS的诊断标准分为AIS-RLS组和非AIS-RLS组。分析两组患者基线资料、临床特征、检查结果、脑卒中病因、脑卒中部位、临床预后(功能障碍、认知和情绪障碍)的差异。采用Logistic回归分析评价RLS的危险因素。结果共纳入201例AIS患者,其中21例(10.45%)表现为RLS。与非AIS-RLS组相比,AIS-RLS组患者入院时收缩压(SBP)较高(P <;0.05),平均24小时收缩压升高(P <;0.01),平均24小时舒张压(DBP)升高(P <;0.01),白天平均收缩压较高(P <;0.01),日间平均DBP较高(P <;0.01),夜间平均收缩压增高(P <;0.01),夜间平均舒张压较高(P <;0.05), 24 h收缩压变异系数较小(P <;0.05)。各亚型的AIS-RLS和非AIS-RLS的分布根据病变部位的皮层和皮层下分类无明显差异。NIHSS评分、GAD-7评分和PHQ-9评分在第7天较高(P <;改良Rankin量表(mRS)在随访3个月时较高(P <;0.05)。在logistic回归中,即使调整了年龄和性别(OR = 1.030,P = 0.014),入院时较高的收缩压对AIS-RLS的影响也有统计学意义(OR = 1.030,P = 0.016)。结论AIS-RLS组与非AIS-RLS组脑卒中解剖无明显差异。AIS-RLS组患者血压升高。与非AIS-RLS患者相比,AIS-RLS患者的临床预后(功能障碍和情绪障碍)更差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sleep medicine
Sleep medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
1060
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Sleep Medicine aims to be a journal no one involved in clinical sleep medicine can do without. A journal primarily focussing on the human aspects of sleep, integrating the various disciplines that are involved in sleep medicine: neurology, clinical neurophysiology, internal medicine (particularly pulmonology and cardiology), psychology, psychiatry, sleep technology, pediatrics, neurosurgery, otorhinolaryngology, and dentistry. The journal publishes the following types of articles: Reviews (also intended as a way to bridge the gap between basic sleep research and clinical relevance); Original Research Articles; Full-length articles; Brief communications; Controversies; Case reports; Letters to the Editor; Journal search and commentaries; Book reviews; Meeting announcements; Listing of relevant organisations plus web sites.
期刊最新文献
Residual sleep disordered breathing under ventilatory support in children: a polysomnography study. More than half of senior intensivists have a poor sleep quality A multicentre survey in France. Modeling daily sleep-gaming processes in high-risk gamers: A dynamic structural equation approach combining wearable tracking and self-report data. Psychobiological personality traits in adults with disorders of arousal: A case-control study. Mandibular advancement devices and treatment-emergent central sleep apnea (TECSA): Coincidental or critical finding?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1