Comparative analysis of integrating different power cycles into a concentrated solar power plant

IF 6.3 2区 材料科学 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells Pub Date : 2025-02-24 DOI:10.1016/j.solmat.2025.113534
Mohamed Elamine Abdesselem , Taqiy Eddine Boukelia , Mohamed Salah Mecibah
{"title":"Comparative analysis of integrating different power cycles into a concentrated solar power plant","authors":"Mohamed Elamine Abdesselem ,&nbsp;Taqiy Eddine Boukelia ,&nbsp;Mohamed Salah Mecibah","doi":"10.1016/j.solmat.2025.113534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A techno-economic analysis of integrating three different cycles into a concentrated solar power plant is performed. The steam Rankine, organic Rankine, and Kalina cycles were compared in terms of hourly and annual basis. These three layouts were analyzed over the year to determine the most appropriate layout based on performance and cost. The results revealed that the steam Rankine cycle generates 8.38 GWh of power annually, surpassing the 7.90GWh from the Kalina cycle and the 7.72GWh from the organic Rankine cycle. Economically, the organic Rankine cycle was more economical in terms of initial and operational costs, as well as the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) of 16.30¢$/kWh; additionally, the Kalina cycle, while efficient, was costly in addition to the high LCOE of 17.45¢$/kWh, and it was the lowest value of LCOE in the layout running on the steam Rankine cycle of 16.10¢$/kWh. The results of this study provide important insights into the effectiveness of each power cycle in solar power plants, helping to choose the most suitable based on performance, efficiency, hydrogen production, and cost.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":429,"journal":{"name":"Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells","volume":"285 ","pages":"Article 113534"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927024825001357","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A techno-economic analysis of integrating three different cycles into a concentrated solar power plant is performed. The steam Rankine, organic Rankine, and Kalina cycles were compared in terms of hourly and annual basis. These three layouts were analyzed over the year to determine the most appropriate layout based on performance and cost. The results revealed that the steam Rankine cycle generates 8.38 GWh of power annually, surpassing the 7.90GWh from the Kalina cycle and the 7.72GWh from the organic Rankine cycle. Economically, the organic Rankine cycle was more economical in terms of initial and operational costs, as well as the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) of 16.30¢$/kWh; additionally, the Kalina cycle, while efficient, was costly in addition to the high LCOE of 17.45¢$/kWh, and it was the lowest value of LCOE in the layout running on the steam Rankine cycle of 16.10¢$/kWh. The results of this study provide important insights into the effectiveness of each power cycle in solar power plants, helping to choose the most suitable based on performance, efficiency, hydrogen production, and cost.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将不同的电力循环整合到一个聚光太阳能发电厂的比较分析
对将三种不同的循环集成到一个聚光太阳能发电厂进行了技术经济分析。以小时和年为基础比较了蒸汽朗肯循环、有机朗肯循环和卡利纳循环。对这三种布局进行了一年的分析,以根据性能和成本确定最合适的布局。结果表明,蒸汽朗肯循环的年发电量为8.38 GWh,超过了Kalina循环的7.90GWh和有机朗肯循环的7.72GWh。经济上,有机朗肯循环在初始成本和运行成本以及16.30美分/千瓦时的平准化电力成本(LCOE)方面更为经济;此外,Kalina循环虽然效率高,但LCOE高达17.45¢$/kWh,并且是蒸汽朗肯循环(16.10¢$/kWh)上运行的布局中LCOE最低的。这项研究的结果为太阳能发电厂每个电力周期的有效性提供了重要的见解,有助于根据性能、效率、氢气产量和成本选择最合适的太阳能发电厂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells
Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
11.60%
发文量
513
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells is intended as a vehicle for the dissemination of research results on materials science and technology related to photovoltaic, photothermal and photoelectrochemical solar energy conversion. Materials science is taken in the broadest possible sense and encompasses physics, chemistry, optics, materials fabrication and analysis for all types of materials.
期刊最新文献
Radiative cooling optimization of flexible nanocomposites considering medium absorption Interface-induced self-assembly strategy for constructing core-shell nanoparticles to enhance the thermal transfer performance of composite phase change materials Application of advanced plasma treatment in the a-Si:H(i)/μc-SiOxH(n) interface of silicon heterojunction solar cells Toward scalable solar cells: optimizing atmospheric-pressure spatial atomic layer deposition SnOX for enhanced perovskite crystallization and performance All-weather outdoor microfibrous fabrics with radiative cooling and mechanical robustness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1