Process model and comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of a biorefinery concept based on fractionated subcritical water hydrolysis for sugar cane trash valorization
Gabriel Morales-Gutiérrez, Víctor Marulanda-Cardona
{"title":"Process model and comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of a biorefinery concept based on fractionated subcritical water hydrolysis for sugar cane trash valorization","authors":"Gabriel Morales-Gutiérrez, Víctor Marulanda-Cardona","doi":"10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.107740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Subcritical water hydrolysis, which incorporates depolymerization, reaction and separation of sugars from biomass, has been proposed as an alternative to conventional hydrolysis. Since this process does not require chemicals, it could potentially lead to simpler biorefinery schemes. Yet, high water to biomass (S/F) mass ratios reported in experimental studies could limit technical feasibility for scaling-up purposes, as well as resulting in an inferior environmental performance due to the production of highly diluted sugar fractions. Therefore, in this study a biorefinery model based on fractionated subcritical water hydrolysis of sugar cane trash was proposed and simulated for (S/F) ratios in the range 7.5–24, based on previously reported experimental results and simulation studies, to assess the effect of mass and energy inputs in the environmental performance when compared to the conventional acid-enzymatic process by means of a gate-to-gate LCA assessment. LCA results showed inferior environmental performance of the proposed process with (S/F) of 12 and 24, ratios considerably lower than those usually employed in experimental studies, which is mainly the result of the energy requirements as steam production. Yet, a (S/F) ratio of 7.5 showed an improved environmental performance in 12 out of 18 categories assessed, which was attributed not only to the decreased energy consumption but also to the elimination of additional environmental burdens such as the production of chemicals and enzymes. These results suggest further experimental research should focus on reducing (S/F) ratios in experimental studies in order to advance the technical feasibility of the proposed process.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":253,"journal":{"name":"Biomass & Bioenergy","volume":"196 ","pages":"Article 107740"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomass & Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0961953425001515","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Subcritical water hydrolysis, which incorporates depolymerization, reaction and separation of sugars from biomass, has been proposed as an alternative to conventional hydrolysis. Since this process does not require chemicals, it could potentially lead to simpler biorefinery schemes. Yet, high water to biomass (S/F) mass ratios reported in experimental studies could limit technical feasibility for scaling-up purposes, as well as resulting in an inferior environmental performance due to the production of highly diluted sugar fractions. Therefore, in this study a biorefinery model based on fractionated subcritical water hydrolysis of sugar cane trash was proposed and simulated for (S/F) ratios in the range 7.5–24, based on previously reported experimental results and simulation studies, to assess the effect of mass and energy inputs in the environmental performance when compared to the conventional acid-enzymatic process by means of a gate-to-gate LCA assessment. LCA results showed inferior environmental performance of the proposed process with (S/F) of 12 and 24, ratios considerably lower than those usually employed in experimental studies, which is mainly the result of the energy requirements as steam production. Yet, a (S/F) ratio of 7.5 showed an improved environmental performance in 12 out of 18 categories assessed, which was attributed not only to the decreased energy consumption but also to the elimination of additional environmental burdens such as the production of chemicals and enzymes. These results suggest further experimental research should focus on reducing (S/F) ratios in experimental studies in order to advance the technical feasibility of the proposed process.
期刊介绍:
Biomass & Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers and short communications, review articles and case studies on biological resources, chemical and biological processes, and biomass products for new renewable sources of energy and materials.
The scope of the journal extends to the environmental, management and economic aspects of biomass and bioenergy.
Key areas covered by the journal:
• Biomass: sources, energy crop production processes, genetic improvements, composition. Please note that research on these biomass subjects must be linked directly to bioenergy generation.
• Biological Residues: residues/rests from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (palm, sugar etc), processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW). Papers on the use of biomass residues through innovative processes/technological novelty and/or consideration of feedstock/system sustainability (or unsustainability) are welcomed. However waste treatment processes and pollution control or mitigation which are only tangentially related to bioenergy are not in the scope of the journal, as they are more suited to publications in the environmental arena. Papers that describe conventional waste streams (ie well described in existing literature) that do not empirically address ''new'' added value from the process are not suitable for submission to the journal.
• Bioenergy Processes: fermentations, thermochemical conversions, liquid and gaseous fuels, and petrochemical substitutes
• Bioenergy Utilization: direct combustion, gasification, electricity production, chemical processes, and by-product remediation
• Biomass and the Environment: carbon cycle, the net energy efficiency of bioenergy systems, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues.