Characterising airway inflammation in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and non-Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adults with asthma and COPD.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM BMJ Open Respiratory Research Pub Date : 2025-02-22 DOI:10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002619
Nick Young, Winnie Chen, Shimul Chatterjee, Scott Gelzinnis, Aishath Lam'aan Latheef, Jodie Simpson, Peter A B Wark
{"title":"Characterising airway inflammation in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and non-Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adults with asthma and COPD.","authors":"Nick Young, Winnie Chen, Shimul Chatterjee, Scott Gelzinnis, Aishath Lam'aan Latheef, Jodie Simpson, Peter A B Wark","doi":"10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine airway inflammatory cell profiles in Indigenous Australian adults with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).</p><p><strong>Design/setting: </strong>A retrospective, cross-sectional study on data from a tertiary referral respiratory outpatient clinic.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Indigenous (n=23) and non-Indigenous (n=71) adults were matched according to diagnosis, gender and age to the ratio of 1:3.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Participants were defined by self-determined identification as Indigenous (Aboriginal) or non-Indigenous. A relevant history was taken, and lung function was measured by spirometry. In those with a diagnosis of asthma, symptom control was assessed by the Asthma Control Questionnaire, six items (ACQ6). In those with a diagnosis of COPD, symptoms were assessed by the COPD assessment test (CAT). Airway cell counts were obtained in all groups from bronchial lavage (BL) cell count.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Lung function and inhaled corticosteroid dose were similar between groups. Current smoking was three times more common in Indigenous people (35%) compared with non-Indigenous people (12%, p=0.009). In participants with asthma, ACQ6 scores were similar between Indigenous and non-Indigenous participants with asthma. In those with COPD, Indigenous participants had significantly higher total CAT scores as well as scores for cough and sputum with a score indicating a high impact on quality of life (CAT score ≥14, 85%-25%, p=0.017). There was no difference in BL cell differential counts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Indigenous people with COPD had higher smoking rates, worsened CAT scores and more symptoms of cough and sputum production. There were no differences between the groups in airway inflammation, but neutrophilic inflammation was associated with poorly-controlled asthma.</p>","PeriodicalId":9048,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11848662/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002619","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine airway inflammatory cell profiles in Indigenous Australian adults with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Design/setting: A retrospective, cross-sectional study on data from a tertiary referral respiratory outpatient clinic.

Participants: Indigenous (n=23) and non-Indigenous (n=71) adults were matched according to diagnosis, gender and age to the ratio of 1:3.

Main outcome measures: Participants were defined by self-determined identification as Indigenous (Aboriginal) or non-Indigenous. A relevant history was taken, and lung function was measured by spirometry. In those with a diagnosis of asthma, symptom control was assessed by the Asthma Control Questionnaire, six items (ACQ6). In those with a diagnosis of COPD, symptoms were assessed by the COPD assessment test (CAT). Airway cell counts were obtained in all groups from bronchial lavage (BL) cell count.

Results: Lung function and inhaled corticosteroid dose were similar between groups. Current smoking was three times more common in Indigenous people (35%) compared with non-Indigenous people (12%, p=0.009). In participants with asthma, ACQ6 scores were similar between Indigenous and non-Indigenous participants with asthma. In those with COPD, Indigenous participants had significantly higher total CAT scores as well as scores for cough and sputum with a score indicating a high impact on quality of life (CAT score ≥14, 85%-25%, p=0.017). There was no difference in BL cell differential counts.

Conclusions: Indigenous people with COPD had higher smoking rates, worsened CAT scores and more symptoms of cough and sputum production. There were no differences between the groups in airway inflammation, but neutrophilic inflammation was associated with poorly-controlled asthma.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民与非原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民成人哮喘和COPD的气道炎症特征
目的:研究澳大利亚土著成人哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者气道炎症细胞谱。设计/设置:对三级转诊呼吸门诊的数据进行回顾性横断面研究。参与者:土著人(n=23)和非土著人(n=71)成年人根据诊断、性别和年龄按1:3的比例配对。主要结果测量:参与者通过自我认同定义为土著(原住民)或非土著。记录相关病史,肺活量测定法测定肺功能。在诊断为哮喘的患者中,通过哮喘控制问卷(asthma control Questionnaire, ACQ6)评估症状控制。在诊断为COPD的患者中,通过COPD评估试验(CAT)评估症状。各组气道细胞计数采用支气管灌洗(BL)法。结果:两组间肺功能及吸入皮质类固醇剂量相近。土著居民(35%)目前吸烟的比例是非土著居民(12%,p=0.009)的三倍。在哮喘患者中,土著和非土著哮喘患者的ACQ6评分相似。在COPD患者中,原住民参与者的总CAT评分以及咳嗽和痰液评分均显著较高,且CAT评分≥14,85%-25%,p=0.017)对生活质量的影响较高。两组间BL细胞差异计数无差异。结论:土著COPD患者的吸烟率更高,CAT评分更差,咳嗽和咳痰症状更多。两组间气道炎症无差异,但中性粒细胞炎症与哮喘控制不良相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
BMJ Open Respiratory Research RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
95
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Respiratory Research is a peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing respiratory and critical care medicine. It is the sister journal to Thorax and co-owned by the British Thoracic Society and BMJ. The journal focuses on robustness of methodology and scientific rigour with less emphasis on novelty or perceived impact. BMJ Open Respiratory Research operates a rapid review process, with continuous publication online, ensuring timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal publishes review articles and all research study types: Basic science including laboratory based experiments and animal models, Pilot studies or proof of concept, Observational studies, Study protocols, Registries, Clinical trials from phase I to multicentre randomised clinical trials, Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
期刊最新文献
PRHOCARER study: protocol for a multicentre, convergent, mixed-methods trial assessing the effectiveness of pulmonary rehabilitation programmes and the needs of informal carers of people with chronic respiratory diseases. Asthma prevalence, associated factors and role of adverse childhood experiences among school-going adolescents: the national School Health Survey in Togo (SHeST-study). Characterising the allergen landscape in paediatric allergic rhinitis and/or asthma. Sociodemographic differences in clinical phenotypes among patients with COPD: a latent class analysis. Characterisation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in never-smokers and ever-smokers from a population-based cohort.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1