Green infrastructure has weak conceptual links with efficient biodiversity conservation

IF 5.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Ambio Pub Date : 2025-02-22 DOI:10.1007/s13280-025-02149-1
Johan Ekroos, Maria von Post, Anna S. Persson, Martin Stjernman, Ola Olsson
{"title":"Green infrastructure has weak conceptual links with efficient biodiversity conservation","authors":"Johan Ekroos,&nbsp;Maria von Post,&nbsp;Anna S. Persson,&nbsp;Martin Stjernman,&nbsp;Ola Olsson","doi":"10.1007/s13280-025-02149-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To reverse biodiversity loss, creating resilient ecological networks has been promoted in policy and practice. However, we argue that emphasising networks within policy without clear conservation prioritisations may direct focus away from ecological processes important for population persistence. We studied the rationale for resilient ecological networks represented in a policy context, by reviewing research related to biodiversity within the concept of green infrastructure in European policy. We compared this outcome with underlying empirical evidence for effects of landscape properties on ecological processes relevant to population persistence. We show that interventions within green infrastructure research partly diverge from evidence of efficient conservation derived from empirical studies, likely linked to an insufficient acknowledgement of ecological processes determining long-term conservation of populations in GI policy and research. We discuss possible implications for biodiversity conservation and argue for upcoming policies to better integrate scientific evidence and underlying ecological processes to improve biodiversity outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":461,"journal":{"name":"Ambio","volume":"54 7","pages":"1153 - 1164"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12133648/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ambio","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13280-025-02149-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To reverse biodiversity loss, creating resilient ecological networks has been promoted in policy and practice. However, we argue that emphasising networks within policy without clear conservation prioritisations may direct focus away from ecological processes important for population persistence. We studied the rationale for resilient ecological networks represented in a policy context, by reviewing research related to biodiversity within the concept of green infrastructure in European policy. We compared this outcome with underlying empirical evidence for effects of landscape properties on ecological processes relevant to population persistence. We show that interventions within green infrastructure research partly diverge from evidence of efficient conservation derived from empirical studies, likely linked to an insufficient acknowledgement of ecological processes determining long-term conservation of populations in GI policy and research. We discuss possible implications for biodiversity conservation and argue for upcoming policies to better integrate scientific evidence and underlying ecological processes to improve biodiversity outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绿色基础设施与有效的生物多样性保护之间的概念联系较弱。
为了扭转生物多样性的丧失,建立有弹性的生态网络在政策和实践中得到了促进。然而,我们认为,在没有明确保护优先级的情况下,在政策中强调网络可能会将注意力从对种群持久性重要的生态过程中转移开。我们通过回顾欧洲政策中绿色基础设施概念中与生物多样性相关的研究,研究了弹性生态网络在政策背景下的基本原理。我们将这一结果与景观特性对与种群持久性相关的生态过程影响的潜在经验证据进行了比较。我们表明,绿色基础设施研究中的干预措施部分偏离了从实证研究中得出的有效保护证据,这可能与地理标志政策和研究中对决定种群长期保护的生态过程的认识不足有关。我们讨论了生物多样性保护的可能影响,并提出了未来的政策,以更好地整合科学证据和潜在的生态过程,以改善生物多样性的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ambio
Ambio 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
14.30
自引率
3.10%
发文量
123
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Explores the link between anthropogenic activities and the environment, Ambio encourages multi- or interdisciplinary submissions with explicit management or policy recommendations. Ambio addresses the scientific, social, economic, and cultural factors that influence the condition of the human environment. Ambio particularly encourages multi- or inter-disciplinary submissions with explicit management or policy recommendations. For more than 45 years Ambio has brought international perspective to important developments in environmental research, policy and related activities for an international readership of specialists, generalists, students, decision-makers and interested laymen.
期刊最新文献
From the Gobi to the Sahel: Can China's anti-desertification model work in Africa? Navigating complexity: A guide and tools for interdisciplinary research on lower-carbon practices. How is energy poverty linked with citizen perceptions of financial support for low-carbon housing? A golden opportunity: Corporate sustainability reporting as a key lever to address nature-related risks. Mapping biocultural diversity: An integrative spatial approach to inform conservation and management decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1