Patients' experiences with pain and bleeding in first-trimester abortion care.

IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY American journal of obstetrics and gynecology Pub Date : 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2025.02.030
Katherine M Mahoney, Rachel Mckean, Arden McAllister, Cecelia Tannous-Taylor, Courtney A Schreiber
{"title":"Patients' experiences with pain and bleeding in first-trimester abortion care.","authors":"Katherine M Mahoney, Rachel Mckean, Arden McAllister, Cecelia Tannous-Taylor, Courtney A Schreiber","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2025.02.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Abortion care is safe and commonly needed. While pain and bleeding are expected, patients' experience of pain and bleeding at the time of abortion can affect patient satisfaction and the abortion experience. There is limited research characterizing factors associated with patient-reported severe pain and heavy bleeding with contemporary abortion methods.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess clinical predictors of patient-reported heavy bleeding and pain among first-trimester abortion patients.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We conducted a secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective cohort study of 644 participants undergoing medication or procedural abortion up to 11w6d. The primary outcome was participant-reported severe post-abortion pain; secondary outcomes included bleeding severity and discordance between expected and experienced pain and bleeding. We developed logistic regression models assessing clinical factors associated with severe pain, heavy bleeding, more than expected pain, and heavier than expected bleeding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 644 eligible participants, 516 (80%) responded, 347 (67%) of whom had medication abortion and 169 (33%) of whom had procedural abortion. One-fourth reported severe pain, 35.0% heavy bleeding, 31.6% more than expected pain, and 33.5% heavier than expected bleeding. Factors most strongly associated with participant-reported severe pain included medication abortion (OR=4.69 [95% C1: 2.56-8.58]), history of severe menstrual pain (OR=2.60 [95% CI: 1.38-4.89]), and screening positive for depression at baseline (OR=2.13 [95% CI: 1.18-3.85]). Independent risk factors for pain discordance included first abortion experience (aOR=2.03 [95% CI: 1.18-3.48]), nulliparity (aOR=2.21 [95% CI: 1.26-3.85]), history of a prior cesarean delivery (aOR= 2.06 [95% CI: 1.14-3.72]), and baseline depression (aOR=1.72 [95%CI: 1.05-2.82), adjusted for gravidity, abortion method, and location of care. Self-reported heavy bleeding was most strongly associated with medication abortion regimen (aOR=9.19 [95% CI: 5.09-16.61]) and screening positive for depression at baseline (aOR=2.15 [95% CI: 1.28-3.61]). Abortion method and gestational length were the only significant predictors of discordance between bleeding expectations and experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While most patients were prepared for the pain and bleeding experienced after abortion, the patient experience may be improved by anticipatory guidance that incorporates risk factors for severe pain and heavy bleeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2025.02.030","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Abortion care is safe and commonly needed. While pain and bleeding are expected, patients' experience of pain and bleeding at the time of abortion can affect patient satisfaction and the abortion experience. There is limited research characterizing factors associated with patient-reported severe pain and heavy bleeding with contemporary abortion methods.

Objective: To assess clinical predictors of patient-reported heavy bleeding and pain among first-trimester abortion patients.

Study design: We conducted a secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective cohort study of 644 participants undergoing medication or procedural abortion up to 11w6d. The primary outcome was participant-reported severe post-abortion pain; secondary outcomes included bleeding severity and discordance between expected and experienced pain and bleeding. We developed logistic regression models assessing clinical factors associated with severe pain, heavy bleeding, more than expected pain, and heavier than expected bleeding.

Results: Of 644 eligible participants, 516 (80%) responded, 347 (67%) of whom had medication abortion and 169 (33%) of whom had procedural abortion. One-fourth reported severe pain, 35.0% heavy bleeding, 31.6% more than expected pain, and 33.5% heavier than expected bleeding. Factors most strongly associated with participant-reported severe pain included medication abortion (OR=4.69 [95% C1: 2.56-8.58]), history of severe menstrual pain (OR=2.60 [95% CI: 1.38-4.89]), and screening positive for depression at baseline (OR=2.13 [95% CI: 1.18-3.85]). Independent risk factors for pain discordance included first abortion experience (aOR=2.03 [95% CI: 1.18-3.48]), nulliparity (aOR=2.21 [95% CI: 1.26-3.85]), history of a prior cesarean delivery (aOR= 2.06 [95% CI: 1.14-3.72]), and baseline depression (aOR=1.72 [95%CI: 1.05-2.82), adjusted for gravidity, abortion method, and location of care. Self-reported heavy bleeding was most strongly associated with medication abortion regimen (aOR=9.19 [95% CI: 5.09-16.61]) and screening positive for depression at baseline (aOR=2.15 [95% CI: 1.28-3.61]). Abortion method and gestational length were the only significant predictors of discordance between bleeding expectations and experience.

Conclusion: While most patients were prepared for the pain and bleeding experienced after abortion, the patient experience may be improved by anticipatory guidance that incorporates risk factors for severe pain and heavy bleeding.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
2237
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, known as "The Gray Journal," covers the entire spectrum of Obstetrics and Gynecology. It aims to publish original research (clinical and translational), reviews, opinions, video clips, podcasts, and interviews that contribute to understanding health and disease and have the potential to impact the practice of women's healthcare. Focus Areas: Diagnosis, Treatment, Prediction, and Prevention: The journal focuses on research related to the diagnosis, treatment, prediction, and prevention of obstetrical and gynecological disorders. Biology of Reproduction: AJOG publishes work on the biology of reproduction, including studies on reproductive physiology and mechanisms of obstetrical and gynecological diseases. Content Types: Original Research: Clinical and translational research articles. Reviews: Comprehensive reviews providing insights into various aspects of obstetrics and gynecology. Opinions: Perspectives and opinions on important topics in the field. Multimedia Content: Video clips, podcasts, and interviews. Peer Review Process: All submissions undergo a rigorous peer review process to ensure quality and relevance to the field of obstetrics and gynecology.
期刊最新文献
Commentary on distinct obstetrical characteristics and maternal mortality in patients with HELLP syndrome vs severe preeclampsia. Key actions to improve linkage to care for pregnant and postpartum women with hepatitis C. Should we focus on endometrial-free closure technique? Optimizing patient selection and technique for occiput posterior vacuum extraction - Reply. Optimizing patient selection and technique for occiput posterior vacuum extraction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1