Altered attentional control process of individuals with high test anxiety: An exploratory fMRI study

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Behavioural Brain Research Pub Date : 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1016/j.bbr.2025.115486
Lulu Hou , Wenpei Zhang , Qiong Huang , Renlai Zhou
{"title":"Altered attentional control process of individuals with high test anxiety: An exploratory fMRI study","authors":"Lulu Hou ,&nbsp;Wenpei Zhang ,&nbsp;Qiong Huang ,&nbsp;Renlai Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.bbr.2025.115486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Test anxiety (TA) has been linked to abnormalities in attentional control not only for test-related information but also in situations where irrelevant information has to be ignored. However, the neural basis of individuals with high TA (HTA) when exposed to interference from different types of information remains limited. Twenty-two individuals with HTA and twenty-three individuals with low TA (LTA) completed a Stroop task integrating emotional-word and color-word Stroop tasks. Participants were instructed to assess the font color of neutral words, generally threatening words, test-related threatening words, color-congruent words, and color-incongruent words. Functional magnetic resonance imaging data were recorded simultaneously as the task was completed. The results indicated that compared with LTA group, HTA group exhibited higher activation in the right postcentral gyrus, left cerebellum, right calcarine gyrus, and left inferior parietal lobule when individuals were exposed to interference by test-related threatening words as opposed to neutral words. However, no clusters with significant group-related differences were found when individuals were exposed to interference by generally threatening words and color-incongruent words. These results suggested that differences in attentional control processes between high- and low-test anxiety groups were mainly limited to test-related threatening stimuli and did not extend to generally threatening and cognitively task-irrelevant stimuli.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8823,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Brain Research","volume":"484 ","pages":"Article 115486"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166432825000725","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Test anxiety (TA) has been linked to abnormalities in attentional control not only for test-related information but also in situations where irrelevant information has to be ignored. However, the neural basis of individuals with high TA (HTA) when exposed to interference from different types of information remains limited. Twenty-two individuals with HTA and twenty-three individuals with low TA (LTA) completed a Stroop task integrating emotional-word and color-word Stroop tasks. Participants were instructed to assess the font color of neutral words, generally threatening words, test-related threatening words, color-congruent words, and color-incongruent words. Functional magnetic resonance imaging data were recorded simultaneously as the task was completed. The results indicated that compared with LTA group, HTA group exhibited higher activation in the right postcentral gyrus, left cerebellum, right calcarine gyrus, and left inferior parietal lobule when individuals were exposed to interference by test-related threatening words as opposed to neutral words. However, no clusters with significant group-related differences were found when individuals were exposed to interference by generally threatening words and color-incongruent words. These results suggested that differences in attentional control processes between high- and low-test anxiety groups were mainly limited to test-related threatening stimuli and did not extend to generally threatening and cognitively task-irrelevant stimuli.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioural Brain Research
Behavioural Brain Research 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
383
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Behavioural Brain Research is an international, interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the publication of articles in the field of behavioural neuroscience, broadly defined. Contributions from the entire range of disciplines that comprise the neurosciences, behavioural sciences or cognitive sciences are appropriate, as long as the goal is to delineate the neural mechanisms underlying behaviour. Thus, studies may range from neurophysiological, neuroanatomical, neurochemical or neuropharmacological analysis of brain-behaviour relations, including the use of molecular genetic or behavioural genetic approaches, to studies that involve the use of brain imaging techniques, to neuroethological studies. Reports of original research, of major methodological advances, or of novel conceptual approaches are all encouraged. The journal will also consider critical reviews on selected topics.
期刊最新文献
Muscarinic cholinergic system of the dorsal hippocampus involvement in the modulation of formalin-induced orofacial nociception and relevant memory impairment in rats Identification of Prolyl endopeptidase as a novel anti-depression target of Genipin-1-b-D-gentiobioside in brain tissues CRMP2 in the hippocampus alleviates chronic stress-induced depressive-like behaviours in mice by affecting synaptic function Unlocking the therapeutic promise of miRNAs in promoting amyloid-β clearance for Alzheimer's disease The study on effects of acute exposure to high altitude hypoxia on cognitive function in lowlander
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1