Non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus non-invasive intermittent mandatory ventilation as a rescue mode in preterm infants with respiratory distress on nasal CPAP-a randomized control trial.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS European Journal of Pediatrics Pub Date : 2025-02-22 DOI:10.1007/s00431-025-06041-8
R D Rachana, Tejopratap Oleti, D Saikiran, Venkateshwarlu Vardhelli, Sruthi Thiruveedi, Altaf Hussain, Prasen Reddy Tamatam
{"title":"Non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus non-invasive intermittent mandatory ventilation as a rescue mode in preterm infants with respiratory distress on nasal CPAP-a randomized control trial.","authors":"R D Rachana, Tejopratap Oleti, D Saikiran, Venkateshwarlu Vardhelli, Sruthi Thiruveedi, Altaf Hussain, Prasen Reddy Tamatam","doi":"10.1007/s00431-025-06041-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To compare NHFOV in decreasing the need for mechanical ventilation in the first 7 days of randomization in preterm infants born before 34 weeks of gestational age having nCPAP failure when used as rescue mode compared to NIMV. All eligible neonates were randomized and allocated to either NHFOV or NIMV group after taking the consent from the parents. Standardized protocol was followed on initiation, titration, weaning, and optimization of all the respiratory supports. In this study, a total of 45 neonates were eligible; among them, 20 neonates were randomized to NIMV group and 20 neonates to NHFOV group remaining 5 infants were missed due to the non-availability of a machine (n = 4) and missed randomization (n = 1). The primary outcome was need for mechanical ventilation within first 7 days of randomization in NIMV and NHFOV group was 45% and 40% (p = 0.85, OR = 1.22 (CI 0.35-4.3)). The secondary outcome was a duration of ventilation within 72 h of randomization was 40% vs. 31.6% in NIMV and NHFOV group (p = 0.58). Bronchopulmonary dysplasia was 5% and 10% in NIMV and NHFOV group with p = 0.548, OR = 0.47 (CI 0.39-5.6), and mortality was one infant in NIMV and 3 infants in NHFOV group (p = 0.568, OR = 0.29 (CI 0.02-3.1)).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NIMV and NHFOV are comparable in reducing the rates of mechanical ventilation within 72 h and within 7 days of post-randomization. Multi-centric trials with large sample sizes are required to prove the hypothesis.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>www.ctri.nic.in id CTRI/2021/10/037681, registered on October 29, 2021.</p><p><strong>What is known: </strong>• NIMV or nHFOV being used as primary as well as post extubation respiratory support in neonates. • NIMV and nHFOV has shown better clinical outcomes than nCPAP when used as primary and post extubation respiratory support.</p><p><strong>What is new: </strong>• NIMV and nHFOV can be used as rescue mode after CPAP failure to prevent need for mechanical ventilation. • nHFOV appears promising as rescue mode in neonates who meets CPAP failure criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":11997,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pediatrics","volume":"184 3","pages":"205"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-025-06041-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To compare NHFOV in decreasing the need for mechanical ventilation in the first 7 days of randomization in preterm infants born before 34 weeks of gestational age having nCPAP failure when used as rescue mode compared to NIMV. All eligible neonates were randomized and allocated to either NHFOV or NIMV group after taking the consent from the parents. Standardized protocol was followed on initiation, titration, weaning, and optimization of all the respiratory supports. In this study, a total of 45 neonates were eligible; among them, 20 neonates were randomized to NIMV group and 20 neonates to NHFOV group remaining 5 infants were missed due to the non-availability of a machine (n = 4) and missed randomization (n = 1). The primary outcome was need for mechanical ventilation within first 7 days of randomization in NIMV and NHFOV group was 45% and 40% (p = 0.85, OR = 1.22 (CI 0.35-4.3)). The secondary outcome was a duration of ventilation within 72 h of randomization was 40% vs. 31.6% in NIMV and NHFOV group (p = 0.58). Bronchopulmonary dysplasia was 5% and 10% in NIMV and NHFOV group with p = 0.548, OR = 0.47 (CI 0.39-5.6), and mortality was one infant in NIMV and 3 infants in NHFOV group (p = 0.568, OR = 0.29 (CI 0.02-3.1)).

Conclusion: NIMV and NHFOV are comparable in reducing the rates of mechanical ventilation within 72 h and within 7 days of post-randomization. Multi-centric trials with large sample sizes are required to prove the hypothesis.

Trial registration: www.ctri.nic.in id CTRI/2021/10/037681, registered on October 29, 2021.

What is known: • NIMV or nHFOV being used as primary as well as post extubation respiratory support in neonates. • NIMV and nHFOV has shown better clinical outcomes than nCPAP when used as primary and post extubation respiratory support.

What is new: • NIMV and nHFOV can be used as rescue mode after CPAP failure to prevent need for mechanical ventilation. • nHFOV appears promising as rescue mode in neonates who meets CPAP failure criteria.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
367
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Pediatrics (EJPE) is a leading peer-reviewed medical journal which covers the entire field of pediatrics. The editors encourage authors to submit original articles, reviews, short communications, and correspondence on all relevant themes and topics. EJPE is particularly committed to the publication of articles on important new clinical research that will have an immediate impact on clinical pediatric practice. The editorial office very much welcomes ideas for publications, whether individual articles or article series, that fit this goal and is always willing to address inquiries from authors regarding potential submissions. Invited review articles on clinical pediatrics that provide comprehensive coverage of a subject of importance are also regularly commissioned. The short publication time reflects both the commitment of the editors and publishers and their passion for new developments in the field of pediatrics. EJPE is active on social media (@EurJPediatrics) and we invite you to participate. EJPE is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics (EAP) and publishes guidelines and statements in cooperation with the EAP.
期刊最新文献
Phenotypic variability in cases with CACNA1A mutation. Time to remission in childhood steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome: a change in perspective. Enhancing neonatal resuscitation outcomes: bridging theory and practice. The impact of BMI on disease activity and growth outcomes in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. The MNK-SYNGAP1 axis in specific learning disorder: gene expression pattern and new perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1