Responding to old problems in the Dutch work addiction scale: a psychometric approach in a Peruvian sample.

IF 3 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY BMC Psychology Pub Date : 2025-02-22 DOI:10.1186/s40359-025-02437-1
Edwin Salas-Blas, Miguel Vallejos-Flores, Gustavo Calderón-De la Cruz, Eduardo Manzanares-Medina, Eduardo Fonseca-Pedrero, Nikol Mayo-Puchoc, Anthony Copez-Lonzoy
{"title":"Responding to old problems in the Dutch work addiction scale: a psychometric approach in a Peruvian sample.","authors":"Edwin Salas-Blas, Miguel Vallejos-Flores, Gustavo Calderón-De la Cruz, Eduardo Manzanares-Medina, Eduardo Fonseca-Pedrero, Nikol Mayo-Puchoc, Anthony Copez-Lonzoy","doi":"10.1186/s40359-025-02437-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Harmful work patterns have become a public health problem. These conditions are worrying since they can have an impact on mental health, social conflicts, and physical difficulties due to their normalization of pathological behaviors related to work addiction.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>(1) determine the psychometric properties and reliability of the DUWAS and (2) evaluate valid comparisons at the construct level.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Spanish version of DUWAS was used. For the evaluation of the psychometric model, 446 Peruvian workers responded to the Spanish version (60.5% women aged 18 to 65, M = 35.1 SD = 12.45).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The unidimensional version was confirmed (x<sup>2</sup> = 67.495<sub>(14)</sub>; CFI = 0.96; TLI = 0.95; SRMR = 0.050 and RMSEA = 0.069). The reliability was acceptable (α = 0.735; 95% CI: 0.706 - 0.762; ω = 0.741; 95% CI: 0.712 - 0.767) and measurement invariance was confirmed for sex and age groups. Concurrent validity was mostly identified with mental health indicators.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides new information on dimensionality and the realization of valid comparisons that allow its use in Spanish-speaking workers.</p>","PeriodicalId":37867,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychology","volume":"13 1","pages":"155"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11847342/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02437-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Harmful work patterns have become a public health problem. These conditions are worrying since they can have an impact on mental health, social conflicts, and physical difficulties due to their normalization of pathological behaviors related to work addiction.

Aims: (1) determine the psychometric properties and reliability of the DUWAS and (2) evaluate valid comparisons at the construct level.

Methods: The Spanish version of DUWAS was used. For the evaluation of the psychometric model, 446 Peruvian workers responded to the Spanish version (60.5% women aged 18 to 65, M = 35.1 SD = 12.45).

Results: The unidimensional version was confirmed (x2 = 67.495(14); CFI = 0.96; TLI = 0.95; SRMR = 0.050 and RMSEA = 0.069). The reliability was acceptable (α = 0.735; 95% CI: 0.706 - 0.762; ω = 0.741; 95% CI: 0.712 - 0.767) and measurement invariance was confirmed for sex and age groups. Concurrent validity was mostly identified with mental health indicators.

Conclusion: This study provides new information on dimensionality and the realization of valid comparisons that allow its use in Spanish-speaking workers.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
回应荷兰工作成瘾量表中的老问题:秘鲁样本的心理测量方法。
背景:有害的工作方式已经成为一个公共卫生问题。这些情况令人担忧,因为他们可能会对精神健康产生影响,社会冲突,以及由于与工作成瘾相关的病理行为正常化而导致的身体困难。目的:(1)确定DUWAS的心理测量特性和信度;(2)评估构念水平上的有效比较。方法:采用西班牙语版DUWAS。对于心理测量模型的评估,446名秘鲁工人回应了西班牙语版本(60.5%的女性年龄在18至65岁,M = 35.1 SD = 12.45)。结果:单元化版本得到确认(x2 = 67.495(14);cfi = 0.96;tli = 0.95;SRMR = 0.050, RMSEA = 0.069)。信度可接受(α = 0.735;95% ci: 0.706 - 0.762;ω = 0.741;95% CI: 0.712 - 0.767),性别和年龄组的测量不变性得到证实。同时效度主要与心理健康指标一致。结论:本研究提供了关于维度的新信息,并实现了有效的比较,允许其在讲西班牙语的工人中使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Psychology
BMC Psychology Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
265
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of psychology, human behavior and the mind, including developmental, clinical, cognitive, experimental, health and social psychology, as well as personality and individual differences. The journal welcomes quantitative and qualitative research methods, including animal studies.
期刊最新文献
Immersive virtual reality for reducing public speaking anxiety in students accessing a university psychological counseling service: protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Encouraging positive psychology among adults with physical disabilities through caregiver collaboration: a community-based quasi-experimental study. The influence of information similarity overload on users' withdrawal behaviour from social communities on SNSs. The relationship between exercise atmosphere and college students' exercise behavior: the mediating role of subjective exercise experience and network analysis. Demystifying the impact of digital hindrance stressors on employee digital creativity: interactive roles of job anxiety and positive stress mindset.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1