Perioperative assessment and management of frailty in elderly patients: a national survey of Italian anesthesiologists.

Massimiliano Greco, Ersilia Luca, Fernando Chiumiento, Astrid U Behr, Gabriella Bettelli, Elena Bignami, Massimo Antonelli, Maurizio Cecconi, Paola Aceto
{"title":"Perioperative assessment and management of frailty in elderly patients: a national survey of Italian anesthesiologists.","authors":"Massimiliano Greco, Ersilia Luca, Fernando Chiumiento, Astrid U Behr, Gabriella Bettelli, Elena Bignami, Massimo Antonelli, Maurizio Cecconi, Paola Aceto","doi":"10.1186/s44158-025-00231-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prevalence of frailty is increasing as the global population continues to age. Frailty is associated with poor perioperative outcomes including increased morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study is to examine current practices and perspectives of anesthesiogists in Italy on the provision of care for elderly surgical patients with frailty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a national survey. Data were collected via an online questionnaire distributed by the Italian Society of Anaesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care (SIAARTI). Responses were collected over 24 weeks between October 2022 and March 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven-hundred thirteen anesthetists completed the survey. A total of 39.8% (277) of respondents were working in university hospitals. Frailty scoring was routinely performed in 51.8% of care settings. Only 26.3% of organizations surveyed had a dedicated pathway for perioperative management of frail elderly patients. The most common method for frailty assessment was the subjective assessment by the anesthesiologist (58.3%). More than half of the participants reported the use of ERAS items in most cases. Almost half of respondents reported the use of postoperative screening tools for delirium (45% of respondents).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>While these results point to the resistance to clinical implementation of frailty assessment, they also highlight the perceived need for careful management. This can help in identifying elderly patients who may require targeted perioperative management and in ensuring the preservation of cognitive and functional status.</p>","PeriodicalId":73597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","volume":"5 1","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11846183/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-025-00231-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of frailty is increasing as the global population continues to age. Frailty is associated with poor perioperative outcomes including increased morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study is to examine current practices and perspectives of anesthesiogists in Italy on the provision of care for elderly surgical patients with frailty.

Methods: We conducted a national survey. Data were collected via an online questionnaire distributed by the Italian Society of Anaesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care (SIAARTI). Responses were collected over 24 weeks between October 2022 and March 2023.

Results: Seven-hundred thirteen anesthetists completed the survey. A total of 39.8% (277) of respondents were working in university hospitals. Frailty scoring was routinely performed in 51.8% of care settings. Only 26.3% of organizations surveyed had a dedicated pathway for perioperative management of frail elderly patients. The most common method for frailty assessment was the subjective assessment by the anesthesiologist (58.3%). More than half of the participants reported the use of ERAS items in most cases. Almost half of respondents reported the use of postoperative screening tools for delirium (45% of respondents).

Discussion: While these results point to the resistance to clinical implementation of frailty assessment, they also highlight the perceived need for careful management. This can help in identifying elderly patients who may require targeted perioperative management and in ensuring the preservation of cognitive and functional status.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年患者衰弱的围手术期评估和管理:意大利麻醉师的全国调查。
背景:随着全球人口持续老龄化,虚弱的患病率正在增加。虚弱与围手术期预后不良相关,包括发病率和死亡率增加。本研究的目的是检查目前的做法和麻醉师的观点在意大利提供护理老年外科病人虚弱。方法:在全国范围内进行调查。数据通过意大利麻醉、镇痛、复苏和重症监护学会(SIAARTI)分发的在线问卷收集。在2022年10月至2023年3月的24周内收集了反馈。结果:共713名麻醉师完成调查。39.8%(277人)在高校医院工作。51.8%的护理机构例行进行虚弱评分。仅有26.3%的受访机构有专门的老年体弱患者围手术期管理路径。最常见的衰弱评估方法是麻醉医师的主观评估(58.3%)。在大多数情况下,超过一半的参与者报告使用了电子纪元物品。几乎一半的受访者报告使用了术后谵妄筛查工具(45%的受访者)。讨论:虽然这些结果指出了临床实施虚弱评估的阻力,但它们也强调了谨慎管理的感知需求。这有助于识别可能需要有针对性的围手术期管理的老年患者,并确保保留认知和功能状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Letter to Editor: real-world use of cannabis oil for pain management in fibromyalgia. Non-invasive ICP monitoring when invasive systems are available in the care of acute brain injured patients: a clinical approach. Proportional assist ventilation versus pressure support ventilation for weaning from mechanical ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Global incidence of acute kidney injury and renal replacement therapy among obstetric intensive care unit admissions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Incidence of hemi-diaphragmatic paresis with different volumes of local anaesthetics in interscalene brachial plexus block.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1