Language measures correlate with other measures used to study emotion.

Shaina Munin, Desmond C Ong, Sydney Okland, Gili Freedman, Jennifer S Beer
{"title":"Language measures correlate with other measures used to study emotion.","authors":"Shaina Munin, Desmond C Ong, Sydney Okland, Gili Freedman, Jennifer S Beer","doi":"10.1038/s44271-025-00212-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Researchers are increasingly using language measures to study emotion, yet less is known about whether language relates to other measures often used to study emotion. Building on previous work which focuses on associations between language and self-report, we test associations between language and a broader range of measures (self-report, observer report, facial cues, vocal cues). Furthermore, we examine associations across different dictionaries (LIWC-22, NRC, Lexical Suite, ANEW, VADER) used to estimate valence (i.e., positive versus negative emotion) or discrete emotions (i.e., anger, fear, sadness) in language. Associations were tested in three large, multimodal datasets (Ns = 193-1856; average word count = 316.7-2782.8). Language consistently related to observer report and consistently related to self-report in two of the three datasets. Statistically significant associations between language and facial cues emerged for language measures of valence but not for language measures of discrete emotions. Language did not consistently show significant associations with vocal cues. Results did not tend to significantly vary across dictionaries. The current research suggests that language measures (in particular, language measures of valence) are correlated with a range of other measures used to study emotion. Therefore, researchers may wish to use language to study emotion when other measures are unavailable or impractical for their research question.</p>","PeriodicalId":501698,"journal":{"name":"Communications Psychology","volume":"3 1","pages":"29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11847001/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-025-00212-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Researchers are increasingly using language measures to study emotion, yet less is known about whether language relates to other measures often used to study emotion. Building on previous work which focuses on associations between language and self-report, we test associations between language and a broader range of measures (self-report, observer report, facial cues, vocal cues). Furthermore, we examine associations across different dictionaries (LIWC-22, NRC, Lexical Suite, ANEW, VADER) used to estimate valence (i.e., positive versus negative emotion) or discrete emotions (i.e., anger, fear, sadness) in language. Associations were tested in three large, multimodal datasets (Ns = 193-1856; average word count = 316.7-2782.8). Language consistently related to observer report and consistently related to self-report in two of the three datasets. Statistically significant associations between language and facial cues emerged for language measures of valence but not for language measures of discrete emotions. Language did not consistently show significant associations with vocal cues. Results did not tend to significantly vary across dictionaries. The current research suggests that language measures (in particular, language measures of valence) are correlated with a range of other measures used to study emotion. Therefore, researchers may wish to use language to study emotion when other measures are unavailable or impractical for their research question.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
语言测试与用于研究情感的其他测试相关。
研究人员越来越多地使用语言测量来研究情感,但对于语言是否与通常用于研究情感的其他测量相关,人们知之甚少。在先前研究语言和自我报告之间关联的基础上,我们测试了语言和更广泛的测量(自我报告、观察者报告、面部线索、声音线索)之间的关联。此外,我们研究了不同词典(LIWC-22, NRC, Lexical Suite, new, VADER)之间的关联,这些词典用于估计语言中的效价(即积极情绪与消极情绪)或离散情绪(即愤怒,恐惧,悲伤)。在三个大型多模态数据集中检验相关性(Ns = 193-1856;平均字数= 316.7-2782.8)。在三个数据集中的两个中,语言始终与观察者报告和自我报告相关。语言和面部线索在效价的语言测量中有统计学意义的关联,但在离散情绪的语言测量中没有。语言并不总是显示出与声音线索的显著联系。不同词典的结果并没有显著差异。目前的研究表明,语言测量(特别是效价的语言测量)与一系列用于研究情感的其他测量相关联。因此,研究人员可能希望使用语言来研究情绪时,其他措施不可用或不切实际的研究问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Increased generalisation in trait anxiety is driven by aversive value transfer. A global Youth Peacebuilding Beliefs Scale. Rethinking misinformation through plausibility estimation and confidence calibration. Language-based assessments can predict psychological and subjective well-being. Impaired slow-wave sleep accounts for brain aging-related increases in anxiety.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1