Writing method sections in qualitative accounting research: Engaging with landmark citations through ‘instructively selective elaboration’

Christopher S. Chapman, Di Wang
{"title":"Writing method sections in qualitative accounting research: Engaging with landmark citations through ‘instructively selective elaboration’","authors":"Christopher S. Chapman, Di Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.bar.2025.101591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Writing method sections for qualitative studies in accounting is challenging, partly due to the diverse methodological bases upon which different researchers can draw, partly because of the nature of collecting and analysing qualitative data which is semi-structured at best. Given the space constraints increasingly facing journal articles, this requires a delicate balance between succinct mobilisation of general principles, discussion of how these relate to the situational specifics of field setting, research question and the many skilful practices that make up individual field studies. This is particularly challenging for emerging qualitative scholars who have little direct experience to draw on in striking such a balance. To support them in this challenge we propose the benefits of “instructively selective elaboration” as an approach to writing method sections. We argue that such an approach has the potential to earn a sense of trustworthiness of individual studies, but further to also contribute to field level discussions about situationally and methodologically appropriate choices in qualitative accounting research.","PeriodicalId":501001,"journal":{"name":"The British Accounting Review","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British Accounting Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2025.101591","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Writing method sections for qualitative studies in accounting is challenging, partly due to the diverse methodological bases upon which different researchers can draw, partly because of the nature of collecting and analysing qualitative data which is semi-structured at best. Given the space constraints increasingly facing journal articles, this requires a delicate balance between succinct mobilisation of general principles, discussion of how these relate to the situational specifics of field setting, research question and the many skilful practices that make up individual field studies. This is particularly challenging for emerging qualitative scholars who have little direct experience to draw on in striking such a balance. To support them in this challenge we propose the benefits of “instructively selective elaboration” as an approach to writing method sections. We argue that such an approach has the potential to earn a sense of trustworthiness of individual studies, but further to also contribute to field level discussions about situationally and methodologically appropriate choices in qualitative accounting research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unsung guardians? Communal fraud susceptibility and complaints following mass financial adviser attrition Do green assets enhance portfolio optimization? A multi-horizon investing perspective The decentralization enigma in DeFi: Impact of U.S. federal funds rate changes Managing the shift from voluntary to mandatory climate disclosure: The role of carbon accounting Writing method sections in qualitative accounting research: Engaging with landmark citations through ‘instructively selective elaboration’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1