Characteristics and outcomes of hospitalized patients with Isolated and systemic cardiac sarcoidosis: Analysis of the Nationwide readmissions database 2016–2021

IF 2.5 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS IJC Heart and Vasculature Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-24 DOI:10.1016/j.ijcha.2025.101636
Raheel Ahmed , Nitish Behary Paray , Hiroyuki Sawatari , Syed Emir Irfan Wafa , Kamleshun Ramphul , Mushood Ahmed , Hritvik Jain , Saurabh Deshpande , Mohammed Khanji , Athol Umfrey Wells , Peter Collins , Selma Mohammed , Omar Abou-Ezzeddine , Vasilis Kouranos , Rakesh Sharma , Anwar Chahal
{"title":"Characteristics and outcomes of hospitalized patients with Isolated and systemic cardiac sarcoidosis: Analysis of the Nationwide readmissions database 2016–2021","authors":"Raheel Ahmed ,&nbsp;Nitish Behary Paray ,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Sawatari ,&nbsp;Syed Emir Irfan Wafa ,&nbsp;Kamleshun Ramphul ,&nbsp;Mushood Ahmed ,&nbsp;Hritvik Jain ,&nbsp;Saurabh Deshpande ,&nbsp;Mohammed Khanji ,&nbsp;Athol Umfrey Wells ,&nbsp;Peter Collins ,&nbsp;Selma Mohammed ,&nbsp;Omar Abou-Ezzeddine ,&nbsp;Vasilis Kouranos ,&nbsp;Rakesh Sharma ,&nbsp;Anwar Chahal","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcha.2025.101636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To identify any differences in the characteristics and outcomes of patients with Isolated cardiac sarcoidosis (iCS) vs systemic cardiac sarcoidosis (sCS).</div></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><div>All inpatient encounters in the Nationwide Readmission Database from 2016 to 2021 were analyzed for the rates, predictors, costs and mortality during index and unplanned 90-days readmissions for iCS and sCS patients. Patients with ischemic heart disease were excluded.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>1,667 patients were identified (57.8 % male), of which, 1,013 (60.8 %) had iCS and 654 (39.2 %) had sCS. The median (IQR) age of iCS patients was slightly older [57.0 (49.0–66.0) vs 56.0 (48.0–64.0), p = 0.04]. On index admission, iCS patients had higher prevalence of ventricular tachycardia (36.9 % vs 28.8 %, p = 0.001) and catheter ablation (5.6 % vs 2.8 %, p = 0.006). The predictors for all-cause readmissions were Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (HR 1.19, 95 % CI 1.01–1.40, p = 0.04), age (HR 0.98 (0.97–1.00), p = 0.01) and the use of anticoagulant therapy (HR 1.92, 95 % CI 1.35–2.72, p &lt; 0.001). Patients with sCS were more likely to be readmitted with heart failure compared to iCS patients (SHR 3.78, 95 % CI 1.11–12.94, p = 0.03). During subsequent readmission, iCS and sCS patients had comparable rates of in-hospital mortality, median length of stay and healthcare-associated costs. No independent predictors of in-hospital mortality at readmission were ascertained.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Isolated CS patients, when compared to systemic CS, had a greater prevalence of ventricular tachycardia and catheter ablation. They were less likely to be re-hospitalized with heart failure within 90-days. Age, higher CCI, and use of anticoagulant therapy were predictors for all-cause readmissions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38026,"journal":{"name":"IJC Heart and Vasculature","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 101636"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJC Heart and Vasculature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352906725000399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To identify any differences in the characteristics and outcomes of patients with Isolated cardiac sarcoidosis (iCS) vs systemic cardiac sarcoidosis (sCS).

Patients and methods

All inpatient encounters in the Nationwide Readmission Database from 2016 to 2021 were analyzed for the rates, predictors, costs and mortality during index and unplanned 90-days readmissions for iCS and sCS patients. Patients with ischemic heart disease were excluded.

Results

1,667 patients were identified (57.8 % male), of which, 1,013 (60.8 %) had iCS and 654 (39.2 %) had sCS. The median (IQR) age of iCS patients was slightly older [57.0 (49.0–66.0) vs 56.0 (48.0–64.0), p = 0.04]. On index admission, iCS patients had higher prevalence of ventricular tachycardia (36.9 % vs 28.8 %, p = 0.001) and catheter ablation (5.6 % vs 2.8 %, p = 0.006). The predictors for all-cause readmissions were Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (HR 1.19, 95 % CI 1.01–1.40, p = 0.04), age (HR 0.98 (0.97–1.00), p = 0.01) and the use of anticoagulant therapy (HR 1.92, 95 % CI 1.35–2.72, p < 0.001). Patients with sCS were more likely to be readmitted with heart failure compared to iCS patients (SHR 3.78, 95 % CI 1.11–12.94, p = 0.03). During subsequent readmission, iCS and sCS patients had comparable rates of in-hospital mortality, median length of stay and healthcare-associated costs. No independent predictors of in-hospital mortality at readmission were ascertained.

Conclusions

Isolated CS patients, when compared to systemic CS, had a greater prevalence of ventricular tachycardia and catheter ablation. They were less likely to be re-hospitalized with heart failure within 90-days. Age, higher CCI, and use of anticoagulant therapy were predictors for all-cause readmissions.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
孤立性和全身性心脏结节病住院患者的特征和结局:2016-2021年全国再入院数据库分析
目的探讨孤立性心脏结节病(iCS)患者与全身性心脏结节病(sCS)患者在特征和预后方面的差异。患者和方法分析2016年至2021年全国再入院数据库中所有住院患者的再入院率、预测因素、成本和死亡率,分析iCS和sCS患者在指数和非计划90天再入院期间的再入院率、预测因素、成本和死亡率。排除缺血性心脏病患者。结果共发现1667例患者(男性占57.8%),其中1013例(60.8%)有ic, 654例(39.2%)有sCS。ic患者的中位(IQR)年龄略大[57.0 (49.0 ~ 66.0)vs 56.0 (48.0 ~ 64.0), p = 0.04]。入院时,ic患者室性心动过速(36.9% vs 28.8%, p = 0.001)和导管消融(5.6% vs 2.8%, p = 0.006)的患病率较高。全因再入院的预测因子为Charlson共病指数(CCI) (HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.01 ~ 1.40, p = 0.04)、年龄(HR 0.98 (0.97 ~ 1.00), p = 0.01)和抗凝治疗的使用(HR 1.92, 95% CI 1.35 ~ 2.72, p <;0.001)。与ic患者相比,sc患者更容易因心力衰竭再次入院(SHR为3.78,95% CI为1.11-12.94,p = 0.03)。在随后的再入院期间,ic和sCS患者的住院死亡率、中位住院时间和医疗保健相关费用相当。没有确定再入院时住院死亡率的独立预测因素。结论:与全身性CS相比,孤立性CS患者室性心动过速和导管消融的发生率更高。他们在90天内因心力衰竭再次住院的可能性较小。年龄、较高的CCI和使用抗凝治疗是全因再入院的预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IJC Heart and Vasculature
IJC Heart and Vasculature Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
10.30%
发文量
216
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: IJC Heart & Vasculature is an online-only, open-access journal dedicated to publishing original articles and reviews (also Editorials and Letters to the Editor) which report on structural and functional cardiovascular pathology, with an emphasis on imaging and disease pathophysiology. Articles must be authentic, educational, clinically relevant, and original in their content and scientific approach. IJC Heart & Vasculature requires the highest standards of scientific integrity in order to promote reliable, reproducible and verifiable research findings. All authors are advised to consult the Principles of Ethical Publishing in the International Journal of Cardiology before submitting a manuscript. Submission of a manuscript to this journal gives the publisher the right to publish that paper if it is accepted. Manuscripts may be edited to improve clarity and expression.
期刊最新文献
Big Endothelin-1 Predicts the long-term survival in patients undergoing septal myectomy Differential effects of non-selective and cardio-selective beta-blocker therapy on ECG parameters in long QT syndrome type 1 Low-dose ventricular radiotherapy in wild-type transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis: a prospective, first-in-human, exploratory clinical trial ‘A leukin to the future’: is low serum interleukin-2 (IL-2) a predictive biomarker for postoperative atrial fibrillation? Determinants of cancer mortality in patients after acute myocardial infarction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1