Characteristics and outcomes of hospitalized patients with Isolated and systemic cardiac sarcoidosis: Analysis of the Nationwide readmissions database 2016–2021
{"title":"Characteristics and outcomes of hospitalized patients with Isolated and systemic cardiac sarcoidosis: Analysis of the Nationwide readmissions database 2016–2021","authors":"Raheel Ahmed , Nitish Behary Paray , Hiroyuki Sawatari , Syed Emir Irfan Wafa , Kamleshun Ramphul , Mushood Ahmed , Hritvik Jain , Saurabh Deshpande , Mohammed Khanji , Athol Umfrey Wells , Peter Collins , Selma Mohammed , Omar Abou-Ezzeddine , Vasilis Kouranos , Rakesh Sharma , Anwar Chahal","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcha.2025.101636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To identify any differences in the characteristics and outcomes of patients with Isolated cardiac sarcoidosis (iCS) vs systemic cardiac sarcoidosis (sCS).</div></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><div>All inpatient encounters in the Nationwide Readmission Database from 2016 to 2021 were analyzed for the rates, predictors, costs and mortality during index and unplanned 90-days readmissions for iCS and sCS patients. Patients with ischemic heart disease were excluded.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>1,667 patients were identified (57.8 % male), of which, 1,013 (60.8 %) had iCS and 654 (39.2 %) had sCS. The median (IQR) age of iCS patients was slightly older [57.0 (49.0–66.0) vs 56.0 (48.0–64.0), p = 0.04]. On index admission, iCS patients had higher prevalence of ventricular tachycardia (36.9 % vs 28.8 %, p = 0.001) and catheter ablation (5.6 % vs 2.8 %, p = 0.006). The predictors for all-cause readmissions were Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (HR 1.19, 95 % CI 1.01–1.40, p = 0.04), age (HR 0.98 (0.97–1.00), p = 0.01) and the use of anticoagulant therapy (HR 1.92, 95 % CI 1.35–2.72, p < 0.001). Patients with sCS were more likely to be readmitted with heart failure compared to iCS patients (SHR 3.78, 95 % CI 1.11–12.94, p = 0.03). During subsequent readmission, iCS and sCS patients had comparable rates of in-hospital mortality, median length of stay and healthcare-associated costs. No independent predictors of in-hospital mortality at readmission were ascertained.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Isolated CS patients, when compared to systemic CS, had a greater prevalence of ventricular tachycardia and catheter ablation. They were less likely to be re-hospitalized with heart failure within 90-days. Age, higher CCI, and use of anticoagulant therapy were predictors for all-cause readmissions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38026,"journal":{"name":"IJC Heart and Vasculature","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 101636"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJC Heart and Vasculature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352906725000399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To identify any differences in the characteristics and outcomes of patients with Isolated cardiac sarcoidosis (iCS) vs systemic cardiac sarcoidosis (sCS).
Patients and methods
All inpatient encounters in the Nationwide Readmission Database from 2016 to 2021 were analyzed for the rates, predictors, costs and mortality during index and unplanned 90-days readmissions for iCS and sCS patients. Patients with ischemic heart disease were excluded.
Results
1,667 patients were identified (57.8 % male), of which, 1,013 (60.8 %) had iCS and 654 (39.2 %) had sCS. The median (IQR) age of iCS patients was slightly older [57.0 (49.0–66.0) vs 56.0 (48.0–64.0), p = 0.04]. On index admission, iCS patients had higher prevalence of ventricular tachycardia (36.9 % vs 28.8 %, p = 0.001) and catheter ablation (5.6 % vs 2.8 %, p = 0.006). The predictors for all-cause readmissions were Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (HR 1.19, 95 % CI 1.01–1.40, p = 0.04), age (HR 0.98 (0.97–1.00), p = 0.01) and the use of anticoagulant therapy (HR 1.92, 95 % CI 1.35–2.72, p < 0.001). Patients with sCS were more likely to be readmitted with heart failure compared to iCS patients (SHR 3.78, 95 % CI 1.11–12.94, p = 0.03). During subsequent readmission, iCS and sCS patients had comparable rates of in-hospital mortality, median length of stay and healthcare-associated costs. No independent predictors of in-hospital mortality at readmission were ascertained.
Conclusions
Isolated CS patients, when compared to systemic CS, had a greater prevalence of ventricular tachycardia and catheter ablation. They were less likely to be re-hospitalized with heart failure within 90-days. Age, higher CCI, and use of anticoagulant therapy were predictors for all-cause readmissions.
目的探讨孤立性心脏结节病(iCS)患者与全身性心脏结节病(sCS)患者在特征和预后方面的差异。患者和方法分析2016年至2021年全国再入院数据库中所有住院患者的再入院率、预测因素、成本和死亡率,分析iCS和sCS患者在指数和非计划90天再入院期间的再入院率、预测因素、成本和死亡率。排除缺血性心脏病患者。结果共发现1667例患者(男性占57.8%),其中1013例(60.8%)有ic, 654例(39.2%)有sCS。ic患者的中位(IQR)年龄略大[57.0 (49.0 ~ 66.0)vs 56.0 (48.0 ~ 64.0), p = 0.04]。入院时,ic患者室性心动过速(36.9% vs 28.8%, p = 0.001)和导管消融(5.6% vs 2.8%, p = 0.006)的患病率较高。全因再入院的预测因子为Charlson共病指数(CCI) (HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.01 ~ 1.40, p = 0.04)、年龄(HR 0.98 (0.97 ~ 1.00), p = 0.01)和抗凝治疗的使用(HR 1.92, 95% CI 1.35 ~ 2.72, p <;0.001)。与ic患者相比,sc患者更容易因心力衰竭再次入院(SHR为3.78,95% CI为1.11-12.94,p = 0.03)。在随后的再入院期间,ic和sCS患者的住院死亡率、中位住院时间和医疗保健相关费用相当。没有确定再入院时住院死亡率的独立预测因素。结论:与全身性CS相比,孤立性CS患者室性心动过速和导管消融的发生率更高。他们在90天内因心力衰竭再次住院的可能性较小。年龄、较高的CCI和使用抗凝治疗是全因再入院的预测因素。
期刊介绍:
IJC Heart & Vasculature is an online-only, open-access journal dedicated to publishing original articles and reviews (also Editorials and Letters to the Editor) which report on structural and functional cardiovascular pathology, with an emphasis on imaging and disease pathophysiology. Articles must be authentic, educational, clinically relevant, and original in their content and scientific approach. IJC Heart & Vasculature requires the highest standards of scientific integrity in order to promote reliable, reproducible and verifiable research findings. All authors are advised to consult the Principles of Ethical Publishing in the International Journal of Cardiology before submitting a manuscript. Submission of a manuscript to this journal gives the publisher the right to publish that paper if it is accepted. Manuscripts may be edited to improve clarity and expression.