Optimal ecological restoration strategy development based on value-cost trade-offs

IF 3.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Global Ecology and Conservation Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03500
Yunxuan Liu , Cui Zhang , Miaomiao Xie , Jingyi Xie
{"title":"Optimal ecological restoration strategy development based on value-cost trade-offs","authors":"Yunxuan Liu ,&nbsp;Cui Zhang ,&nbsp;Miaomiao Xie ,&nbsp;Jingyi Xie","doi":"10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ecological restoration can provide a holistic and systemic perspective for the implementation of ecosystem protection and restoration projects. However, making decisions on optimal ecological restoration strategies remains a challenge. This study supports strategy development by balancing ecological improvement and economic viability. In this study, we took Huanghua, a county under provincial jurisdiction in China, as an example. We identified areas prioritized for ecological restoration by employing the research paradigm of \"sources-resistance surface-corridors-nodes\". In addition, we searched for Pareto-optimal solutions using the nondominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II) to balance the trade-offs between different objectives. The results of this study revealed that 46 ecological barriers were identified as priority ecological restoration areas in Huanghua, mainly for cropland and construction land. Three optimal ecological restoration strategies with high value<img>cost ratio, high ecological value, and low implementation cost were proposed for typical ecological restoration priority areas for different decision-making needs. Area I has the highest value<img>cost ratio, whereas Area II and Area III have the same value<img>cost ratio, and it is most appropriate to prioritize restoration for Area I. When the investment budget is lower than the implementation cost of ecological restoration, ecological restoration projects with a high value<img>cost ratio are often chosen. This study constructed a methodological framework for formulating optimal ecological restoration strategies, which effectively enhanced the science of the decision-making process. The results provide a highly valuable scientific basis for developing ecological restoration strategies in Huanghua.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54264,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Conservation","volume":"58 ","pages":"Article e03500"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989425001015","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ecological restoration can provide a holistic and systemic perspective for the implementation of ecosystem protection and restoration projects. However, making decisions on optimal ecological restoration strategies remains a challenge. This study supports strategy development by balancing ecological improvement and economic viability. In this study, we took Huanghua, a county under provincial jurisdiction in China, as an example. We identified areas prioritized for ecological restoration by employing the research paradigm of "sources-resistance surface-corridors-nodes". In addition, we searched for Pareto-optimal solutions using the nondominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II) to balance the trade-offs between different objectives. The results of this study revealed that 46 ecological barriers were identified as priority ecological restoration areas in Huanghua, mainly for cropland and construction land. Three optimal ecological restoration strategies with high valuecost ratio, high ecological value, and low implementation cost were proposed for typical ecological restoration priority areas for different decision-making needs. Area I has the highest valuecost ratio, whereas Area II and Area III have the same valuecost ratio, and it is most appropriate to prioritize restoration for Area I. When the investment budget is lower than the implementation cost of ecological restoration, ecological restoration projects with a high valuecost ratio are often chosen. This study constructed a methodological framework for formulating optimal ecological restoration strategies, which effectively enhanced the science of the decision-making process. The results provide a highly valuable scientific basis for developing ecological restoration strategies in Huanghua.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于价值-成本权衡的最优生态恢复策略制定
生态修复可以为生态系统保护与修复工程的实施提供整体性和系统性的视角。然而,选择最优的生态恢复策略仍然是一个挑战。该研究通过平衡生态改善和经济可行性来支持战略制定。在本研究中,我们以中国省级下辖的黄骅县为例。我们采用“源头-阻力-地表-廊道-节点”的研究范式确定了生态恢复的优先区域。此外,我们使用非支配排序遗传算法II (NSGA-II)寻找帕累托最优解,以平衡不同目标之间的权衡。结果表明,黄骅市共确定了46个生态屏障为重点生态修复区,主要为耕地和建设用地。针对不同的决策需求,针对典型生态修复重点区域提出了高价值成本比、高生态价值和低实施成本的3种最优生态修复策略。区域I的价值成本比最高,而区域II和区域III的价值成本比相同,区域I最适合优先修复。当投资预算低于生态修复的实施成本时,往往选择价值成本比高的生态修复项目。本研究构建了制定最优生态恢复策略的方法论框架,有效地提高了决策过程的科学性。研究结果为制定黄骅市生态恢复策略提供了重要的科学依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Ecology and Conservation
Global Ecology and Conservation Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
346
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: Global Ecology and Conservation is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal covering all sub-disciplines of ecological and conservation science: from theory to practice, from molecules to ecosystems, from regional to global. The fields covered include: organismal, population, community, and ecosystem ecology; physiological, evolutionary, and behavioral ecology; and conservation science.
期刊最新文献
No difference in the food composition between wolf × dog hybrids and wolves in Poland Prioritizing underground roosts for bat conservation in Kenya Drought alters the structure and assembly drivers of soil actinomycete and bacterial (non-Act.) communities in agroecosystems Differences in driving pathways of soil PLFA between dry–hot valley and humid regions in Southwest China Leveraging the multidimensional nutritional niche to inform conservation practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1