Model’s parameter sensitivity assessment and their impact on Urban Densification using regression analysis

IF 8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL Geography and Sustainability Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-08 DOI:10.1016/j.geosus.2025.100276
Anasua Chakraborty , Mitali Yeshwant Joshi , Ahmed Mustafa , Mario Cools , Jacques Teller
{"title":"Model’s parameter sensitivity assessment and their impact on Urban Densification using regression analysis","authors":"Anasua Chakraborty ,&nbsp;Mitali Yeshwant Joshi ,&nbsp;Ahmed Mustafa ,&nbsp;Mario Cools ,&nbsp;Jacques Teller","doi":"10.1016/j.geosus.2025.100276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The impact of different global and local variables in urban development processes requires a systematic study to fully comprehend the underlying complexities in them. The interplay between such variables is crucial for modelling urban growth to closely reflects reality. Despite extensive research, ambiguity remains about how variations in these input variables influence urban densification. In this study, we conduct a global sensitivity analysis (SA) using a multinomial logistic regression (MNL) model to assess the model’s explanatory and predictive power. We examine the influence of global variables, including spatial resolution, neighborhood size, and density classes, under different input combinations at a provincial scale to understand their impact on densification. Additionally, we perform a stepwise regression to identify the significant explanatory variables that are important for understanding densification in the Brussels Metropolitan Area (BMA). Our results indicate that a finer spatial resolution of 50 m and 100 m, smaller neighborhood size of 5 × 5 and 3 × 3, and specific density classes—namely 3 (non-built-up, low and high built-up) and 4 (non-built-up, low, medium and high built-up)—optimally explain and predict urban densification. In line with the same, the stepwise regression reveals that models with a coarser resolution of 300 m lack significant variables, reflecting a lower explanatory power for densification. This approach aids in identifying optimal and significant global variables with higher explanatory power for understanding and predicting urban densification. Furthermore, these findings are reproducible in a global urban context, offering valuable insights for planners, modelers and geographers in managing future urban growth and minimizing modelling.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52374,"journal":{"name":"Geography and Sustainability","volume":"6 2","pages":"Article 100276"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geography and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266668392500015X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The impact of different global and local variables in urban development processes requires a systematic study to fully comprehend the underlying complexities in them. The interplay between such variables is crucial for modelling urban growth to closely reflects reality. Despite extensive research, ambiguity remains about how variations in these input variables influence urban densification. In this study, we conduct a global sensitivity analysis (SA) using a multinomial logistic regression (MNL) model to assess the model’s explanatory and predictive power. We examine the influence of global variables, including spatial resolution, neighborhood size, and density classes, under different input combinations at a provincial scale to understand their impact on densification. Additionally, we perform a stepwise regression to identify the significant explanatory variables that are important for understanding densification in the Brussels Metropolitan Area (BMA). Our results indicate that a finer spatial resolution of 50 m and 100 m, smaller neighborhood size of 5 × 5 and 3 × 3, and specific density classes—namely 3 (non-built-up, low and high built-up) and 4 (non-built-up, low, medium and high built-up)—optimally explain and predict urban densification. In line with the same, the stepwise regression reveals that models with a coarser resolution of 300 m lack significant variables, reflecting a lower explanatory power for densification. This approach aids in identifying optimal and significant global variables with higher explanatory power for understanding and predicting urban densification. Furthermore, these findings are reproducible in a global urban context, offering valuable insights for planners, modelers and geographers in managing future urban growth and minimizing modelling.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模型参数敏感性评价及其对城市密度的影响
不同的全球和地方变量对城市发展进程的影响需要进行系统的研究,以充分理解其中潜在的复杂性。这些变量之间的相互作用对于模拟城市增长以密切反映现实至关重要。尽管进行了广泛的研究,但这些输入变量的变化如何影响城市密度仍然存在歧义。在本研究中,我们使用多项逻辑回归(MNL)模型进行全局敏感性分析(SA),以评估模型的解释和预测能力。我们研究了空间分辨率、邻域大小和密度类别等全局变量在不同输入组合下的影响,以了解它们对密度化的影响。此外,我们执行逐步回归,以确定对理解布鲁塞尔大都会区(BMA)致密化很重要的显著解释变量。研究结果表明,50 m和100 m的空间分辨率、5 × 5和3 × 3的小区大小以及3个(非建成区、低建成区和高建成区)和4个(非建成区、低建成区、中建成区和高建成区)的具体密度等级能够最优地解释和预测城市密度。与此相同,逐步回归表明,300 m的粗分辨率模型缺乏显著变量,反映了密度化的解释能力较低。这种方法有助于识别具有更高解释力的最佳和重要的全局变量,以理解和预测城市密度。此外,这些发现在全球城市背景下是可重复的,为规划人员、建模人员和地理学家在管理未来城市增长和减少建模方面提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geography and Sustainability
Geography and Sustainability Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
16.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
32
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Geography and Sustainability serves as a central hub for interdisciplinary research and education aimed at promoting sustainable development from an integrated geography perspective. By bridging natural and human sciences, the journal fosters broader analysis and innovative thinking on global and regional sustainability issues. Geography and Sustainability welcomes original, high-quality research articles, review articles, short communications, technical comments, perspective articles and editorials on the following themes: Geographical Processes: Interactions with and between water, soil, atmosphere and the biosphere and their spatio-temporal variations; Human-Environmental Systems: Interactions between humans and the environment, resilience of socio-ecological systems and vulnerability; Ecosystem Services and Human Wellbeing: Ecosystem structure, processes, services and their linkages with human wellbeing; Sustainable Development: Theory, practice and critical challenges in sustainable development.
期刊最新文献
China’s poorest counties are transitioning towards low-carbon poverty alleviation Uncovering the urban-rural integration of China over the past 40 years: Measurement framework and spatial-temporal evolution Achieving just transition through convergence in the Carbon Efficiency of Social Progress Drivers of shifts in ecosystem carbon sink and water yield trends before and after the establishment of national key ecological function zones in China Land system science for global environmental change and sustainability: Advances, challenges, and future directions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1