Acoustic beta indices exhibited a weak correlation with both vocal species composition dissimilarity and environmental factors dissimilarity in a subtropical forest
Hexiang Wang , Xuelian He , Zhiliang Yao , Bin Wang , Yiting Jiang , Luxiang Lin
{"title":"Acoustic beta indices exhibited a weak correlation with both vocal species composition dissimilarity and environmental factors dissimilarity in a subtropical forest","authors":"Hexiang Wang , Xuelian He , Zhiliang Yao , Bin Wang , Yiting Jiang , Luxiang Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Monitoring biodiversity through analyzing acoustic signals of ecosystems, as well as their relationship with environmental factors has garnered significant attention in fields like landscape ecology and biodiversity conservation. However, validation studies centered around only one of the acoustic diversities, the alpha index, while largely left out the beta one. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy of acoustic beta indices as proxies of dissimilarity in vocal bird composition, and investigated the relative importance of vegetation characteristics dissimilarity, topographic dissimilarity, and geographical distance on acoustic beta diversity. To get acoustic beta indices of birds, we deployed 16 autonomous acoustic recorders across a biodiversity monitoring platform within a subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest during bird breeding season. We performed bird species aural identification and investigated the relationship between vocal bird composition dissimilarity and eight acoustic beta indices with Mantel test. In addition, we obtained environmental factors included vegetation characteristics and topography variables through unmanned aerial vehicle light detection and ranging (UAV LiDAR) and from census data of the forest dynamics plots. The relative importance of vegetation characteristics, topography, and geographical distance on acoustic beta diversity was investigated with multiple regressions on distance matrices (MRM) and generalized dissimilarity modelling (GDM). Our results showed that the eight acoustic beta indices were significantly positively related to each other. There was weak correlation between acoustic dissimilarity and vocal bird composition dissimilarity, indicating that acoustic diversity is an independent facet of biodiversity. This study provided the first evidence that the combination of vegetation characteristics dissimilarity, topographic dissimilarity, and geographic distance account for few variation in the acoustic beta indices within the subtropical forest. Notably, vegetation characteristics dissimilarity emerged as relatively more important to the acoustic dissimilarity compared to topographic dissimilarity. Further research examining the relationship between specific acoustic spectral characteristics and potential influencing factors is highly encouraged.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"172 ","pages":"Article 113266"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25001955","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Monitoring biodiversity through analyzing acoustic signals of ecosystems, as well as their relationship with environmental factors has garnered significant attention in fields like landscape ecology and biodiversity conservation. However, validation studies centered around only one of the acoustic diversities, the alpha index, while largely left out the beta one. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy of acoustic beta indices as proxies of dissimilarity in vocal bird composition, and investigated the relative importance of vegetation characteristics dissimilarity, topographic dissimilarity, and geographical distance on acoustic beta diversity. To get acoustic beta indices of birds, we deployed 16 autonomous acoustic recorders across a biodiversity monitoring platform within a subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest during bird breeding season. We performed bird species aural identification and investigated the relationship between vocal bird composition dissimilarity and eight acoustic beta indices with Mantel test. In addition, we obtained environmental factors included vegetation characteristics and topography variables through unmanned aerial vehicle light detection and ranging (UAV LiDAR) and from census data of the forest dynamics plots. The relative importance of vegetation characteristics, topography, and geographical distance on acoustic beta diversity was investigated with multiple regressions on distance matrices (MRM) and generalized dissimilarity modelling (GDM). Our results showed that the eight acoustic beta indices were significantly positively related to each other. There was weak correlation between acoustic dissimilarity and vocal bird composition dissimilarity, indicating that acoustic diversity is an independent facet of biodiversity. This study provided the first evidence that the combination of vegetation characteristics dissimilarity, topographic dissimilarity, and geographic distance account for few variation in the acoustic beta indices within the subtropical forest. Notably, vegetation characteristics dissimilarity emerged as relatively more important to the acoustic dissimilarity compared to topographic dissimilarity. Further research examining the relationship between specific acoustic spectral characteristics and potential influencing factors is highly encouraged.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.