Dianna J. Rowe , Timothy A. Khalil , Michael N. Kammer , Caroline M. Godfrey , Yong Zou , Cindy L. Vnencak-Jones , David Xiao , Stephen Deppen , Eric L. Grogan
{"title":"A deeper evaluation of cytokeratin fragment 21-1 as a lung cancer tumor marker and comparison of different assays","authors":"Dianna J. Rowe , Timothy A. Khalil , Michael N. Kammer , Caroline M. Godfrey , Yong Zou , Cindy L. Vnencak-Jones , David Xiao , Stephen Deppen , Eric L. Grogan","doi":"10.1016/j.biosx.2025.100593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Studies show CYFRA 21-1 fragments of cytokeratin 19 (CK19) to be promising biomarkers for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although previous literature identifies specific CYFRA 21-1 antibody binding epitopes, the exact molecular weight of the CK19 fragment being detected by current assays is not well-documented. Serum samples from 58 patients (lung cancer (N = 36), control (N = 22)) were used to measure CYFRA 21-1 across four different quantification assays: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), chemiluminescent assay (ChLIA), electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA), and compensated interferometric reader (CIR). In the cancer group, correlation between ECLIA and ELISA was high (R<em>(Pearson)</em> = 0.948, r<em>(Spearman)</em> = 0.868) while correlation between ECLIA vs ChLIA and ECLIA vs CIR was low (R<em>=</em> 0.005, r = −0.0593), (R = 0.0275, r = 0.167), respectively. In the control group, correlation between ECLIA and ELISA was high (R = 0.948, r = 0.868) while correlation between ECLIA vs ChLIA and ECLIA vs CIR was low (R = 0.005, r = −0.0593), (R = 0.0275, r = 0.167), respectively. Compared to ECLIA, concordance coefficients <strong>(</strong><em>p</em><sub><em>c</em></sub>) were poor (<em>p</em><sub><em>c</em></sub> < 0.90) across all assays except for cancers group in ELISA (<em>p</em><sub><em>c</em></sub> = 0.913). ECLIA was the only assay to report control ranges above 1 ng/mL CYFRA 21-1 (ECLIA, 1.14–21.59 ng/mL; ELISA, 0.79–24.26 ng/mL; ChLIA, 0.062–0.691 ng/mL; 0.08–7.68 ng/mL). Differing sizes of the protein being measured by each assay may have a role in the discrepancies observed. Given the different CYFRA 21-1 concentration estimates among assays, further characterization of the fragment and its release during epithelial malignancies, such as NSCLC, is imperative to developing effective biomarker assays.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":260,"journal":{"name":"Biosensors and Bioelectronics: X","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100593"},"PeriodicalIF":10.6100,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biosensors and Bioelectronics: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590137025000202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Studies show CYFRA 21-1 fragments of cytokeratin 19 (CK19) to be promising biomarkers for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although previous literature identifies specific CYFRA 21-1 antibody binding epitopes, the exact molecular weight of the CK19 fragment being detected by current assays is not well-documented. Serum samples from 58 patients (lung cancer (N = 36), control (N = 22)) were used to measure CYFRA 21-1 across four different quantification assays: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), chemiluminescent assay (ChLIA), electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA), and compensated interferometric reader (CIR). In the cancer group, correlation between ECLIA and ELISA was high (R(Pearson) = 0.948, r(Spearman) = 0.868) while correlation between ECLIA vs ChLIA and ECLIA vs CIR was low (R= 0.005, r = −0.0593), (R = 0.0275, r = 0.167), respectively. In the control group, correlation between ECLIA and ELISA was high (R = 0.948, r = 0.868) while correlation between ECLIA vs ChLIA and ECLIA vs CIR was low (R = 0.005, r = −0.0593), (R = 0.0275, r = 0.167), respectively. Compared to ECLIA, concordance coefficients (pc) were poor (pc < 0.90) across all assays except for cancers group in ELISA (pc = 0.913). ECLIA was the only assay to report control ranges above 1 ng/mL CYFRA 21-1 (ECLIA, 1.14–21.59 ng/mL; ELISA, 0.79–24.26 ng/mL; ChLIA, 0.062–0.691 ng/mL; 0.08–7.68 ng/mL). Differing sizes of the protein being measured by each assay may have a role in the discrepancies observed. Given the different CYFRA 21-1 concentration estimates among assays, further characterization of the fragment and its release during epithelial malignancies, such as NSCLC, is imperative to developing effective biomarker assays.
期刊介绍:
Biosensors and Bioelectronics: X, an open-access companion journal of Biosensors and Bioelectronics, boasts a 2020 Impact Factor of 10.61 (Journal Citation Reports, Clarivate Analytics 2021). Offering authors the opportunity to share their innovative work freely and globally, Biosensors and Bioelectronics: X aims to be a timely and permanent source of information. The journal publishes original research papers, review articles, communications, editorial highlights, perspectives, opinions, and commentaries at the intersection of technological advancements and high-impact applications. Manuscripts submitted to Biosensors and Bioelectronics: X are assessed based on originality and innovation in technology development or applications, aligning with the journal's goal to cater to a broad audience interested in this dynamic field.