Self-Deception in Human–Sex Robot Intimacy

IF 0.9 2区 哲学 Q4 ETHICS Journal of Applied Philosophy Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1111/japp.12761
Jin Hee Lee, Christina Chuang
{"title":"Self-Deception in Human–Sex Robot Intimacy","authors":"Jin Hee Lee,&nbsp;Christina Chuang","doi":"10.1111/japp.12761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>A common sentiment among anti-sex-robot scholars is the apprehension that sex robots will normalize and perpetuate sexual violence towards humans. In this new chapter within the feminist sex war, the authors of this article tend to agree with anti-sex-robot concerns and seek to further identify potential harms of sex robots. However, instead of characterizing the harm in terms of what the robots represent and symbolize, we are primarily interested in the internal state of the user and the type of relationship that will emerge between human users and sex robots, which we argue is an unprecedented sexual relation. Unlike other comparable sex products and services, sex robots occupy a liminal space between being perceived as both a sexual property and agent, oscillating based on the preferences and convenience of the user. We argue that this oscillation that enables human–sex robot intimacy requires self-deception, which in turn entails individual moral responsibility. Thus, we articulate a novel virtue-based approach of examining human–robot intimacy that focuses on cultivating erotic flourishing. We conclude that people have a moral responsibility to exhibit self-awareness within the dynamics of their intimate relationship with sex robots and the (contradictory) beliefs required to maintain such intimacy.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","volume":"42 1","pages":"303-319"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/japp.12761","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A common sentiment among anti-sex-robot scholars is the apprehension that sex robots will normalize and perpetuate sexual violence towards humans. In this new chapter within the feminist sex war, the authors of this article tend to agree with anti-sex-robot concerns and seek to further identify potential harms of sex robots. However, instead of characterizing the harm in terms of what the robots represent and symbolize, we are primarily interested in the internal state of the user and the type of relationship that will emerge between human users and sex robots, which we argue is an unprecedented sexual relation. Unlike other comparable sex products and services, sex robots occupy a liminal space between being perceived as both a sexual property and agent, oscillating based on the preferences and convenience of the user. We argue that this oscillation that enables human–sex robot intimacy requires self-deception, which in turn entails individual moral responsibility. Thus, we articulate a novel virtue-based approach of examining human–robot intimacy that focuses on cultivating erotic flourishing. We conclude that people have a moral responsibility to exhibit self-awareness within the dynamics of their intimate relationship with sex robots and the (contradictory) beliefs required to maintain such intimacy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人与机器人亲密关系中的自我欺骗
反对性爱机器人的学者普遍认为,性爱机器人将使针对人类的性暴力正常化并使之永久化。在女权主义性爱战争的新篇章中,本文的作者倾向于同意反性爱机器人的担忧,并寻求进一步识别性爱机器人的潜在危害。然而,我们不是用机器人代表和象征的东西来描述伤害,而是主要对用户的内部状态以及人类用户和性爱机器人之间将出现的关系类型感兴趣,我们认为这是一种前所未有的性关系。与其他类似的性产品和服务不同,性爱机器人在被视为性财产和性代理之间占据了一个有限的空间,它会根据用户的偏好和方便程度而波动。我们认为,这种使人类与机器人之间产生亲密关系的振荡需要自我欺骗,这反过来又需要个人的道德责任。因此,我们阐述了一种新的基于美德的方法来研究人类与机器人的亲密关系,重点是培养色情繁荣。我们的结论是,在与性爱机器人的亲密关系中,人们有道德责任表现出自我意识,以及维持这种亲密关系所需的(相互矛盾的)信念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Institutional Dysfunctions and Trust Repair: An Introduction The Ethics of Combatting Pernicious Ideological Beliefs Issue Information Tracking the Epistemic Harms of Marital Rape: The Case for Experiential Injustice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1