Opportunities and Challenges of Hepatic Impairment Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling in Drug Development-An IQ Perspective.

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics Pub Date : 2025-02-23 DOI:10.1002/cpt.3601
Hisham Qosa, Islam R Younis, Vaishali Sahasrabudhe, Ashish Sharma, Jin Yan, Gerald Galluppi, Maria M Posada, Jitendra Shrawan Kanodia
{"title":"Opportunities and Challenges of Hepatic Impairment Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling in Drug Development-An IQ Perspective.","authors":"Hisham Qosa, Islam R Younis, Vaishali Sahasrabudhe, Ashish Sharma, Jin Yan, Gerald Galluppi, Maria M Posada, Jitendra Shrawan Kanodia","doi":"10.1002/cpt.3601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PBPK models are gaining special interest as a drug development tool to estimate the effect of intrinsic and extrinsic factors on drug pharmacokinetics. The IQ Consortium Clinical Pharmacology Organ Impairment Working Group conducted a survey across IQ Consortium member pharmaceutical companies to understand current practices on how PBPK is used in understanding the effect of hepatic impairment (HI) on drug disposition and its impact on clinical development. Responses from 21 participants indicated that most organizations (~86%) are already using PBPK models for HI assessment. The survey results indicate that PBPK models have been influential in optimizing the design of dedicated HI study with 57% of respondents using PBPK models to inform the design elements of dedicated HI studies, and the majority of these respondents using the PBPK model to support internal decision making regarding the HI study. Additionally, the PBPK model was used by 62% of the respondents to predict drug plasma protein binding. Despite common usage of the PBPK models by drug developers, 14.3% of the respondents discussed their PBPK modeling strategy with regulatory agencies with only two cases where the regulators accepted the PBPK model. In conclusion, although the use of PBPK models to support regulatory decisions regarding drug use in HI is currently limited, its future is promising, and the success of such models needs collaboration between regulators and drug developers to shrink the knowledge gap in the use of PBPK as an impactful tool for drug development in patients with HI.</p>","PeriodicalId":153,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.3601","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PBPK models are gaining special interest as a drug development tool to estimate the effect of intrinsic and extrinsic factors on drug pharmacokinetics. The IQ Consortium Clinical Pharmacology Organ Impairment Working Group conducted a survey across IQ Consortium member pharmaceutical companies to understand current practices on how PBPK is used in understanding the effect of hepatic impairment (HI) on drug disposition and its impact on clinical development. Responses from 21 participants indicated that most organizations (~86%) are already using PBPK models for HI assessment. The survey results indicate that PBPK models have been influential in optimizing the design of dedicated HI study with 57% of respondents using PBPK models to inform the design elements of dedicated HI studies, and the majority of these respondents using the PBPK model to support internal decision making regarding the HI study. Additionally, the PBPK model was used by 62% of the respondents to predict drug plasma protein binding. Despite common usage of the PBPK models by drug developers, 14.3% of the respondents discussed their PBPK modeling strategy with regulatory agencies with only two cases where the regulators accepted the PBPK model. In conclusion, although the use of PBPK models to support regulatory decisions regarding drug use in HI is currently limited, its future is promising, and the success of such models needs collaboration between regulators and drug developers to shrink the knowledge gap in the use of PBPK as an impactful tool for drug development in patients with HI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
7.50%
发文量
290
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (CPT) is the authoritative cross-disciplinary journal in experimental and clinical medicine devoted to publishing advances in the nature, action, efficacy, and evaluation of therapeutics. CPT welcomes original Articles in the emerging areas of translational, predictive and personalized medicine; new therapeutic modalities including gene and cell therapies; pharmacogenomics, proteomics and metabolomics; bioinformation and applied systems biology complementing areas of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, human investigation and clinical trials, pharmacovigilence, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacometrics, and population pharmacology.
期刊最新文献
A Joint Pharmacometric Model of Iohexol and Creatinine Administered through a Meat Meal to Assess GFR and Renal OCT2/MATE Activity. Dose Determinations at Drug Approval Reviews: FDA-Approved Drugs in Past 5 Years. The Unrealized Potential of Advanced Modeling Methods to Inform Early Strategic Planning for Payer Reimbursement. Opportunities and Challenges of Hepatic Impairment Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling in Drug Development-An IQ Perspective. Impact of Regulatory Post-Market Safety Advisories on Prescribing Practices: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1