The anti-inflammatory effect of the amniotic PPARγ pathways is not dysregulated by the alternative plasticizer DINCH and its metabolite MINCH in human fetal membranes.

IF 5.8 3区 环境科学与生态学 0 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Science and Pollution Research Pub Date : 2025-02-24 DOI:10.1007/s11356-025-36137-5
Coline Charnay, Audrey Antoine, Corinne Belville, Denis Gallot, Régine Minet-Quinard, Vincent Sapin, Loïc Blanchon
{"title":"The anti-inflammatory effect of the amniotic PPARγ pathways is not dysregulated by the alternative plasticizer DINCH and its metabolite MINCH in human fetal membranes.","authors":"Coline Charnay, Audrey Antoine, Corinne Belville, Denis Gallot, Régine Minet-Quinard, Vincent Sapin, Loïc Blanchon","doi":"10.1007/s11356-025-36137-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Plasticizers, particularly phthalates, are widely used to enhance the properties of plastics, yet their harmful effects on human health, especially reproductive health, have raised concerns. This has led governments to promote the use of non-phthalate substitutes. Preterm premature rupture of fetal membranes (PPROM), affecting 3-4% of pregnancies and contributing to 40-50% of preterm births worldwide, has been associated with traditional phthalate exposure. However, no clear link has yet been established between alternative plasticizers and preterm births. Among these substitutes, DINCH (used as a phthalate replacement) and its metabolite, MINCH, appear to be promising options, although their health impacts remain largely unexplored. This study aims to assess the potential effects of DINCH and MINCH on the physiology of fetal membranes, focusing on the nuclear receptor PPARγ, which plays a critical role in pregnancy maintenance. An amniotic epithelial cell model was used to evaluate DINCH and MINCH influence on cytotoxicity, cell viability, and PPARγ activity, including its anti-inflammatory properties. Both exhibited no cytotoxic effects, did not alter PPARγ expression, and did not affect its anti-inflammatory properties. These findings suggest that DINCH and MINCH could serve as safe alternatives to phthalates, potentially reducing the risk of weakening and premature rupture of fetal membranes.</p>","PeriodicalId":545,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science and Pollution Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science and Pollution Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-025-36137-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Plasticizers, particularly phthalates, are widely used to enhance the properties of plastics, yet their harmful effects on human health, especially reproductive health, have raised concerns. This has led governments to promote the use of non-phthalate substitutes. Preterm premature rupture of fetal membranes (PPROM), affecting 3-4% of pregnancies and contributing to 40-50% of preterm births worldwide, has been associated with traditional phthalate exposure. However, no clear link has yet been established between alternative plasticizers and preterm births. Among these substitutes, DINCH (used as a phthalate replacement) and its metabolite, MINCH, appear to be promising options, although their health impacts remain largely unexplored. This study aims to assess the potential effects of DINCH and MINCH on the physiology of fetal membranes, focusing on the nuclear receptor PPARγ, which plays a critical role in pregnancy maintenance. An amniotic epithelial cell model was used to evaluate DINCH and MINCH influence on cytotoxicity, cell viability, and PPARγ activity, including its anti-inflammatory properties. Both exhibited no cytotoxic effects, did not alter PPARγ expression, and did not affect its anti-inflammatory properties. These findings suggest that DINCH and MINCH could serve as safe alternatives to phthalates, potentially reducing the risk of weakening and premature rupture of fetal membranes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
17.20%
发文量
6549
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science and Pollution Research (ESPR) serves the international community in all areas of Environmental Science and related subjects with emphasis on chemical compounds. This includes: - Terrestrial Biology and Ecology - Aquatic Biology and Ecology - Atmospheric Chemistry - Environmental Microbiology/Biobased Energy Sources - Phytoremediation and Ecosystem Restoration - Environmental Analyses and Monitoring - Assessment of Risks and Interactions of Pollutants in the Environment - Conservation Biology and Sustainable Agriculture - Impact of Chemicals/Pollutants on Human and Animal Health It reports from a broad interdisciplinary outlook.
期刊最新文献
A pioneering review on Ganoderma lucidum-derived leather: taking a step towards a cruelty-free leather manufacturing. Correction to: Collective scientific assessment as a relevant tool to inform public debate and policymaking: an illustration about the effects of plant protection products on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Flow characteristics of paste tailings in surface disposal: the role of pyrite content. Oil well-produced water pollutant adsorption and photodegradation using an innovative double Z-scheme ternary heterostructure of MIL-101(Cr)/Fe3O4-SiO2/nanorod-graphitic carbon nitride: adsorption isotherm and degradation kinetic study. The anti-inflammatory effect of the amniotic PPARγ pathways is not dysregulated by the alternative plasticizer DINCH and its metabolite MINCH in human fetal membranes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1