Patients with multiple mpMRI region of interests: should we omit targeted biopsies of secondary lesions?

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Abdominal Radiology Pub Date : 2025-02-24 DOI:10.1007/s00261-025-04854-7
Fei Qin, Changwei Yuan, Jianguo Ma, Haodong Li, Jilong Zhang, Yi Liu, Zheng Zhao
{"title":"Patients with multiple mpMRI region of interests: should we omit targeted biopsies of secondary lesions?","authors":"Fei Qin,&nbsp;Changwei Yuan,&nbsp;Jianguo Ma,&nbsp;Haodong Li,&nbsp;Jilong Zhang,&nbsp;Yi Liu,&nbsp;Zheng Zhao","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-04854-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To assess the value of secondary lesion-targeted biopsy (SLx) in detecting prostate cancer (PCa) among patients with multifocal disease.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 298 biopsy-naïve patients with 612 lesions (all with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System [PI-RADS] v2.1 ≥ 3) underwent cognitive fusion-targeted biopsy (TB) combined with systematic biopsy (SB). Our primary endpoints were to compare the detection rates of PCa and clinically significant PCa (csPCa) across different biopsy strategies (Index lesion-targeted biopsy [ILx] vs. ILx + SLx and ILx + SB vs. ILx + SLx + SB) and to define potential indications for SLx using PI-RADS and PSA density (PSAD). Secondary endpoint was to evaluate the predictive performance of index lesion (IL)- and SL-based multivariate logistic regression (MVA) models for csPCa.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The overall detection rates for PCa and csPCa were 71% and 60%, with ILx + SLx + SB as the gold standard. Adding SLx to ILx modestly increased detection rates for PCa (63% vs. 65%, <i>P</i> = 0.016) and csPCa (55% vs. 58%, <i>P</i> = 0.004), but offered no significant advantage over ILx + SB. Stratification by PI-RADS and PSAD revealed that focusing on 80% intermediate- to high-risk lesions detected 39% csPCa while reducing 20% low-risk SLx at the cost of missing 1.6% csPCa. IL-based models outperformed SL-based models in predicting csPCa (Hosmer-Lemeshow <i>P</i> = 0.653 vs. 0.461).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>SLx provides limited benefit in csPCa detection when ILx and SB have already been performed. Combining PI-RADS scores and PSAD helps identify patients who could benefit from SLx while avoiding unnecessary procedures in low-risk cases.</p><h3>Clinical trial registration</h3><p>No. 2016 − 1252, January 2017.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":"50 9","pages":"4259 - 4267"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00261-025-04854-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the value of secondary lesion-targeted biopsy (SLx) in detecting prostate cancer (PCa) among patients with multifocal disease.

Methods

A total of 298 biopsy-naïve patients with 612 lesions (all with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System [PI-RADS] v2.1 ≥ 3) underwent cognitive fusion-targeted biopsy (TB) combined with systematic biopsy (SB). Our primary endpoints were to compare the detection rates of PCa and clinically significant PCa (csPCa) across different biopsy strategies (Index lesion-targeted biopsy [ILx] vs. ILx + SLx and ILx + SB vs. ILx + SLx + SB) and to define potential indications for SLx using PI-RADS and PSA density (PSAD). Secondary endpoint was to evaluate the predictive performance of index lesion (IL)- and SL-based multivariate logistic regression (MVA) models for csPCa.

Results

The overall detection rates for PCa and csPCa were 71% and 60%, with ILx + SLx + SB as the gold standard. Adding SLx to ILx modestly increased detection rates for PCa (63% vs. 65%, P = 0.016) and csPCa (55% vs. 58%, P = 0.004), but offered no significant advantage over ILx + SB. Stratification by PI-RADS and PSAD revealed that focusing on 80% intermediate- to high-risk lesions detected 39% csPCa while reducing 20% low-risk SLx at the cost of missing 1.6% csPCa. IL-based models outperformed SL-based models in predicting csPCa (Hosmer-Lemeshow P = 0.653 vs. 0.461).

Conclusion

SLx provides limited benefit in csPCa detection when ILx and SB have already been performed. Combining PI-RADS scores and PSAD helps identify patients who could benefit from SLx while avoiding unnecessary procedures in low-risk cases.

Clinical trial registration

No. 2016 − 1252, January 2017.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多发mpMRI感兴趣区域的患者:我们是否应该忽略继发性病变的靶向活检?
目的:探讨继发性病灶靶向活检(SLx)在多灶性前列腺癌(PCa)诊断中的价值。方法:298例biopsy-naïve患者612个病灶(均为前列腺影像学报告和数据系统[PI-RADS] v2.1≥3)行认知融合靶向活检(TB)联合系统活检(SB)。我们的主要终点是比较不同活检策略(指数病变靶向活检[ILx] vs. ILx + SLx, ILx + SB vs. ILx + SLx + SB)中PCa和临床显著PCa (csPCa)的检出率,并使用PI-RADS和PSA密度(PSAD)确定SLx的潜在适应症。次要终点是评估指数病变(IL)和基于sl的多变量logistic回归(MVA)模型对csPCa的预测性能。结果:PCa和csPCa的总检出率分别为71%和60%,以ILx + SLx + SB为金标准。在ILx中加入SLx可适度提高PCa (63% vs. 65%, P = 0.016)和csPCa (55% vs. 58%, P = 0.004)的检出率,但与ILx + SB相比没有显著优势。PI-RADS和PSAD分层显示,对80%的中高风险病变进行集中检查,可检出39%的csPCa,而以丢失1.6%的csPCa为代价,可减少20%的低风险SLx。基于il的模型在预测csPCa方面优于基于sl的模型(Hosmer-Lemeshow P = 0.653 vs. 0.461)。结论:当已经进行了ILx和SB时,SLx对csPCa检测的益处有限。结合PI-RADS评分和PSAD有助于确定可以从SLx中获益的患者,同时避免在低风险病例中进行不必要的手术。临床试验注册号:2016 - 1252,2017年1月。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Abdominal Radiology
Abdominal Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
334
期刊介绍: Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section. Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology: · Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) · Published in Cooperation with: European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR) · Efficient handling and Expeditious review · Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style · Global readership · Readers can earn CME credits
期刊最新文献
Navigating the new frontier: growth, integrity, and our vision for 2026 Early and delayed post-cesarean complications: an imaging review Correction to: Pictorial review of multiparametric MRI in bladder urothelial carcinoma with variant histology: pearls and pitfalls. Toward eliminating missed important findings in fibrostenosing Crohn’s disease at CT and MR enterography Non-Gaussian diffusion MRI models for preoperative assessment of microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1