Wenqing Ye, Shaodan Zhang, Shuqing Zhu, Jinxin Li, Juan Gu, Mian Zhao, Kaiting Jiang, Yanqian Xie, Rongrong Le, Weihe Zhou, Clement C Tham, Mingguang He, Yuanbo Liang, Ningli Wang
{"title":"24-month prospective randomized comparison of ab externo penetrating canaloplasty versus trabeculectomy in primary angle-closure glaucoma.","authors":"Wenqing Ye, Shaodan Zhang, Shuqing Zhu, Jinxin Li, Juan Gu, Mian Zhao, Kaiting Jiang, Yanqian Xie, Rongrong Le, Weihe Zhou, Clement C Tham, Mingguang He, Yuanbo Liang, Ningli Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.apjo.2025.100167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To report the 24-month efficacy and safety of ab externo penetrating canaloplasty compared with trabeculectomy in the treatment of primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Patients with PACG and inadequately controlled intraocular pressure (IOP) were recruited. Patients enrolled were randomized to either ab externo penetrating canaloplasty (PCP group) or trabeculectomy (TRAB group). The main outcome measures were intraocular pressure (IOP), number of glaucoma medications, success rate and ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaire. Surgical success (definition 1) was defined as 6 mm Hg ≤ IOP ≤ 21 mm Hg with an IOP reduction of ≥ 20 % without glaucoma medications (complete success) or regardless of glaucoma medications (qualified success).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 52 eyes (44 patients) were finally enrolled with 25 eyes in PCP group and 27 eyes in TRAB group. PCP group (85.0 %) had a similar qualified success rate compared with TRAB group (87.0 %) with definition 1 at 24 months in intention to treat (ITT) analysis (P = 1.000). In per protocol (PP) analysis, the qualified success with definition 1 were 81.3 % in PCP group and 87.0 % in TRAB group (P = 0.972). But PCP group had a lower success rate in postoperative IOP ≤ 15 mm Hg with an IOP reduction of ≥ 20 % than in TRAB group, in ITT analysis with complete success (PCP 35.0 % vs TRAB 65.2 %, P = 0.048) and PP analysis with qualified success (PCP 31.3 % vs. TRAB 69.6 %, P = 0.025). The mean OSDI score was equal in PCP group (11.9 ± 8.5) and TRAB group (16.6 ± 14.3) (P = 0.302). Hypotony-associated complications were the main complications in PCP group and TRAB group (24.0 % vs. 33.3 %, P = 0.458).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with trabeculectomy, ab externo penetrating canaloplasty had a similar qualified success rate and comparable complications at 24 months. Without frequent bleb interventions, penetrating canaloplasty may be a promising surgery for PACG patients especially with early or mild stages.</p>","PeriodicalId":8594,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"100167"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apjo.2025.100167","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To report the 24-month efficacy and safety of ab externo penetrating canaloplasty compared with trabeculectomy in the treatment of primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG).
Methods: This is a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Patients with PACG and inadequately controlled intraocular pressure (IOP) were recruited. Patients enrolled were randomized to either ab externo penetrating canaloplasty (PCP group) or trabeculectomy (TRAB group). The main outcome measures were intraocular pressure (IOP), number of glaucoma medications, success rate and ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaire. Surgical success (definition 1) was defined as 6 mm Hg ≤ IOP ≤ 21 mm Hg with an IOP reduction of ≥ 20 % without glaucoma medications (complete success) or regardless of glaucoma medications (qualified success).
Results: A total of 52 eyes (44 patients) were finally enrolled with 25 eyes in PCP group and 27 eyes in TRAB group. PCP group (85.0 %) had a similar qualified success rate compared with TRAB group (87.0 %) with definition 1 at 24 months in intention to treat (ITT) analysis (P = 1.000). In per protocol (PP) analysis, the qualified success with definition 1 were 81.3 % in PCP group and 87.0 % in TRAB group (P = 0.972). But PCP group had a lower success rate in postoperative IOP ≤ 15 mm Hg with an IOP reduction of ≥ 20 % than in TRAB group, in ITT analysis with complete success (PCP 35.0 % vs TRAB 65.2 %, P = 0.048) and PP analysis with qualified success (PCP 31.3 % vs. TRAB 69.6 %, P = 0.025). The mean OSDI score was equal in PCP group (11.9 ± 8.5) and TRAB group (16.6 ± 14.3) (P = 0.302). Hypotony-associated complications were the main complications in PCP group and TRAB group (24.0 % vs. 33.3 %, P = 0.458).
Conclusions: Compared with trabeculectomy, ab externo penetrating canaloplasty had a similar qualified success rate and comparable complications at 24 months. Without frequent bleb interventions, penetrating canaloplasty may be a promising surgery for PACG patients especially with early or mild stages.
期刊介绍:
The Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology, a bimonthly, peer-reviewed online scientific publication, is an official publication of the Asia-Pacific Academy of Ophthalmology (APAO), a supranational organization which is committed to research, training, learning, publication and knowledge and skill transfers in ophthalmology and visual sciences. The Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology welcomes review articles on currently hot topics, original, previously unpublished manuscripts describing clinical investigations, clinical observations and clinically relevant laboratory investigations, as well as .perspectives containing personal viewpoints on topics with broad interests. Editorials are published by invitation only. Case reports are generally not considered. The Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology covers 16 subspecialties and is freely circulated among individual members of the APAO’s member societies, which amounts to a potential readership of over 50,000.