Prospective Comparison of Temporal Myocardial Function in Men Versus Women After Anterior ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Timely Reperfusion

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS American Journal of Cardiology Pub Date : 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.02.015
Sandeep Jha MD , Aaron Shekka Espinosa MD , Linnea Molander MD , Angela Poller MSc , Valentyna Sevastianova MD, PhD , Koen Simons PhD , Julia Baranowska MD , Thorsteinn Gudmundsson MD , Emanuele Bobbio MD , Rickard Zeijlon MD, PhD , Carlo Pirazzi MD, PhD , Andreas Martinsson MD, PhD , Tomas Mellberg MD, PhD , Petronella Torild RN , Joakim Sundstrom MD , Erik Axel Andersson PhD , Sigurdur Thorleifsson MD , Sabin Salahuddin MD , Ahmed Elmahdy MD , Tetiana Pylova MD, PhD , Bjorn Redfors MD, PhD
{"title":"Prospective Comparison of Temporal Myocardial Function in Men Versus Women After Anterior ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Timely Reperfusion","authors":"Sandeep Jha MD ,&nbsp;Aaron Shekka Espinosa MD ,&nbsp;Linnea Molander MD ,&nbsp;Angela Poller MSc ,&nbsp;Valentyna Sevastianova MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Koen Simons PhD ,&nbsp;Julia Baranowska MD ,&nbsp;Thorsteinn Gudmundsson MD ,&nbsp;Emanuele Bobbio MD ,&nbsp;Rickard Zeijlon MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Carlo Pirazzi MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Andreas Martinsson MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Tomas Mellberg MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Petronella Torild RN ,&nbsp;Joakim Sundstrom MD ,&nbsp;Erik Axel Andersson PhD ,&nbsp;Sigurdur Thorleifsson MD ,&nbsp;Sabin Salahuddin MD ,&nbsp;Ahmed Elmahdy MD ,&nbsp;Tetiana Pylova MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Bjorn Redfors MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.02.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Compared to men, women have been reported to have increased morbidity and mortality after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI); but sex differences in cardiac function in the acute and subacute phases of STEMI are incompletely understood. The objective of this study was to prospectively compare changes in cardiac function over the acute and subacute phases after anterior STEMI with timely reperfusion in women versus men. The Stunning in Takotsubo versus Acute Myocardial Infarction (STAMI) study (NCT04448639) prospectively enrolled 105 men and 41 women with anterior STEMI. Echocardiography and blood sampling were performed within 4 hours of admission and at 1, 2, 3, 7, 14, and 30 days after admission. The primary outcome was akinesia recovery, defined as the difference in the percentage of akinesia observed at baseline versus follow-up. Secondary outcomes included wall motion score index (WMSI), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and global longitudinal strain (GLS). Mixed effects linear regression or zero-inflated tobit models with random intercepts were used to model echocardiographic parameters over time. Baseline patient characteristics were similar in both groups. The difference between women and men in akinesia recovery at 30 days was 8.3% (95% credible interval 0.8%, 15.5%). The covariate-adjusted posterior probability that akinesia recovery and WMSI improvement at 30 days are greater in women than men were 96.0% and 99.0% respectively. Similar but less pronounced trends towards greater improvement in women than men were observed for LVEF and GLS. In conclusion, cardiac dysfunction recovered to a greater extent in women than in men after anterior STEMI with timely reperfusion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7705,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiology","volume":"244 ","pages":"Pages 48-57"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002914925000980","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Compared to men, women have been reported to have increased morbidity and mortality after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI); but sex differences in cardiac function in the acute and subacute phases of STEMI are incompletely understood. The objective of this study was to prospectively compare changes in cardiac function over the acute and subacute phases after anterior STEMI with timely reperfusion in women versus men. The Stunning in Takotsubo versus Acute Myocardial Infarction (STAMI) study (NCT04448639) prospectively enrolled 105 men and 41 women with anterior STEMI. Echocardiography and blood sampling were performed within 4 hours of admission and at 1, 2, 3, 7, 14, and 30 days after admission. The primary outcome was akinesia recovery, defined as the difference in the percentage of akinesia observed at baseline versus follow-up. Secondary outcomes included wall motion score index (WMSI), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and global longitudinal strain (GLS). Mixed effects linear regression or zero-inflated tobit models with random intercepts were used to model echocardiographic parameters over time. Baseline patient characteristics were similar in both groups. The difference between women and men in akinesia recovery at 30 days was 8.3% (95% credible interval 0.8%, 15.5%). The covariate-adjusted posterior probability that akinesia recovery and WMSI improvement at 30 days are greater in women than men were 96.0% and 99.0% respectively. Similar but less pronounced trends towards greater improvement in women than men were observed for LVEF and GLS. In conclusion, cardiac dysfunction recovered to a greater extent in women than in men after anterior STEMI with timely reperfusion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
及时再灌注st段抬高型心肌梗死后男性与女性颞叶心肌功能的前瞻性比较。
据报道,与男性相比,女性在st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)后的发病率和死亡率都有所增加;但STEMI急性期和亚急性期心功能的性别差异尚不完全清楚。本研究的目的是前瞻性地比较女性和男性STEMI前路及时再灌注后急性和亚急性期心功能的变化。Takotsubo与急性心肌梗死(STAMI)研究(NCT04448639)前瞻性纳入了105名前路STEMI男性和41名女性。入院后4小时及入院后1、2、3、7、14、30天分别行超声心动图及采血。主要结果是运动能力恢复,定义为基线与随访时观察到的运动能力百分比的差异。次要结果包括壁面运动评分指数(WMSI)、左室射血分数(LVEF)和整体纵向应变(GLS)。混合效应线性回归或零膨胀tobit模型与随机截距来模拟超声心动图参数随时间的变化。两组患者的基线特征相似。女性和男性在30天的运动障碍恢复方面的差异为8.3%[95%可信区间为0.8%,15.5%]。经协变量调整后的后验概率,女性在30天的运动障碍恢复和WMSI改善分别大于男性的96.0%和99.0%。在LVEF和GLS方面,女性的改善趋势与男性相似,但不太明显。总之,女性在STEMI前路及时再灌注后心功能障碍恢复程度大于男性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Cardiology
American Journal of Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
698
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Published 24 times a year, The American Journal of Cardiology® is an independent journal designed for cardiovascular disease specialists and internists with a subspecialty in cardiology throughout the world. AJC is an independent, scientific, peer-reviewed journal of original articles that focus on the practical, clinical approach to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. AJC has one of the fastest acceptance to publication times in Cardiology. Features report on systemic hypertension, methodology, drugs, pacing, arrhythmia, preventive cardiology, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy. Also included are editorials, readers'' comments, and symposia.
期刊最新文献
Non-Invasive Imaging Modalities for the Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease among Patients with High Body Mass Index: A Focus on Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA). Erratum to' Trends, Predictors, and Outcomes of Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Postcardiac Surgery Cardiogenic Shock' [The American Journal of Cardiology 123(2019) Pages 489-497]. Femoropopliteal Artery Atherectomy for Symptomatic Peripheral Artery Disease in the XLPAD Registry. Cardiogenic Shock: A State-of-the-Art Review. Death Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Data from the PROGRESS-COMPLICATIONS registry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1