Aarij Elahi, Momina Qamar, Fasih Mand Khan, Rameesha Babar, Muhammad Jawad Zahid, Muhammad Omar Ahmad, Shah Wali, Sharib Afzal, Moeen Ikram, Syed Ahsan Ali Shah, Mohammad Ebad Ur Rehman, Huzaifa Ahmad Cheema, Usama Anwar, Muhammad Mohid Tahir, Ioannis Bellos
{"title":"Efficacy of drug-coated balloon versus uncoated balloon for dysfunctional dialysis access: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Aarij Elahi, Momina Qamar, Fasih Mand Khan, Rameesha Babar, Muhammad Jawad Zahid, Muhammad Omar Ahmad, Shah Wali, Sharib Afzal, Moeen Ikram, Syed Ahsan Ali Shah, Mohammad Ebad Ur Rehman, Huzaifa Ahmad Cheema, Usama Anwar, Muhammad Mohid Tahir, Ioannis Bellos","doi":"10.1007/s10157-025-02642-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dysfunctional vascular access is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing hemodialysis, affecting both arteriovenous fistulas and grafts. The most optimal strategy to restore long-term patency has not been established. This meta-analysis compares drug-coated balloon (DCB) versus uncoated balloon (UCB) angioplasty for dysfunctional vascular access.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic literature search across multiple databases from inception to June 2024. Randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) comparing DCB and UCB in dialysis patients with dysfunctional vascular access were included. Risk ratios were pooled using a random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven RCTs (2645 patients) were included. Target lesion patency (TLP) at 6 months was significantly superior in the DCB group (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.07-1.39, p = 0.003). The two regimens were comparable for TLP at 3 months (RR 1.14, p = 0.24) and 12 months (RR 1.14, p = 0.10). The two regimens were comparable in terms of circuit patency rate, target-lesion revascularization, and all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DCB has significantly superior TLP and a comparable risk of mortality to UCB. Further research is warranted to identify factors affecting outcomes following DCB angioplasty for dysfunctional dialysis access.</p>","PeriodicalId":10349,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-025-02642-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Dysfunctional vascular access is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing hemodialysis, affecting both arteriovenous fistulas and grafts. The most optimal strategy to restore long-term patency has not been established. This meta-analysis compares drug-coated balloon (DCB) versus uncoated balloon (UCB) angioplasty for dysfunctional vascular access.
Methods: We performed a systematic literature search across multiple databases from inception to June 2024. Randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) comparing DCB and UCB in dialysis patients with dysfunctional vascular access were included. Risk ratios were pooled using a random-effects model.
Results: Twenty-seven RCTs (2645 patients) were included. Target lesion patency (TLP) at 6 months was significantly superior in the DCB group (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.07-1.39, p = 0.003). The two regimens were comparable for TLP at 3 months (RR 1.14, p = 0.24) and 12 months (RR 1.14, p = 0.10). The two regimens were comparable in terms of circuit patency rate, target-lesion revascularization, and all-cause mortality.
Conclusion: DCB has significantly superior TLP and a comparable risk of mortality to UCB. Further research is warranted to identify factors affecting outcomes following DCB angioplasty for dysfunctional dialysis access.
期刊介绍:
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology is a peer-reviewed monthly journal, officially published by the Japanese Society of Nephrology (JSN) to provide an international forum for the discussion of research and issues relating to the study of nephrology. Out of respect for the founders of the JSN, the title of this journal uses the term “nephrology,” a word created and brought into use with the establishment of the JSN (Japanese Journal of Nephrology, Vol. 2, No. 1, 1960). The journal publishes articles on all aspects of nephrology, including basic, experimental, and clinical research, so as to share the latest research findings and ideas not only with members of the JSN, but with all researchers who wish to contribute to a better understanding of recent advances in nephrology. The journal is unique in that it introduces to an international readership original reports from Japan and also the clinical standards discussed and agreed by JSN.