Laser interstitial thermal therapy for recurrent brain metastases following stereotactic radiosurgery: a systematic review.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics Pub Date : 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1080/14737175.2025.2471551
Timoteo Almeida, Jheremy S Reyes, Sydney E Scanlon, Stephen C Frederico, Sakibul Huq, Costas G Hadjipanayis
{"title":"Laser interstitial thermal therapy for recurrent brain metastases following stereotactic radiosurgery: a systematic review.","authors":"Timoteo Almeida, Jheremy S Reyes, Sydney E Scanlon, Stephen C Frederico, Sakibul Huq, Costas G Hadjipanayis","doi":"10.1080/14737175.2025.2471551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy (LITT) has emerged as a promising minimally invasive treatment option for recurrent brain metastases, especially for patients who have previously undergone Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS). Despite its growing use, additional research is needed to explore its utility and safety in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review evaluates the literature on LITT for recurrent brain metastases post-SRS, including patient selection, treatment protocols, outcomes, and complications. The review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024577899) and followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen studies, encompassing 694 patients, met our inclusion criteria. The median overall survival (OS) across these studies was 14.4 months with an average 12-month OS of 60.1%. Notably, median OS was 5.9 months after LITT alone and 12.7 months when LITT was followed by adjuvant SRS. The pooled local control rate was 75.6% at 6 months and 72.2% at 12 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LITT is a minimally invasive treatment option that has shown potential in managing recurrent brain metastases after prior SRS, particularly when biopsy is required to differentiate between tumor recurrence and radiation necrosis. However, data on the comparative efficacy and cost-effectiveness of LITT versus alternative treatments such as repeat SRS or craniotomy remain limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":12190,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2025.2471551","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy (LITT) has emerged as a promising minimally invasive treatment option for recurrent brain metastases, especially for patients who have previously undergone Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS). Despite its growing use, additional research is needed to explore its utility and safety in this population.

Methods: This systematic review evaluates the literature on LITT for recurrent brain metastases post-SRS, including patient selection, treatment protocols, outcomes, and complications. The review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024577899) and followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines.

Results: Seventeen studies, encompassing 694 patients, met our inclusion criteria. The median overall survival (OS) across these studies was 14.4 months with an average 12-month OS of 60.1%. Notably, median OS was 5.9 months after LITT alone and 12.7 months when LITT was followed by adjuvant SRS. The pooled local control rate was 75.6% at 6 months and 72.2% at 12 months.

Conclusion: LITT is a minimally invasive treatment option that has shown potential in managing recurrent brain metastases after prior SRS, particularly when biopsy is required to differentiate between tumor recurrence and radiation necrosis. However, data on the comparative efficacy and cost-effectiveness of LITT versus alternative treatments such as repeat SRS or craniotomy remain limited.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
简介:激光间质热疗(LITT)已成为治疗复发性脑转移瘤的一种很有前景的微创治疗方法,尤其是对于那些曾接受过立体定向放射外科手术(SRS)的患者。尽管其应用越来越广泛,但仍需要更多的研究来探讨其在这一人群中的实用性和安全性:本系统性综述评估了 LITT 治疗 SRS 后复发脑转移瘤的文献,包括患者选择、治疗方案、疗效和并发症。该综述已在 PROSPERO(CRD42024577899)注册,并遵循 PRISMA 2020 指南:共有 17 项研究符合我们的纳入标准,涉及 694 名患者。这些研究的中位总生存期(OS)为14.4个月,平均12个月OS为60.1%。值得注意的是,单纯 LITT 治疗后的中位生存期为 5.9 个月,LITT 治疗后辅助 SRS 治疗的中位生存期为 12.7 个月。6个月和12个月的局部控制率分别为75.6%和72.2%:结论:LITT是一种微创治疗方案,在治疗既往SRS后复发的脑转移瘤方面具有潜力,尤其是在需要活检以区分肿瘤复发和放射坏死的情况下。然而,LITT与其他治疗方法(如重复SRS或开颅手术)的疗效和成本效益比较数据仍然有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics
Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.30%
发文量
61
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics (ISSN 1473-7175) provides expert reviews on the use of drugs and medicines in clinical neurology and neuropsychiatry. Coverage includes disease management, new medicines and drugs in neurology, therapeutic indications, diagnostics, medical treatment guidelines and neurological diseases such as stroke, epilepsy, Alzheimer''s and Parkinson''s. Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections: Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points
期刊最新文献
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease: a review of clinical developments and its management - What's new in 2025? Treating subependymal giant cell astrocytoma in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex: an update of the literature. Therapeutic strategies that modulate the acute phase of secondary spinal cord injury scarring and inflammation and improve injury outcomes. Neuromodulation as a treatment strategy in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: evidence and future directions. Advances in the early diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1