{"title":"Advances in the early diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.","authors":"Pilar H García-Casanova, Juan F Vázquez-Costa","doi":"10.1080/14737175.2025.2471556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a rapidly progressing neurodegenerative disease. Despite rapid disease progression, diagnostic delay of 10-16 months persists, influenced by disease-specific factors and healthcare systems. Reducing it is crucial for early intervention, multidisciplinary care planning, and patient participation in clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>The authors review relevant studies identified through PubMed from 1990 to 2024. The article explores factors contributing to diagnostic delay, the importance of early diagnosis, and strategies for improvement, including the role of diagnostic criteria and biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Diagnosis of ALS remains clinical, with clinical expertise as the main modifiable factor in the diagnostic delay. Some biomarkers may be useful to speed up diagnosis at an earlier stage of the disease and in patients with atypical presentations or co-morbidities. However, the use of biomarkers for ALS diagnosis in clinical practice is far from being established and poses considerable challenges, including the lack of disease-specific biomarkers and the potential for delayed results. Until disease-specific biomarkers become available, early referral to ALS specialists, together with physician education programs, will remain the main tools to reduce diagnostic delay in the next years.</p>","PeriodicalId":12190,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2025.2471556","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a rapidly progressing neurodegenerative disease. Despite rapid disease progression, diagnostic delay of 10-16 months persists, influenced by disease-specific factors and healthcare systems. Reducing it is crucial for early intervention, multidisciplinary care planning, and patient participation in clinical trials.
Areas covered: The authors review relevant studies identified through PubMed from 1990 to 2024. The article explores factors contributing to diagnostic delay, the importance of early diagnosis, and strategies for improvement, including the role of diagnostic criteria and biomarkers.
Expert opinion: Diagnosis of ALS remains clinical, with clinical expertise as the main modifiable factor in the diagnostic delay. Some biomarkers may be useful to speed up diagnosis at an earlier stage of the disease and in patients with atypical presentations or co-morbidities. However, the use of biomarkers for ALS diagnosis in clinical practice is far from being established and poses considerable challenges, including the lack of disease-specific biomarkers and the potential for delayed results. Until disease-specific biomarkers become available, early referral to ALS specialists, together with physician education programs, will remain the main tools to reduce diagnostic delay in the next years.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics (ISSN 1473-7175) provides expert reviews on the use of drugs and medicines in clinical neurology and neuropsychiatry. Coverage includes disease management, new medicines and drugs in neurology, therapeutic indications, diagnostics, medical treatment guidelines and neurological diseases such as stroke, epilepsy, Alzheimer''s and Parkinson''s.
Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections:
Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results
Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points