Transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-24 DOI:10.1080/13651501.2025.2466498
Le Yan, Yixuan Wang, Mi Li
{"title":"Transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.","authors":"Le Yan, Yixuan Wang, Mi Li","doi":"10.1080/13651501.2025.2466498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Efficacy and safety of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) were explored by meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Four electronic databases (Cochrane, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science) were retrieved at 25/06/23. From our inclusion criteria, seven studies (<i>N</i> = 201 patients) were included, and we performed a meta-analysis using Stata15.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results suggested that the total Y-BOCS (Yale-Brown obsessive com-pulsive scale<b>)</b> scale was significantly lower in patients with OCD after tDCS treatment [SMD= -0.46, 95%CI (-0.84, -0.07), I<sup>2</sup>=39%, <i>p</i> = 0.02, Grade: high]. Subgroup analysis showed statistically significant results when treatment duration ≤ 20 days [SMD= -0.95, 95%CI (-1.80, -0.10), <i>p</i> = 0.03]. Moreover, tDCS and sham tDCS-treated OCD patients showed neither significantly different depressive symptoms nor significantly different adverse events [RR= -0.21, 95%CI (-0.58, 0.15), <i>p</i> = 0.25, Grade: moderate] and [RR = 3.98, 95%CI (0.04, 374.99), <i>p</i> = 0.55, Grade: very low], respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>tDCS maybe reduce the Y-BOCS total scores in OCD patients and depressive symptoms, but for adverse reactions. the results are inconclusive.</p>","PeriodicalId":14351,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13651501.2025.2466498","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Efficacy and safety of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) were explored by meta-analysis.

Method: Four electronic databases (Cochrane, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science) were retrieved at 25/06/23. From our inclusion criteria, seven studies (N = 201 patients) were included, and we performed a meta-analysis using Stata15.0.

Results: Results suggested that the total Y-BOCS (Yale-Brown obsessive com-pulsive scale) scale was significantly lower in patients with OCD after tDCS treatment [SMD= -0.46, 95%CI (-0.84, -0.07), I2=39%, p = 0.02, Grade: high]. Subgroup analysis showed statistically significant results when treatment duration ≤ 20 days [SMD= -0.95, 95%CI (-1.80, -0.10), p = 0.03]. Moreover, tDCS and sham tDCS-treated OCD patients showed neither significantly different depressive symptoms nor significantly different adverse events [RR= -0.21, 95%CI (-0.58, 0.15), p = 0.25, Grade: moderate] and [RR = 3.98, 95%CI (0.04, 374.99), p = 0.55, Grade: very low], respectively.

Conclusion: tDCS maybe reduce the Y-BOCS total scores in OCD patients and depressive symptoms, but for adverse reactions. the results are inconclusive.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
强迫症患者经颅直流电刺激:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
目的:通过荟萃分析探讨经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)治疗强迫症(OCD)的疗效和安全性。方法:于23年6月25日检索Cochrane、PubMed、Embase、Web of Science 4个电子数据库。从我们的纳入标准中,纳入了7项研究(N = 201例患者),我们使用Stata15.0进行了荟萃分析。结果:结果显示强迫症患者经tDCS治疗后Y-BOCS (Yale-Brown强迫症量表)总分明显降低[SMD= -0.46, 95%CI (-0.84, -0.07), I2=39%, p = 0.02,等级:高]。亚组分析显示,治疗时间≤20 d时,结果具有统计学意义[SMD= -0.95, 95%CI (-1.80, -0.10), p = 0.03]。此外,tDCS与假tDCS治疗强迫症患者的抑郁症状无显著差异,不良事件也无显著差异[RR= -0.21, 95%CI (-0.58, 0.15), p = 0.25,分级:中度]和[RR= 3.98, 95%CI (0.04, 374.99), p = 0.55,分级:极低]。结论:tDCS可降低强迫症患者的Y-BOCS总分和抑郁症状,但对不良反应无显著影响。结果尚无定论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice provides an international forum for communication among health professionals with clinical, academic and research interests in psychiatry. The journal gives particular emphasis to papers that integrate the findings of academic research into realities of clinical practice. Focus on the practical aspects of managing and treating patients. Essential reading for the busy psychiatrist, trainee and interested physician. Includes original research papers, comprehensive review articles and short communications. Key words: Psychiatry, Neuropsychopharmacology, Mental health, Neuropsychiatry, Clinical Neurophysiology, Psychophysiology, Psychotherapy, Addiction, Schizophrenia, Depression, Bipolar Disorders and Anxiety.
期刊最新文献
Which clinical factors and biochemical parameters differentiate major depressive disorder with versus without lifetime psychotic symptoms? Global burden of anxiety disorders in adolescents and young adults aged 10-24 years from 1990 to 2021. Electroconvulsive therapy in the manic phase of bipolar disorder: examining oxidative stress and effects of thiol-disulfide homeostasis. Electroconvulsive therapy and its image: between human rights, evidence, and clinical responsibility. Comparative effectiveness of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors versus serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors in the risk of diagnostic conversion from unipolar depression to bipolar disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1