Responses of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), mature BNP and proBNP to sacubitril/valsartan differs between responders and non-responders.

IF 2.8 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Open Heart Pub Date : 2025-02-23 DOI:10.1136/openhrt-2024-002990
Toshio Nishikimi, Yasuaki Nakagawa, Shoichi Miyamoto, Takahiko Kanamori, Hideaki Inazumi, Hiromu Yanagisawa, Kenji Moriuchi, Hideaki Kinoshita, Yusuke Tamamura, Hiroyuki Takahama, Naoto Minamino, Koh Ono
{"title":"Responses of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), mature BNP and proBNP to sacubitril/valsartan differs between responders and non-responders.","authors":"Toshio Nishikimi, Yasuaki Nakagawa, Shoichi Miyamoto, Takahiko Kanamori, Hideaki Inazumi, Hiromu Yanagisawa, Kenji Moriuchi, Hideaki Kinoshita, Yusuke Tamamura, Hiroyuki Takahama, Naoto Minamino, Koh Ono","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2024-002990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Earlier studies showed that measured changes in plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels are inconsistent after sacubitril/valsartan administration. The reason remains unknown but may reflect the fact that BNP immunoreactivity measured with commercial BNP assays (BNPcom) includes both mature BNP and proBNP, and neprilysin degrades only mature BNP. In addition, the responsiveness to sacubitril/valsartan varies among patients with heart failure. We investigated the mechanism underlying the inconsistency of BNP measurements after sacubitril/valsartan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We measured plasma mature BNP, proBNP and total BNP (mature BNP+proBNP) levels with our immunochemiluminescent assay as well as NT-proBNP, A-type natriuretic peptide (ANP) and BNPcom with conventional assays in 54 patients with heart failure, before (baseline) and after 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks of sacubitril/valsartan administration. Responders were defined as having NT-proBNP levels at <70% of baseline after 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among all patients, total BNP and BNPcom did not change with sacubitril/valsartan treatment, whereas NT-proBNP and proBNP decreased, mature BNP modestly increased and ANP greatly increased. Responders (n=31) exhibited smaller %changes in all natriuretic peptide levels than non-responders (n=23; all p<0.01). Receiver operating characteristic curves analysis to assess the ability of the %change in each natriuretic peptide at 4 weeks to detect responders showed that the area under the curve was about 0.80 for each peptide. There were good correlations between plasma natriuretic peptides levels at baseline and throughout the sacubitril/valsartan administration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results suggest that the magnitude and direction of change in each BNP form depends on its substrate specificity for neprilysin, that differences in plasma levels of each BNP form between responders and non-responders appear early and persist and that BNPcom levels at 4 weeks can be applicable to prediction of the responders. Notably, our findings show that the idea that BNPcom cannot be used as a marker of heart failure after sacubitril/valsartan should be reconsidered.</p>","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Heart","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2024-002990","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Earlier studies showed that measured changes in plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels are inconsistent after sacubitril/valsartan administration. The reason remains unknown but may reflect the fact that BNP immunoreactivity measured with commercial BNP assays (BNPcom) includes both mature BNP and proBNP, and neprilysin degrades only mature BNP. In addition, the responsiveness to sacubitril/valsartan varies among patients with heart failure. We investigated the mechanism underlying the inconsistency of BNP measurements after sacubitril/valsartan.

Methods: We measured plasma mature BNP, proBNP and total BNP (mature BNP+proBNP) levels with our immunochemiluminescent assay as well as NT-proBNP, A-type natriuretic peptide (ANP) and BNPcom with conventional assays in 54 patients with heart failure, before (baseline) and after 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks of sacubitril/valsartan administration. Responders were defined as having NT-proBNP levels at <70% of baseline after 12 weeks.

Results: Among all patients, total BNP and BNPcom did not change with sacubitril/valsartan treatment, whereas NT-proBNP and proBNP decreased, mature BNP modestly increased and ANP greatly increased. Responders (n=31) exhibited smaller %changes in all natriuretic peptide levels than non-responders (n=23; all p<0.01). Receiver operating characteristic curves analysis to assess the ability of the %change in each natriuretic peptide at 4 weeks to detect responders showed that the area under the curve was about 0.80 for each peptide. There were good correlations between plasma natriuretic peptides levels at baseline and throughout the sacubitril/valsartan administration.

Conclusion: These results suggest that the magnitude and direction of change in each BNP form depends on its substrate specificity for neprilysin, that differences in plasma levels of each BNP form between responders and non-responders appear early and persist and that BNPcom levels at 4 weeks can be applicable to prediction of the responders. Notably, our findings show that the idea that BNPcom cannot be used as a marker of heart failure after sacubitril/valsartan should be reconsidered.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Open Heart
Open Heart CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
145
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Heart is an online-only, open access cardiology journal that aims to be “open” in many ways: open access (free access for all readers), open peer review (unblinded peer review) and open data (data sharing is encouraged). The goal is to ensure maximum transparency and maximum impact on research progress and patient care. The journal is dedicated to publishing high quality, peer reviewed medical research in all disciplines and therapeutic areas of cardiovascular medicine. Research is published across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Opinionated discussions on controversial topics are welcomed. Open Heart aims to operate a fast submission and review process with continuous publication online, to ensure timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal adheres to a rigorous and transparent peer review process, and all articles go through a statistical assessment to ensure robustness of the analyses. Open Heart is an official journal of the British Cardiovascular Society.
期刊最新文献
Association of single and multiple cardiometabolic diseases with atrial fibrillation: a prospective cohort study. Efficacy of cardiac myosin inhibitors mavacamten and aficamten in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Responses of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), mature BNP and proBNP to sacubitril/valsartan differs between responders and non-responders. Stroke and bleeding risks in Asian and non-Asian patients with atrial fibrillation: further insights into the 'East Asian Paradox'. Clinical use and impact of mechanical circulatory support for myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock in the Netherlands: a registry-based propensity-matched analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1