Collaborative Approach to Cancer Care in Patients Who Have Co-Existing Severe Mental Illness With Psychotic Features.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Psycho‐Oncology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1002/pon.70114
Lindsay Lipinski, Desi Carozza, Alex Kemp, Sanjay Gupta
{"title":"Collaborative Approach to Cancer Care in Patients Who Have Co-Existing Severe Mental Illness With Psychotic Features.","authors":"Lindsay Lipinski, Desi Carozza, Alex Kemp, Sanjay Gupta","doi":"10.1002/pon.70114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Severe and persistent mental illness with psychotic features as a comorbidity to a cancer diagnosis presents unique challenges to delivery of cancer care. Current literature suggests that there are poorer outcomes and higher mortality in patients with severe mental illness, partly explained by barriers to access of screening services and social vulnerability factors. However, cancer care is also delivered differently in patients with SMI, and often less aggressive care is offered. These healthcare disparities could be addressed in part by preparing for the ethical issues that can arise during the course of care. Cancer care staff may have limited experience and knowledge about treatment of psychiatric symptoms and may feel troubled in scenarios when patients lack capacity and become unwilling to participate in their care. Conversely, patients may benefit from early involvement of their mental health team for psychiatric optimization and contingency preparation. Specifically, preemptive planning between the cancer care team and the mental healthcare team can alleviate distress for the patient and healthcare teams alike. This is especially important when medical decision-making capacity can fluctuate during treatment. A person-centered, team-based approach to care delivery provides bidirectional empowerment. A process is proposed to enhance medical decision-making in patients with severe mental illness and cancer. It is imperative to acknowledge the disparities that exist in this patient population and create a process that will improve care and alleviate distress for the patient and the cancer care team.</p>","PeriodicalId":20779,"journal":{"name":"Psycho‐Oncology","volume":"34 2","pages":"e70114"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho‐Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70114","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Severe and persistent mental illness with psychotic features as a comorbidity to a cancer diagnosis presents unique challenges to delivery of cancer care. Current literature suggests that there are poorer outcomes and higher mortality in patients with severe mental illness, partly explained by barriers to access of screening services and social vulnerability factors. However, cancer care is also delivered differently in patients with SMI, and often less aggressive care is offered. These healthcare disparities could be addressed in part by preparing for the ethical issues that can arise during the course of care. Cancer care staff may have limited experience and knowledge about treatment of psychiatric symptoms and may feel troubled in scenarios when patients lack capacity and become unwilling to participate in their care. Conversely, patients may benefit from early involvement of their mental health team for psychiatric optimization and contingency preparation. Specifically, preemptive planning between the cancer care team and the mental healthcare team can alleviate distress for the patient and healthcare teams alike. This is especially important when medical decision-making capacity can fluctuate during treatment. A person-centered, team-based approach to care delivery provides bidirectional empowerment. A process is proposed to enhance medical decision-making in patients with severe mental illness and cancer. It is imperative to acknowledge the disparities that exist in this patient population and create a process that will improve care and alleviate distress for the patient and the cancer care team.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为同时患有严重精神疾病和精神病的患者提供癌症护理的合作方法。
严重和持续的精神疾病与精神病特征作为癌症诊断的合并症提出了癌症护理的独特挑战。目前的文献表明,严重精神疾病患者的预后较差,死亡率较高,部分原因是难以获得筛查服务和社会脆弱性因素。然而,在重度精神障碍患者中,癌症治疗的方式也不同,通常提供的治疗不那么积极。这些医疗保健差异可以通过为护理过程中可能出现的道德问题做好准备来部分解决。癌症护理人员在治疗精神症状方面的经验和知识可能有限,当患者缺乏能力而不愿参与他们的护理时,他们可能会感到困扰。相反,患者可能受益于他们的心理健康团队早期参与精神病学优化和应急准备。具体来说,癌症护理团队和精神保健团队之间的预先计划可以减轻患者和保健团队的痛苦。当医疗决策能力在治疗期间波动时,这一点尤其重要。以人为本、以团队为基础的护理方法提供了双向授权。提出了一个过程,以提高医疗决策的严重精神疾病和癌症患者。必须承认这一患者群体中存在的差异,并创建一个过程,以改善护理,减轻患者和癌症护理团队的痛苦。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psycho‐Oncology
Psycho‐Oncology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
220
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Psycho-Oncology is concerned with the psychological, social, behavioral, and ethical aspects of cancer. This subspeciality addresses the two major psychological dimensions of cancer: the psychological responses of patients to cancer at all stages of the disease, and that of their families and caretakers; and the psychological, behavioral and social factors that may influence the disease process. Psycho-oncology is an area of multi-disciplinary interest and has boundaries with the major specialities in oncology: the clinical disciplines (surgery, medicine, pediatrics, radiotherapy), epidemiology, immunology, endocrinology, biology, pathology, bioethics, palliative care, rehabilitation medicine, clinical trials research and decision making, as well as psychiatry and psychology. This international journal is published twelve times a year and will consider contributions to research of clinical and theoretical interest. Topics covered are wide-ranging and relate to the psychosocial aspects of cancer and AIDS-related tumors, including: epidemiology, quality of life, palliative and supportive care, psychiatry, psychology, sociology, social work, nursing and educational issues. Special reviews are offered from time to time. There is a section reviewing recently published books. A society news section is available for the dissemination of information relating to meetings, conferences and other society-related topics. Summary proceedings of important national and international symposia falling within the aims of the journal are presented.
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Self-Directed Aftercare Following Breast Cancer Surgery: A Scoping Review. "I Am Not the One That Caused Your Illness": Lung Cancer Stigma in Nigeria. Masculinity and Cancer Survivorship: A Systematic Review. Ecological Momentary Assessment for Assessing Affect Patterns Associated With Depression in Cancer Survivors in Primary Care: A Pilot Study. Coping Strategies and Perception of Patients With Breast Cancer Post-Surgery in an Underserved Region of Nigeria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1