Using prior-data conflict to tune Bayesian regularized regression models.

IF 1.6 2区 数学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS Statistics and Computing Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1007/s11222-025-10582-1
Timofei Biziaev, Karen Kopciuk, Thierry Chekouo
{"title":"Using prior-data conflict to tune Bayesian regularized regression models.","authors":"Timofei Biziaev, Karen Kopciuk, Thierry Chekouo","doi":"10.1007/s11222-025-10582-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In high-dimensional regression models, variable selection becomes challenging from a computational and theoretical perspective. Bayesian regularized regression via shrinkage priors like the Laplace or spike-and-slab prior are effective methods for variable selection in <math><mrow><mi>p</mi> <mo>></mo> <mi>n</mi></mrow> </math> scenarios provided the shrinkage priors are configured adequately. We propose an empirical Bayes configuration using checks for prior-data conflict: tests that assess whether there is disagreement in parameter information provided by the prior and data. We apply our proposed method to the Bayesian LASSO and spike-and-slab shrinkage priors in the linear regression model and assess the variable selection performance of our prior configurations through a high-dimensional simulation study. Additionally, we apply our method to proteomic data collected from patients admitted to the Albany Medical Center in Albany NY in April of 2020 with COVID-like respiratory issues. Simulation results suggest our proposed configurations may outperform competing models when the true regression effects are small.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11222-025-10582-1.</p>","PeriodicalId":22058,"journal":{"name":"Statistics and Computing","volume":"35 2","pages":"53"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11842445/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistics and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-025-10582-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In high-dimensional regression models, variable selection becomes challenging from a computational and theoretical perspective. Bayesian regularized regression via shrinkage priors like the Laplace or spike-and-slab prior are effective methods for variable selection in p > n scenarios provided the shrinkage priors are configured adequately. We propose an empirical Bayes configuration using checks for prior-data conflict: tests that assess whether there is disagreement in parameter information provided by the prior and data. We apply our proposed method to the Bayesian LASSO and spike-and-slab shrinkage priors in the linear regression model and assess the variable selection performance of our prior configurations through a high-dimensional simulation study. Additionally, we apply our method to proteomic data collected from patients admitted to the Albany Medical Center in Albany NY in April of 2020 with COVID-like respiratory issues. Simulation results suggest our proposed configurations may outperform competing models when the true regression effects are small.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11222-025-10582-1.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用先验数据冲突优化贝叶斯正则化回归模型。
在高维回归模型中,从计算和理论的角度来看,变量选择变得具有挑战性。贝叶斯正则化回归通过收缩先验,如拉普拉斯或尖钉-板先验是有效的方法,为变量选择在bbbbn的情况下,只要收缩先验配置充分。我们提出了一个使用先验数据冲突检查的经验贝叶斯配置:评估先验和数据提供的参数信息是否存在分歧的测试。我们将提出的方法应用于线性回归模型中的贝叶斯拉索和尖钉-板收缩先验,并通过高维模拟研究评估我们的先验配置的变量选择性能。此外,我们将我们的方法应用于从2020年4月入住纽约州奥尔巴尼奥尔巴尼医疗中心的患者中收集的蛋白质组学数据,这些患者患有类似covid - 19的呼吸问题。仿真结果表明,当真正的回归效应很小时,我们提出的配置可能优于竞争模型。补充资料:在线版本提供补充资料,网址为10.1007/s11222-025-10582-1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Statistics and Computing
Statistics and Computing 数学-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Statistics and Computing is a bi-monthly refereed journal which publishes papers covering the range of the interface between the statistical and computing sciences. In particular, it addresses the use of statistical concepts in computing science, for example in machine learning, computer vision and data analytics, as well as the use of computers in data modelling, prediction and analysis. Specific topics which are covered include: techniques for evaluating analytically intractable problems such as bootstrap resampling, Markov chain Monte Carlo, sequential Monte Carlo, approximate Bayesian computation, search and optimization methods, stochastic simulation and Monte Carlo, graphics, computer environments, statistical approaches to software errors, information retrieval, machine learning, statistics of databases and database technology, huge data sets and big data analytics, computer algebra, graphical models, image processing, tomography, inverse problems and uncertainty quantification. In addition, the journal contains original research reports, authoritative review papers, discussed papers, and occasional special issues on particular topics or carrying proceedings of relevant conferences. Statistics and Computing also publishes book review and software review sections.
期刊最新文献
Model-based clustering of time-dependent observations with common structural changes. A Support vector machine-based mixture cure model for mixed case interval censored data. Unifying Summary Statistic Selection for Approximate Bayesian Computation. A Neural Network Integrated Accelerated Failure Time-Based Mixture Cure Model. Bootstrap estimation of the proportion of outliers in robust regression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1